警员线上培训期间被拍到异常行为,第9警区启动内部调查 泰国第9警区近日一场线上培训引发内部调查。当天共有259名警员通过视频会议参加课程,其间一名隶属于博他仑府的警员被其他参会人员发现,在摄像头前出现疑似吸食毒品的异常动作,相关画面随后被保存并上报。 事件曝光后,博他仑府警方负责人要求立即核实涉事警员身份、培训期间的具体情况,并正式启动纪律调查程序。 警方表示,目前流出的视频只能反映当事人的相关动作,尚无法仅凭画面确认其实际吸食的具体物质,也不能直接认定其存在吸毒行为。 后续警方将结合调查结果、相关检测及当事人陈述,决定是否采取纪律处分或进一步启动刑事程序。 目前能够确认的是,相关视频确实存在,涉事警员也已被正式调查。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321

Channel
东南亚大事件-时事热点
@uu321
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47,951subscribers
-9,541 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002498238216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uu321 |
| Description | 抖音吃瓜 @ww321 金三角大事件 @U321 东南亚新闻大事件 @UU321 投稿—商务 @YY321 #东南亚 #老挝 #缅甸 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #菲律宾 #越南 #金三角 #缅北 #妙瓦底 #大其力 #西港 #木牌 #波贝 #曝光 #网友投稿 #避雷 #防骗提醒 #事件曝光 #真实经历 #当事人发声 #行业内幕 #失联曝光 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uu321 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 47,951 | -610 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 48,561 | -8,893 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 57,454 | -38 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 57,492 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 57,492 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.7%
- avg views ÷ 47,951 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,450
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.013%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (12 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 283,480 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,840
- Videos
- ≈160
- Links
- ≈174
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 25s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
潜逃17年男子在曼谷落网,旧案涉宋干节枪击执勤警察 泰国犯罪抑制部门近日在曼谷 Pom Prap Sattru Phai区 一处出租房附近,抓获一名39岁男子。该男子因一起发生于2009年的旧案被 Phu Khiao省法院 签发逮捕令,此后长期未归案。 警方资料显示,案发当年正值宋干节活动期间,执勤警员前往现场处理冲突时,遭到人员开枪攻击。调查部门随后将该男子列为案件嫌疑人,并以涉嫌共同企图杀害正在执行公务的警察、在公共场所携带武器等罪名持续追查。 警方称,嫌疑人被捕后已就当年事件作出初步陈述,但其具体法律责任仍需结合案件证据及后续司法程序认定。 目前,该男子已被移交给负责原案件的调查人员继续处理,相关旧案也将重新进入司法程序。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
#网友投稿 金边BKK1 一中国男子骑摩托无任何碰撞 突然倒地不起,目前还是昏迷状态。(手上好像拿的电子烟) PS:吸du吸死了? 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
曼谷警方侦破冒充警察电诈案,4名多国籍嫌疑人落网 曼谷警方联合多个调查单位侦办一起冒充警察实施电信诈骗的案件,目前已有4名遭法院签发逮捕令的嫌疑人被控制,涉案人员分别来自泰国、中国、越南和缅甸。 案件受害者是一名大学生。诈骗团伙先假扮拉廊府警察联系受害者,谎称其牵涉洗钱及网络赌博案件,并以配合调查为由不断施压。受害者在对方诱导下按照指示多次转移资金,最终累计损失超过1200万泰铢。 警方在后续行动中查获超过100万泰铢现金,同时扣押电脑、手机、银行卡以及大量银行账户相关资料。初步调查认为,相关账户可能涉及诈骗资金接收及流转。 目前,4名嫌疑人被指控涉嫌共同冒充他人诈骗公众。警方仍在继续追查涉案资金去向,并调查案件背后是否还有其他协助人员或关联账户。相关指控最终仍需由法院审理认定。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
❤1
#网友投稿 骗子❗️骗子❗️骗子❗️注意此人,2026年8月12日开始跟我抱怨现在大环境,然后跟我打感情牌,让我找熟人帮忙安排工作, 你说你不想打野了,想去园区求份稳定工作,老子看你是老乡才愿意帮助你,让你联系我认识多年的老友,我还给老友提前打过招呼了, 没想到你是专门挑熟人下手,骗了我老友200u,说没钱抽烟吃饭,还欠着房费,妈的看你们三个人挤在一间破公寓的房间里,一张床睡觉都要轮流睡,你说你公司解散了,老板给了每人3000人的遣散费,现在也用完了,兄弟也折进去了,现在看来这些事情恐怕都是你这种背信弃义的小人带来问题, 你这种苟且偷生的人来东南亚也就只能骗到这200u了,毫无职业操守也毫无大志,想你这种活在阴暗里的老鼠一眼就能看到尽头。 此人于2026年8月13日骗了200u后说他所在的宾馆白天有检查,需要换地方住了,然后就了无音讯了。这200u都是我朋友今天转的,看起来他们已经用了80u,剩下的钱我看你还能顶几天 …
