Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Santy reviews

@user_santy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398896343
TypeChannel
Username@user_santy
Created13 December 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/user_santy

Growth

912 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 9 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:18 — 9 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:0112 Aug 2026, 13:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:189no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:019first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2057.1%
🤡1028.6%
❤‍🔥38.57%
💅12.86%
💘12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2024 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Oct 2025, 14:53 UTC806 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мой новый юз: @doxbens

🤡6❤‍🔥31💘1

23 Oct 2025, 13:04 UTC847 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@user_santy купил у меня нфт, сделка была через бота +rep

2

6 Oct 2025, 12:59 UTC906 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@user_santy кросс четкий пацан

2🤡2

6 Oct 2025, 08:57 UTC866 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не толстопузый, чотко сделал не наебал @user_santy

2

5 Oct 2025, 22:46 UTC736 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@user_santy сука спасибо большое хоть кто то не наебщик

2

5 Oct 2025, 17:40 UTC632 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@user_santy просто лучший провел сделку быстро и качественно советую 💋

2

5 Oct 2025, 17:38 UTC516 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

2💅1

5 Oct 2025, 17:38 UTC456 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Заказал у @cryns себе нфт за 300 рублей блять!! , спасибо реально большое❤️❤️

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @user_santy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 967,815 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Santy reviews” (@user_santy), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/user_santy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.