Channel
@uspehneiz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
738subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001322831366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uspehneiz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uspehneiz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 738 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 739 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 738 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 739 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 742 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 741 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 741 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
216 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 74 | 34.3% | |
| 🤣 | 58 | 26.9% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 19.0% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 7.87% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 5.09% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 4.63% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.926% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.926% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.463% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2023 to 7 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Просто обидно разочаровываться. Каждый сам выбирает, во что и кому верить. Сначала канал ( я имею ввиду «счастливы вместе» или что-то вроде того, название не помню) позиционировал себя, как реальная помощь в любви к себе и окружающим, но потом все опустилось до такой грязи, что в голове не укладывается. Особенно когда в прямом эфире он говорил одной девушке, что она желает смерти своей матери, а другой тоже самое про…
👍43❤6🤮5🐳2💯1😢1
Реально так! Я в секретном не была, читала информацию на его бесплатных каналах, первая мысль - ересь какая-то! А руки сами тянутся к телефону в группу, потом настолько затянуло и уже чувствовала себя какой-то обделенной, что все в секретном, а я нет, как будто там творится какое-то таинство для избранных, а меня не пускают! Хотелось, но брать деньги с кредитки для оплаты секретного - ещё большая ересь! Хотела, переж…
❤16👍11🤣3
Вы крутые, такую подборку сделали! Была я там года полтора назад, подруга зазвала, она вообще любитель всякого такого, а я иногда за компанию. И хз что на меня нашло, но прям затянуло так что я секретный купила. Все вот это что мы такие классные тут, вообще все в мире ради нас совершается, ну заманчиво же. И понимала то что чудес не бывает, но верить то хочется🙈😂😂 Первое что меня прям сильно смутило это педалируемая …
🤣31👍10❤4
Отвечаю на вопрос почему чат не активен: У всех своя жизнь, в том числе и у админов, для тех кому нужно много информации уже есть здесь накопленой, а так мы все двигаемся дальше😊
❤8👍2
опечатка, речь про Юлю Швед мир её праху ещё раз напоминаю, что люди смертны, но важно помнить, что впереди новые инкарнации
❤5👍1🖕1😢1
Video, posted without a caption
🤡9🤣4🤮2
Video, posted without a caption
А вот интересно, на сайте Тушинского районного суда, приговор в отношении Ермаковой А.М. за сутенерство это про ту самую "богиню" или просто тёзка?) https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/tushinskij/services/cases/criminal/details/ff8e19f5-6a88-4180-835e-804a7535becb?participant=Ермакова+А.М.
👍6🤡2
Жесть, это правда🙈
💯13
Народ, вы серьезно? 5к человек собрались, пишите, обсуждаете Баранова?! 😤 Вам так скучно живется? Или в чем мотивация?! 😅😅 интересно стало🤔
File, posted without a caption
❤1
О любви в семьях к своим родным
🤣18💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @uspehneiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Успех Неизбежен!” (@uspehneiz), 738 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uspehneiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.