Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -510. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,918–23,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 20:57
22,994
-90
18 Sept 2026, 16:58
23,084
-27
16 Sept 2026, 08:18
23,111
-10
14 Sept 2026, 17:01
23,121
-24
13 Sept 2026, 01:59
23,145
-15
11 Sept 2026, 03:01
23,160
-23
8 Sept 2026, 01:38
23,183
-37
4 Sept 2026, 23:42
23,220
-14
3 Sept 2026, 09:19
23,234
-7
2 Sept 2026, 01:52
23,241
-9
1 Sept 2026, 04:28
23,250
-15
31 Aug 2026, 07:34
23,265
-23
30 Aug 2026, 08:47
23,288
-7
29 Aug 2026, 07:04
23,295
-14
28 Aug 2026, 03:33
23,309
+1
27 Aug 2026, 05:34
23,308
-9
25 Aug 2026, 09:44
23,317
-5
24 Aug 2026, 06:34
23,322
-19
22 Aug 2026, 14:02
23,341
-7
21 Aug 2026, 05:49
23,348
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,060
Videos
≈93
Links
≈5,790
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
706 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🕊
401
56.8%
😎
95
13.5%
❤
77
10.9%
😇
44
6.23%
🆒
25
3.54%
🐳
21
2.97%
👏
19
2.69%
❤🔥
14
1.98%
🔥
4
0.567%
🎉
3
0.425%
🏆
3
0.425%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @usnfees. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 1 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Dengan adanya pemberitahuan ini, kami ingin menyampaikan bahwa base Usnfess akan ditutup sementara waktu.
Keputusan ini kami ambil sebagai langkah evaluasi menyeluruh atas situasi yang belakangan terjadi, sekaligus sebagai upaya untuk melakukan perubahan yang ada di dalam internal admin usnfess. Kami menyadari bahwa masih terdapat banyak hal yang perlu diperbaiki, baik dari segi sistem, komunikasi, maupun pengelolaa…
Dengan adanya kegaduhan yang telah ada, saya sendiri Karina ( @Rrefresh ) mengundurkan diri sebagai owner usnfess sebagai rasa tanggung jawab saya atas kejadian yang telah terjadi, serta sebagai bahan evaluasi untuk saya pribadi. Untuk kedepannya owner baru akan di diskusikan di grup admin tetap usnfess dalam menjalankan base.
Selain itu, admin Dinda ( @enndut ) dan Ay ( @Jiyeon ) juga mengundurkan diri dari @usnfee…
Halo semuanya, di sini saya @rrefresh, @enndut dan @Jiyeon sebagai perwakilan dari seluruh pihak Usnfess ingin menyampaikan permohonanan maaf sebesar-besarnya atas situasi yang tidak kondusif, yang bermula dari kesalahan kami sendiri.
Kami menyadari bahwa dalam proses penyampaian diskusi yang terjadi, terdapat kata-kata yang kurang tepat, kurang sopan, menyinggung, dan menyakiti beberapa pihak (khususnya @usnholics,…
#PPCANON ft. USNFESS.
ㅤㅤ
𝄞.˚／ Atwixt kaleidoscopic schadenfreude, the vanguardʼs intricate hymns masked their sorrow with melting chords. While lyrical, illuminescne an avant-garde throughout these usernames:
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ𖦽 @RMARTiN
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ𖦽 @RMARTiN
Usernames are oueveres Martin from Cortis, incorporating potential via letter additional neath (R). Stepping into sphere of chords, an offer commences on 28 March 2026 and conclud…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @usnfees. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“USNFESS.” (@usnfees), 22,994 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usnfees.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
