Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 亚太朋友圈/缅甸新闻/东南亚新闻

Channel

亚太朋友圈/缅甸新闻/东南亚新闻

@uuuat

3 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

136,647subscribers

-8,763 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002167173846
TypeChannel
Usernames@l8478 @uuuat @wanlzg520
Description#亚太 #缅甸 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #菲律宾 了解缅甸 东南亚 快人一步 官方唯一电报频道 本频道仅此一个 其它都是模仿 官方youtube : youtube.com/@uuuat 官方TikTok : tiktok.com/@wanlzg520 频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻无刻意引导,避免我们的评论区火药味变得更重,没证据不发 号商 骗子 公群 跑路 欠钱 网赌平台。 投稿小编: @lzgwxnl629 商务对接: @AJwan520
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held187
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uuuat

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@me407/413557 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC@uuuat/75066 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC1.005.5 hours
@me407/413927 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC@uuuat/75074 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC1.002.0 hours
@me407/414027 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC@uuuat/75098 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC1.0013 hours
@uuuat/75096 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC@me407/414548 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC1.005.5 hours
@uuuat/75075 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC@me407/414618 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC1.0021 hours
@uuuat/75051 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC@me407/414819 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC1.0035 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@me4078 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0035 hoursthis entry (5–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,619 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @me407. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

98,010145,410121,710136,6477 August 202611 November 2026
187 measurements spanning 96 days, net -8,763. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90,900–152,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 187
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:56136,647-60
11 Nov 2026, 18:28136,707-477
10 Nov 2026, 16:49137,184-308
10 Nov 2026, 03:08137,492-52
9 Nov 2026, 21:01137,544-1,033
9 Nov 2026, 00:47138,577-1,535
8 Nov 2026, 18:11140,112-134
8 Nov 2026, 14:10140,246-975
7 Nov 2026, 16:15141,221no change
7 Nov 2026, 14:17141,221-256
7 Nov 2026, 08:21141,477-370
6 Nov 2026, 14:36141,847-13
6 Nov 2026, 13:31141,860-79
6 Nov 2026, 10:55141,939+10,174
5 Nov 2026, 16:07131,765-907
5 Nov 2026, 10:57132,672no change
5 Nov 2026, 10:56132,672-175
4 Nov 2026, 19:19132,847-631
4 Nov 2026, 12:46133,478-135
4 Nov 2026, 07:41133,613first reading

Engagement

2,111 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.64%
avg views ÷ 136,647 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,610
438 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.026%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
492
of 2,111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 438 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held2,111 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,580,250
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 04:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈53,900
Videos
≈17,700
Links
≈28,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 56m
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 380 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 89 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3938.2%
👍3130.4%
👏2928.4%
🤣21.96%
👀10.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 868 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uuuat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 492 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC≈3,700 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#仰光富裕社区花费1500万缅币购买被抓青年充当兵役替代人员彬漂镇18名青年遭强征 11月11日消息 据消息人士透露,仰光拉达、兰马多、班贝坦等市中心富裕社区,定期从莱达雅、南达贡等郊区购买被强行抓捕的青年作为兵役替代人员,每人价格至少1500万缅币。 据称,抓捕人员每抓获一名青年可获得850万缅币,随后通过社区管理人员转卖给富裕家庭,近期每个社区每月购买人数已从2人增加至4人。 与此同时,莱达雅、瑞博达、南达贡及东达贡等郊区,持续发生青年遭人员强行抓捕后转卖充当兵役替代人员的情况。 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

11 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈3,630 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 柬埔寨西港南海后门海之港酒店被围了,据说是有人打野,来了20多个宪兵把酒店封了。 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

11 Nov 2026, 17:54 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#缅甸网络诈骗产业转向地下运营,诈骗活动向仰光、曼德勒等地扩散 缅甸军方持续打击妙瓦底水沟谷、KK Park等网络诈骗园区后,部分诈骗团伙并未停止活动,而是转移至其他地区,并逐渐转向分散化、居家办公等隐蔽运营模式。 调查发现,部分诈骗团伙重新招募曾在诈骗园区工作的缅甸籍人员,通过Telegram等平台组织团队,在家中寻找潜在受害者,再由专门人员接手实施诈骗。 目前,诈骗团伙主要通过TikTok寻找日本籍受害者,引导对方转至LINE聊天,并利用虚假身份、AI翻译及视频通话建立信任,最终诱骗受害者投资加密货币。 与此同时,诈骗产业也在缅甸境内不断转移。除妙瓦底水沟谷、KK Park外,部分诈骗园区已向克伦邦德克塔、皎克、法久等地区扩散,仰光、曼德勒及掸邦东部也陆续出现相关活动。 报道还指出,一些诈骗团伙通过Telegram招聘频道、社交媒体广告及电脑培训班招募年轻人,以高薪工作为诱饵,吸引缅甸青年加入诈骗产业。 调查认为…

