Channel
@ustaxcis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
286subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002317907363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ustaxcis |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ustaxcis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 286 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 288 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 561 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
78 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 53.8% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚙️ Автоматическая отмена штрафов IRS: практические нюансы / ⚙️ Automatic IRS Penalty Relief: Practical Considerations For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 ⚠️ Что важно учитывать? AEP не освобождает от уплаты самого налога и начисленных процентов. Кроме того, программа распространяется далеко не на все виды штрафов. Например, она не применяется к: • штрафам за неуплату налога в течение года …
👍2❤1👏1
🆕 Новое правило IRS: автоматическая отмена некоторых штрафов / 🆕 New IRS Rule: Automatic Relief from Certain Penalties For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 IRS внедряет новый механизм Automatic Penalty Relief (AEP), который постепенно заменит знакомую многим программу First Time Abate (FTA). Ранее налогоплательщикам с хорошей историей налогового комплаенса нередко удавалось отменить отдельные…
👍3🔥1
📢 У нас появился официальный сайт! / 📢 Our Website Is Now Live! For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Мы рады сообщить, что у US Tax CIS появился официальный сайт. Теперь вся актуальная информация о нашей компании и услугах собрана в одном месте – удобно, понятно и всегда под рукой. Что вы найдете на сайте? ✅ Полный перечень наших услуг по вопросам налогообложения США и международного компл…
🔥3🎉1
💰 TrumpIRA: что известно о новой федеральной платформе / 💰 TrumpIRA: What Is Known About the New Federal Platform For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 В США появится новая государственная платформа TrumpIRA.gov, полноценный запуск которой запланирован на 1 января 2027 года. Ее задача — помочь американцам без пенсионного плана от работодателя подобрать качественный и недорогой IRA. Несмотря н…
👏3
📈 Form 8621: иностранные фонды и ETF / 📈 Form 8621: Foreign Funds and ETFs For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Если вы владеете долей в зарубежных инвестиционных структурах, такое владение может требовать сообщения в IRS по специальной форме 8621. Такая отчетность возникает в отношении инвестиций, которые по правилам США признаются PFIC (Passive Foreign Investment Company). На практике чаще…
👍3✍1
💼 Form 5471: иностранные компании / 💼 Form 5471: Foreign Corporations For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Form 5471 — это одна из основных форм международной отчетности IRS, которая используется для раскрытия информации о владении долями в иностранных компаниях. На практике обязанность по подаче формы чаще всего возникает у владельцев существенных долей в зарубежном бизнесе (от 10%). Подача…
👍3🔥1🤩1
🏦 FBAR и Form 8938: основные правила / 🏦 FBAR and Form 8938: Key Rules For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Ранее мы подробно рассказывали о требованиях к FBAR и Form 8938. Сегодня кратко напомним основные правила, которые важно учитывать владельцам зарубежных активов. 📌 FBAR FBAR - это отдельная форма, которая подается в FinCEN, а не в IRS. Обязанность по подаче возникает, если совокупный…
👍3⚡1
🌍 Зарубежные активы: о чем важно помнить? / 🌍 Foreign Assets: What Should You Pay Attention To? For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 После получения грин-карты или переезда в США многие продолжают владеть привычными зарубежными активами: 🏦 банковскими и брокерскими счетами; 💼 долями в компаниях; 📈 фондами и ETF. Однако важно помнить, что такие активы могут требовать отдельного раскрытия пер…
👍3🔥1
🗺 Dual-Status: налоговое планирование / 🗺 Dual-Status Tax Planning For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Несмотря на сложности в подготовке и ограничения, dual-status не всегда приводит к менее выгодному налоговому результату. Его основная роль - оставить иностранные доходы, полученные до начала налогового резидентства, вне налогообложения США. Поэтому при планируемом переезде важно заранее …
❤1👍1💯1
🚫 Dual-Status: ограничения / 🚫 Dual-Status: Limitations For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Dual-status отчетность не только должна "разбивать" год на 2 части, но и имеет особенности, отличные от обычной декларации налогового резидента. Поэтому важно заранее понимать не только какие формы подаются, но и какие ограничения могут применяться. 🚫 Основные ограничения при dual-status: • станд…
👍3✍1
💥 Trump Accounts: запуск уже 4 июля / 💥 Trump Accounts launch on July 4 For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 Напоминаем: с 4 июля 2026 года Trump Accounts уже доступны для пополнения. К запуску программы также появились новые возможности для оформления счетов и управления ими: 💻 Форму на открытие счета теперь можно подать и через индивидуальный онлайн IRS-аккаунт с авторизацией через ID.me;…
👍3🎉1
😨 Dual-Status: отчетность / 😨 Dual-Status Filing Requirements For access to the English version of the post, click here 👈 В прошлом посте мы разобрали, что при dual-status налоговый год “делится” на две части — до и после начала налогового резидентства США. В отчетности за такой год это обычно отражается через две формы: 🤩 Form 1040 — для периода налогового резидентства; 🥷 Form 1040-NR — для периода налогового не…
❤4🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ustaxcis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,163,119 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“US TAX CIS” (@ustaxcis), 286 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ustaxcis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.