UnionPay联名借记卡上线,新增瑞尔计价产品 柬埔寨金融支付市场近日推出新的 UnionPay联名借记卡,其中包括当地首批以柬埔寨瑞尔作为主要计价货币的相关卡种。 新产品接入UnionPay国际支付网络后,持卡人可在符合条件的境内外商户及支付场景中使用。此举也进一步丰富了柬埔寨现有电子支付工具,为本地居民提供更多银行卡及跨境支付选择。 近年来,柬埔寨持续扩展数字支付体系,Bakong等电子支付基础设施快速普及。此次增加瑞尔计价借记卡,也被视为推动本币在日常电子交易中使用的一项新尝试。 相关金融机构希望通过扩大瑞尔支付渠道,逐步降低部分消费场景对美元现金的依赖,同时提升境内外电子支付和跨境结算的便利度。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
副首相主持禁毒专项会议,研究加强跨境毒品拦截 柬埔寨国家禁毒机构近日在金边内政部召开专项协调会议,由副首相、国家禁毒局主席 Neth Savoeun 与副首相兼内政部长 Sar Sokha 共同主持,多部门官员参与讨论。 此次会议重点聚焦非法毒品跨境进入柬埔寨以及国内流通问题。与会部门研究进一步加强执法机构之间的信息共享,并提升对重点运输路线、边境区域及其他高风险地点的监控和拦截能力。 会议同时讨论了新的预防和治理措施,希望从运输、分销及执法协作等多个环节降低毒品流入风险。 目前,官方尚未公布此次会议是否同步开展新的抓捕行动,也未披露新增毒品查获数量。 现阶段可以确认的是,柬埔寨政府已针对毒品跨境流入问题启动新一轮部门协调与治理部署。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
#越南快讯:胡志明市多地开展护照、签证检查 综合网友最新反馈,胡志明市部分区域近期出现警方查验证件的情况。 目前反馈较集中的地点包括: 9郡“BS7”一带,现场警力较多; 9郡“美食街”附近,有人员被查验护照及签证; 2郡“Vista Verde公寓”附近,也有相关检查反馈。 近期在胡志明市活动的朋友,建议随身携带有效护照、签证及相关居留证件,遇到检查时正常配合即可。 #越南 #胡志明市 #护照检查 #签证检查 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
洪玛奈要求彻查太阳能路灯采购争议,重点核对价格与合同成本 柬埔寨首相洪玛奈近日要求有关政府部门,就近期引发社会关注的一项太阳能路灯工程展开核查,并对外说明项目采购及预算情况。 此次争议主要集中在路灯采购价格。网络上有消息称,部分太阳能路灯单价可能达到约2000美元,随后引发民众对设备成本、安装费用以及政府采购合理性的讨论。 洪玛奈要求主管机构进一步核对采购合同、设备型号和规格、安装成本、实际成交价格及项目预算构成,并在调查后向社会作出说明。 目前,官方所采取的措施仍属于核查和审查阶段,尚无证据能够仅凭网络流传的价格认定项目存在贪腐、虚报成本或其他违法问题。 相关采购是否存在异常,仍需等待主管部门完成调查后公布最终结果。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
洪玛奈要求上丁省严防跨境犯罪,禁止“黑色经济”落地扩张 柬埔寨首相洪玛奈近日在上丁省出席活动时,要求当地政府、警方及相关执法部门进一步加强边境地区治安管理,重点防范毒品、人口贩运以及其他跨国违法犯罪活动向当地渗透。 洪玛奈指出,上丁省位于柬埔寨东北部,与老挝接壤,边境区位在促进贸易、旅游和人员往来的同时,也增加了跨境犯罪治理难度。 他强调,地方政府必须提前防范各类与“黑色经济”有关的产业进入并形成规模,避免违法活动破坏当地正常发展环境。 一旦一个地区长期与犯罪、诈骗或其他非法产业联系在一起,不仅会影响社会治安,也可能对投资信心、旅游发展以及城市整体形象造成长期损害。 此次表态主要是对上丁省边境治理和执法工作的进一步要求,并非针对当地某一家企业或个人作出的具体犯罪认定。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
泰国国家广播和电信委员会向手机用户发出提醒,要求民众尽快检查本人手机号码及实名登记资料,并按照所属运营商提供的渠道完成必要更新。 监管部门要求相关用户在月底前完成核对,以降低手机号身份资料异常被犯罪团伙利用的风险。 官方公布的数据称,今年前四个月泰国已收到超过12万起网络犯罪案件报告,损失超过74.8亿泰铢。 其中网络购物诈骗案件数量最多,而投资类骗局造成的资金损失最为严重,接近60亿泰铢。 监管部门提醒用户如收到运营商要求更新资料的通知,应通过官方渠道操作,避免点击来源不明的短信或链接。 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
#网友投稿 NO钱包黑款15万人民币,平台下分到NO钱包在他们自己的钱包里兑换成USDT 兑换成USDT提现的时候被拒绝并且冻结资金,联系客服要求提供手持身份证和手写暗号录屏以及平台上下分记录,还有提款地址, 要求录制一个视频录屏,而我本人因为人在国外身份证在国内不能提供手持身份证原件而不能证明是我本人,就是不给我出款 其他条件都可以满足,直接就是明吃,大额还是注意点吧,要NO钱包官方人员看到想解决找小编要我联系方式 🔥 东南亚大事件 ➜ @uu321 🔥 吃瓜搞笑视频 ➜ @ww321 ☎️ 免费投稿爆料 ➜ @yy321
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @uu321. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 316,899 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件-时事热点” (@uu321), 47,951 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uu321.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.