11 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC≈3,580 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆料 大家避雷!原柬埔寨菩萨七公顷园区阿耀,真名“#谢圳华”,现在缅甸大其力活跃。谁跟他在一起,谁都会倒霉,被他坑骗!!!! 此人烂到骨子里了,不光骗女孩子的钱,还把国内女主播的钱骗完不算,还把人家骗出来卖掉!还让家里老父母出去借钱给他! 早期在大其力友华园区,他负责通道,回款直接被他吃了。第一次被关了,打得半死都没改掉,死猪不怕开水烫,膘厚不怕打。老板仁义,放他出来,没想到这畜生第二次又吃了公司100多万,然后在缅甸女朋友的帮助下,卷款跑路到柬埔寨!!! 这畜生不光坑父母、兄弟、老板、女孩子,连自己家表弟都不放过!骗了自家表弟将近500万!!你做的这些事情,迟早天会收你。坐牢都是对你的奖励,你就该被人卖掉,天天打你,反正你膘厚、脸皮厚。此人毫无下限,到处坑蒙拐骗,父母、老板、亲戚都被他骗过,没有什么事是他顾及的,烂透了 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

11 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC≈3,320 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚 吉打移民局突袭建筑工地,30名外籍人员被捕,涉及孟加拉、缅甸及印尼籍 11月10日上午,马来西亚吉打州移民局展开名为 Ops Sapu 的执法行动,突袭位于双溪大年 Bandar Amanjaya 的一处建筑工地,对现场49名外籍及本地人员进行身份检查。 行动中,执法人员共扣留30名涉嫌违反移民法令的外籍人员,其中包括17名孟加拉国籍、12名缅甸籍及1名印尼籍人员。据悉,被扣留人员包括27名男性及3名女性,年龄介于20岁至50岁之间。 行动结束后,30名被捕人员被送往 Belantik 移民拘留中心,以接受进一步调查及处理。有关部门将继续调查涉案人员是否涉及违反马来西亚移民法令。 此次行动再次体现马来西亚移民执法部门持续加强对外籍劳工及非法居留人员的检查力度。 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

👏1

11 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈3,180 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

😃😃😃😃 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃 ⚡️😻 新用户注册送3️⃣8️⃣🔤🧧 每人只限领取1次!! 😍8G国际娱乐 华人最稳首选🔤台 😍顶级团队,重金打造,铸造行业标杆 😍视讯全网最高反水🇹🇬%,输赢双边计算反水 😍加拿大PC28综合U台最高赔率,输赢双边计算反水 🥰☺️🥲😊😇 🩷活动救援金、亏损金、返佣金、充值金、闯关奖、充值额外奖、周福利、月福利,频道每日🇺🇸个红包 🐙储备金上亿U 头部担保 大玩家最稳首选! 😘 真人视讯😘😘万U一口 😘 PG电子麻将糊了😘😘😘😘U一拉 🐙 大玩家聚集地 大额秒出款 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 最稳大平台,点击以下链接认证 👇 😍世博联盟-联盛担保1000万U 😍okapy钱包-ok28担保上押300万U 😍8G国际娱乐官方福利群 公开透明 😃😃😃😃😃:8G.COM 😃😃😃😃😃: @KF8G 😃😃😃😃😃: @TG8G 😃😃😃😃😃: @GF8G

11 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈2,930 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

😎😎😎😎😎 😎 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 😎↖️😎😎😎😎😎😎🛍😎😎😎 🌐 亿级域名|2G.COM 品牌定位全球 实力超乎想象 全网福利天花板 入款笔笔送3%无上限 全网召集【老玩家入驻】VIP等级1:1平移 同行文案写的天花乱坠 不如2G的U到位 全球布局 · 100%保障出款 · 秒充秒提 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 😎 PG电子 新玩家游戏中爆出160万U大奖,本金仅用8000U 😎😎😎 😎 DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款66万U,提款680万U 😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎: 2g73.cc 🛍🛍🛍😎: @GF2Gcom 🥰领🥰会员 😎😎😎😎: @KF2Gcom 😎😎😎😎: @DL2Gcom 😎😎😎😎: @sx2ggbot 😎😎😎😎🛍😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

11 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈3,270 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:前天晚上,老挝磨丁铁皮屋子临检,主要检查相关手续是否合规,昨晚仅有部分有证的店正常营业,小姐姐消失了有一半… 部分店主已经通知了,磨丁还有七天就不能开小妹店了,之前中国人不能开,现在连老挝人也不能开了。 在磨丁的小伙伴们,趁这两天小妹还没有走完,抓紧去吧,打个离别炮~ 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

👍1

11 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈3,290 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

中国总理李强即将访泰!泰方重点争取恢复中国游客信心,深化经贸合作 11月10日,#泰国 副总理兼外交部长西哈萨在总理府接受采访时表示,中国国务院总理李强将于11月13日至14日访问泰国。访问期间,双方将就多项重要议题展开讨论。 在旅游安全方面,泰方将向中方说明泰国安全状况,强调泰国整体环境安全,近期出现问题的相关人员并非普通游客,希望以此恢复并增强中方对泰国旅游环境的信心。 在打击跨境犯罪方面,双方将深化执法合作,联合打击网络犯罪及电信诈骗团伙,并全力追查涉案人员。 在经贸与新兴产业合作方面,双方将致力于扩大双边贸易规模,改善泰国对华贸易逆差;同时探讨电动汽车及新兴产业领域的合作机会,推动相关投资与发展。 此外,双方还计划讨论2027年由两国外长和国防部长共同参与的“2+2”部长级对话机制框架。 此次访问被视为进一步深化泰中全面战略合作伙伴关系的重要契机,双方将在旅游安全、跨境犯罪治理及经贸投资等领域展开深度合作。 …

