Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 29% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net +571. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,677–12,440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 03:48
12,352
+182
10 Nov 2026, 20:54
12,170
+3
9 Nov 2026, 08:50
12,167
+5
8 Nov 2026, 02:11
12,162
-2
6 Nov 2026, 23:05
12,164
-2
5 Nov 2026, 19:27
12,166
+9
4 Nov 2026, 21:06
12,157
-1
3 Nov 2026, 22:36
12,158
+3
2 Nov 2026, 19:47
12,155
+5
31 Oct 2026, 19:01
12,150
-2
30 Oct 2026, 17:26
12,152
+8
29 Oct 2026, 19:48
12,144
+9
28 Oct 2026, 17:30
12,135
+1
27 Oct 2026, 20:59
12,134
-1
26 Oct 2026, 22:55
12,135
+1
25 Oct 2026, 23:39
12,134
+4
23 Oct 2026, 22:46
12,130
-1
22 Oct 2026, 21:31
12,131
+3
21 Oct 2026, 21:51
12,128
+3
20 Oct 2026, 19:17
12,125
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.9%
avg views ÷ 12,352 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.314%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
80 (6 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
179,050
Reactions total
562
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 21:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,130
Videos
≈389
Links
≈2,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 36s
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,014 reactions across 80 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
646
63.7%
👍
126
12.4%
🔥
85
8.38%
🤬
68
6.71%
👏
60
5.92%
👌
22
2.17%
🥰
6
0.592%
😍
1
0.099%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,014 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (26.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
MESA SECTORIAL 12 de novembre de 2026
Ordre del dia:
🟢 Convocatòria d’oposicions docents, amb l’oferta de places, els requisits i les condicions del procés selectiu.
🟢 Torn obert de paraules.
🔗 +INFO: https://www.sindicat.net/2026/11/13/resum-mesa-sectorial-del-12-de-novembre-de-2026/
🔥 EL 21N, ANEM JUNTES A BARCELONA!
⚠️ Reserva plaça al bus.
Organitzem autobusos per anar a la manifestació per l’educació pública.
🔗Consulta la informació i inscriu-t’hi segons el territori: https://www.sindicat.net/2026/11/12/el-21n-anem-juntes-a-barcelona-reserva-placa-al-bus/
🔥 21N TOTHOM AL CARRER!!🔥
#DignitatEducativa
✊ LA MOBILITZACIÓ EDUCATIVA CONTINUA!
Mantenim activa la mobilització per aconseguir millores laborals i defensar una educació pública de qualitat.
📍21 de novembre | MANIFESTACIÓ A BARCELONA (Pl. Urquinaona, 12h): Sortim al carrer per fer visible la força de tota la comunitat educativa i situar les nostres reivindicacions al centre del debat públic. Cridem docents, personal laboral, famílies i alumnat a mobilitzar-s…
📌 TORN OBERT | Respostes del Departament (3/3)
• Habilitació d’especialitats: proposen abordar-la a la mesa tècnica d’FP.
• Dades de professorat d’FP: buscaran la informació sol·licitada.
• Accés a A1 en ensenyaments artístics i places ocupades per interins durant més de tres anys: prenen nota de les demandes, sense concretar mesures ni calendari.
• Meses tècniques: plantegen una mesa específica d’arts escèniques i …
📌 TORN OBERT | Respostes del Departament (2/3)
💶 Pagaments i complements
• Complement d’aules hospitalàries: preveuen pagar-lo al novembre, amb els endarreriments des de l’1 de setembre de 2025. No concreten una previsió equivalent per a la resta de serveis plantejats.
• Complement 013 de Sant Joan de Déu, curs 2024-2025: l’han de revisar.
• Errors del complement SEC: reconeixen l’error en els casos de persones jubi…
📌 TORN OBERT | Respostes del Departament (1/3)
🏫 Recursos i plantilles
• Suports NESE A: demanen que els fem arribar la relació de queixes dels centres. Consultaran també els criteris de dotació dels equips psicosocials als centres d’alta complexitat.
• SIEI i sisena hora: defensen que el conjunt del centre s’ha d’organitzar per atendre l’alumnat. Observaran com funciona a la pràctica per valorar si cal modificar el…
🔴 USTEC·STEs (IAC) | Torn obert
Aquestes són algunes qüestions que hem traslladat al Departament:
🏫 RECURSOS, INCLUSIVA I PLANTILLES
• Retallades de suports a l’alumnat NESE A. Denunciem que es redueix personal mentre creixen les necessitats. Exigim aclarir els criteris, descongelar la borsa d’auxiliars d’educació especial i garantir els suports necessaris, també a les escoles d’educació especial.
• Pèrdua de docent…
📌 FUNCIONAMENT DELS CENTRES I ALTRES QÜESTIONS
• Institut de la Jonquera. Traslladem la denúncia sobre un cap d’estudis interí durant tres anys, el perfil de doble especialitat de la plaça, les funcions efectivament exercides i la manca d’actuació d’Inspecció.
• Camps d’aprenentatge. Traslladem les queixes sobre una tendència a la privatització al CdA de Tarragona i reclamem desbloquejar el conveni pendent del CdA de…
🔴 USTEC·STEs (IAC) no compartim aquesta proposta de convocatòria. Exigim continuar negociant l’oferta de places i les garanties del procés abans de publicar-la. La mesa ha de servir per incorporar canvis, no només per informar de decisions preses.
🔴 USTEC·STEs (IAC) | Exigim dades i compromisos concrets
▪️ La justificació de les places ha de ser prèvia a la convocatòria. Reclamem els càlculs que expliquen per què no hi ha cap plaça de primària ni d’infantil, per què falten especialitats a secundària, i el balanç de les ofertes anteriors i les places desertes. El Departament no concreta quan facilitarà aquesta anàlisi.
▪️ Indemnitzacions del personal no estabi…
📌 Noves respostes del Departament
▪️ Formació: modifica l’acumulació de cursos per arribar als trams de 30 o 100 hores. Argumenta que acumular cursos curts no ha de puntuar igual que fer cursos de més durada i que aquest criteri ja s’aplicava al procediment d’accés.
▪️ Oferta de places: reitera que parteix de la convocatòria de 2025, les plantilles i les places estructurals disponibles.
▪️ C2: consultarà amb Polític…
🤬10❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @ustec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @ustec as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ustec named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@la_iac named in 1 post, 10 November 2026 – 10 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
gencat @gencat · 36,162 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“USTEC•STEs (IAC)” (@ustec), 12,352 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ustec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.