Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for USMLE and LIFE

Channel

USMLE and LIFE

@usmleandlife

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,226subscribers

+78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002288553995
TypeChannel
Username@usmleandlife
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/usmleandlife

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

10,700 average views per post against 8,226 subscribers — an engagement rate of 129.8%. Across the 87,389 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers — the middle half sit between 5.80% and 24.1%, with a median of 12.4%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured27 of 30 published in the window (2 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled288,382
Mature posts only134.7% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,226 measured 14 August 2026
Cohortb3162 · 87,389 channels · p10 2.42% · p25 5.80% · p50 12.4% · p75 24.1% · p90 41.2%
Position in cohort99.399th percentile · 10.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.044% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,1318,2268,178.57 August 2026 — 8,148 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,139 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,131 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,226 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,117–8,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:588,226+95
11 Aug 2026, 14:238,131-8
8 Aug 2026, 15:448,139-9
7 Aug 2026, 18:018,148no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:528,148first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.8%
avg views ÷ 8,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.144%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held30 (18 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total288,382
Reactions total412
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

412 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15236.9%
😁10625.7%
🔥4210.2%
307.28%
custom 5415803084213329506266.31%
👍266.31%
🎉245.83%
👏40.971%
🥰20.485%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 412reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC222 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Aksariyat insonlar, “xarobadan chiqqan millioner” kabi voqealarni sevib tinglashadi. Chunki boyni yanada boyishi hech kimga qiziq emas. Lekin… Boyni boyish ehtimoli, kambag’alni boyish ehtimolidan ANCHA yuqori. Shuning uchun haqiqatga tik boqish o’rniga, imkoni deyarli yo’q narsalar bilan o’zimizni ovutishga harakat qilamiz. Siz muvaffaqiyatli deb hisoblagan insonlarni 99,9%, boy oilada tug’ilgan yoki boy oila b

9👍3🔥31👏1😁1

11 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,240 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @davronbekturdiev_jamiyati

Haqiqiy qo'l bilan ushlab, hisoblab ko'rsa bo'ladigan natija xohlasangiz haqiqiy harakat qilishingiz kerak. Eng yomoni haqiqiy harakat doim yoqimsiz — nimanidir takrorlash kerak, nimanidir ko'rish kerak, o'qish kerak, o'ylash kerak. Yotib orzu qilib, amalga oshirib bo'lmaydi. Mana shu joyida odamlar o'zi bilan o'zi kelisha olmaydi. Shuni hisobiga real natija ko'pchilikda yo'q.

19🔥111🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC≈17,300 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🩺 Medical English o‘rganmoqchimisiz, lekin qayerdan boshlashni bilmayapsizmi? Ko‘pchilik tibbiyotda ingliz tilini o‘rganayotganda shu muammoga duch keladi. Tibbiy inglizcha kitoblarni o‘qimoqchi bo‘ladi, lekin medical terminlar chiqsa qiynaladi. Medical article o‘qiganda ko‘p so‘zlarni tarjima qilishga to‘g‘ri keladi. Bemor bilan ingliz tilida gaplashish esa yanada qiyin tuyuladi. Shuning uchun biz kursni 0 dan bo

5😁3👏1

11 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

7 yoshli bolada tez-tez sinusit va otit kuzatiladi, ayniqsa kapsulali bakterial infeksiyalar qaytalanadi. Qaysi immunoglobulin yetishmovchiligi eng ehtimoliy? A) IgA B) IgG

  1. A54%
  2. B46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,670 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/+GPMPKrlOXadhNWEy tashlanayotgan savollarni shu guruhda tahlil qilamiz)

2

9 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC≈28,500 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ko‘pchilik tibbiyotda ingliz tilini o‘rganishni boshlaganda bir narsani tushunadi: Oddiy ingliz tilini bilish boshqa, tibbiy ingliz tili esa butunlay boshqa. Masalan, ingliz tilini bilasiz, lekin tibbiy kitoblarni o‘qishda qiynalasiz. Medical article o‘qiyotganda har bir terminni alohida tarjima qilasiz. USMLE haqida o‘ylaganda esa Medical English ham alohida muammo bo‘lib qoladi. Aslida bularni asta-sekin, tiz

7🔥6

8 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,300 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

1-ўринни олибам ютқизиш мумкинакан мана😂🤦🏻‍♂️ Medical English kursiga qo‘shilish @Ulifeadmin

😁404🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC≈9,760 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 MEDICAL ENGLISH’NI O‘RGANISHNI ORQAGA SURAVERMANG! Siz tibbiyot sohasida o‘qiyapsiz yoki ishlayapsiz, lekin ingliz tilidagi medical terminlar, patient history yoki klinik matnlarni tushunishda qiynalasizmi? Unda bu kurs aynan siz uchun! 👨‍⚕️📚 🔥 2 OYLIK MEDICAL ENGLISH KURSI Bu oddiy General English kursi emas. Bu kursda siz tibbiyotda HAR KUNI kerak bo‘ladigan ingliz tilini o‘rganasiz: 🩺 Medical terminology 🗣

🎉421

6 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈2,660 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ba'zida o'ylab qolaman, muvaffaqiyatli odamlarni boshqalardan ajratib turadigan eng katta farq nima ekan? Mening fikrimcha, bu iste'dod ham emas, omad ham emas. Eng katta farq — ular to'xtab qolmaydi. Shunday kunlar bo'ladiki, umuman dars qilishni xohlamaysiz. Kitobni ochsangiz ham fikringiz boshqa joyda bo'ladi. Testlar yomon chiqadi. O'zingizga bo'lgan ishonch ham pasayadi. Oldinlari shunday paytlarda men ham "er

3414

6 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,230 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

B guruhimiz ham to'lay deb qoldi ushbu ajoyib imkoniyatdan bebahra qolmang)😊

🎉6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @usmleandlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz334 voters

7 yoshli bolada tez-tez sinusit va otit kuzatiladi, ayniqsa kapsulali bakterial infeksiyalar qaytalanadi. Qaysi immunoglobulin yetishmovchiligi eng ehtimoliy? A) IgA B) IgG

  1. A54%
  2. B46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTCAnonymous Poll543 voters

Kayfiyatlar qanday?

  1. Zo‘r )35%
  2. Yashab yuribmiz(71%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz607 voters

🦠 Microbiology Quiz Diareya, qorin og‘rig‘i va antibiotik qabul qilgandan keyin psevdomembranoz kolit rivojlandi. Eng ehtimoliy qo‘zg‘atuvchi qaysi? A) Escherichia coli B) Clostridioides difficile

  1. A50%
  2. B50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,968 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“USMLE and LIFE” (@usmleandlife), 8,226 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usmleandlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.