👏1

11 Nov 2026, 11:40 UTC≈3,940 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

缅甸再移交10名涉网赌诈骗外籍人员 累计经泰国遣返逾1.4万人 缅甸通过缅泰第二友谊大桥,依法向相关国家移交10名外籍人员,含9名越南籍和1名俄罗斯籍。这些人经泰国等邻国中转,非法入境缅甸后,在克伦邦妙瓦底- 水沟谷地区从事非法网络赌博、网络诈骗等犯罪活动。移交仪式上,缅方与越南、俄罗斯驻泰使馆及泰国达府移民局代表出席,并正式移交遣返接收文件 据悉,2025年1月30日至2026年11月10日,妙瓦底镇区共抓获非法入境外籍人员15,293人,其中14,222人已经泰国依法遣返至相关国家 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

11 Nov 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

FATF更新反洗钱名单:柬埔寨继续豁免,越老仍处灰名单 金融行动特别工作组(FATF)于10月30日更新全球反洗钱监管名单,自2023年2月正式移出“灰名单”后,柬埔寨此次继续未被列入该加强监控名单。 在周边国家方面,老挝和越南仍处于“灰名单”中,需进一步完善反洗钱及打击恐怖主义融资体系。FATF特别敦促越南加快改革步伐,若在下次全体会议前未取得实质性改善,可能考虑采取进一步措施。 与此同时,缅甸继续与朝鲜、伊朗一同被列入最高风险类别,即“呼吁采取行动的高风险司法管辖区”。 关注亚太朋友圈频道➡️ @uuuat 投稿:@lzgwxnl629

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,111 posts we hold for @uuuat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

亚太新闻 | 缅甸新闻 | 东南亚新闻 | 爆料 | 吃瓜
@ygxw3 · 148,298
#1
缅甸风景 | မြန်မာရှုခင်း
@miandian136 · 27,170
#2
缅甸亚太-东南亚新闻网
@Myanmar178 · 21,573
#3
每日缅甸曝光新闻
@Huitainangzhubian168 · 2,597
#4
缅甸新闻 ‖ 亚太新闻 ‖ 东南亚新闻
@cn789 · 19,913
#5
缅甸今日头条 | 缅甸新闻 - 爆料 - 生活频道
@Ru_Yi88 · 196,052
#6
缅甸新闻 | 华人心声
@Ytzs_News · 3,556
#7
缅甸中文网频道消息⚡
@Gung8888 · 341 (as read 13 August 2026)
#8
缅甸《 亚太吃瓜铺 🍉 》亚太新闻 | 曝光
@wbzd999 · 66,970
#9
မြန်မာ 缅甸风景|历史影像|新闻~曝光🇲🇲
@miandianfengjing0 · 18,770
#10
简易文案馆♥️ ͒
@jywag999 · 50,935
#11
亚太( 东南亚 )交友频道 文案馆
@cpdd0000 · 16,173
#12
东南亚|亚太|每日吃瓜新闻 🍉
@yataipd · 5,322
#13
东南亚曝光联播-缅甸
@dnygplm1 · 35,460
#14
东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,405
#15
缅甸人民日报🇲🇲
@mdrmrb1 · 41,483
#16
全缅甸🇲🇲吃瓜最新新闻🗞
@hgdjjhdjk · 7,164
#17
治愈清晰ins风头像/壁纸🐳
@yaoyiyaoroududu · 4,610
#18
东南亚大事件头条
@ggwan77 · 7,617
#19

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

东南亚大事件
@c4747 · 36,029
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 19 August 2026
亚太新闻 | 缅甸新闻 | 爆料
@kaihne2 · 64,889
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 19 August 2026
东南亚新闻 | 亚太日报 | 华人便民
@ytxw88 · 21,425
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 20 August 2026
缅甸今日头条 | 缅甸新闻 - 爆料 - 生活频道
@Ru_Yi88 · 196,052
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 12 August 2026
马来西亚新闻|老挝越南|金三角曝光
@miandianxinwen0 · 115,097
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 17 August 2026
缅甸《 亚太吃瓜铺 🍉 》亚太新闻 | 曝光
@wbzd999 · 66,970
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 20 August 2026
菲律宾新闻头条
@hyxw2 · 53,575
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
亚太新闻 | 缅甸新闻 | 东南亚新闻 | 爆料 | 吃瓜
@ygxw3 · 148,298
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 13 August 2026
缅甸新闻大事件
@MB104 · 50,565
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
soso东南亚-百科🌍
@ab100 · 125,246
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“亚太朋友圈/缅甸新闻/东南亚新闻” (@uuuat), 136,647 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uuuat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.