Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

美国观察

@us_watch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,818subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370746032
TypeChannel
Username@us_watch
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/us_watch

Growth

1,8181,8221,8206 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,819 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,817–1,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:151,818-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:311,819-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:451,822no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:371,822first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 15:09 UTC553 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

“我不能这么做,因为这么做有违我的信仰。” —— 这是信仰自由。 “你不能这么做,因为这么做有违我的信仰。” —— 这不是什么信仰自由。 source

2

5 May 2026, 15:08 UTC529 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

优步:要遵守法律?那我们还怎么赚钱? 谷歌:不让垄断?那我们还怎么赚钱? 雀巢:不让压榨劳工?那我们还怎么赚钱? openAI:不让窃取信息?那我们还怎么赚钱? (与此同时) 媒体:在超市偷东西的小偷是否应当判处死刑,以儆效尤? source

2

5 May 2026, 15:08 UTC436 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

=== 创造历史的性少数女性 === 1. 弗里达·卡罗 弗里达·卡罗是一位墨西哥裔双性恋艺术家。她不仅凭借作品中蕴含的力量与激情成为了享誉国际的文化偶像,也因其一生中所承受的苦难而备受瞩目。18岁时,一场车祸给她留下了严重的后遗症。此后,她开始投身绘画。她的作品包含大量自画像,充满对墨西哥文化的热爱,也展现了她作为一名身心障碍人的生活体验。 2. 玛莎·P·约翰逊 玛莎·P·约翰逊是一位非裔美国跨性别女性。她是性少数权益活动家,也是为有色人种跨性别群体无畏发声的倡导者。1969年,约翰逊领导了石墙起义;随后,她与西尔维娅·里维拉共同创立了“街头跨性别行动革命者”组织,致力于为纽约市无家可归的跨性别青年提供援助。如今,多所机构继承了玛莎的精神遗产,包括玛莎·P·约翰逊研究所,其宗旨为保护并捍卫黑人跨性别群体的各项人权。 3. 奥德雷·洛德 奥德雷·洛德是一位美国作家、女权主义者、女性主义者、图书管理员及民权活动家。当谈起自

5 May 2026, 15:07 UTC237 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

=== 直面关于“家长权利运动”的四个谎言 === * 什么是“家长权利”运动? 在加拿大各地,一些团体正以“家长权利”为名瞄准性少数学生,践踏性少数学生在学校的安全感和归属感,推动危及学生安全的政策,例如: 强制披露 - 强制学校在学生更改昵称或人称代词时告知家长。 限制使用 - 限制学生使用包容性洗手间和更衣室。 课程禁令 - 禁止或限制与性少数相关的教材或课程内容。 * 谎言一:“家长应该完全掌控孩子的生活” 孩子不是财产。 《加拿大权利与自由宪章》从没有提到“家长权利”几个字,它保障的是所有人的权利,包括儿童。 虽然《加拿大权利与自由宪章》赋予了每个人信仰和价值观的自由,但并不允许家长以此为由限制孩子的言论和表达自由。 1993年,加拿大法院裁定,在所有涉及孩子的情况下,必须优先考虑“孩子的最佳利益”。 在决定什么是“孩子的最佳利益”时,加拿大作为《联合国儿童权利公约》的签署国,承认: 儿童有权接受教育并形成自己的观

5 May 2026, 15:06 UTC187 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translateVideo

“你反对现有的专利政策?你是说那个发明iPhone的人,难道没有权利用自己的发明来挣钱吗?” 首先,我把这个评论贴出来举例子,不是为了嘲笑任何人。“发明某个东西的人用那个东西挣钱天经地义”的想法是一个很普遍的思维陷阱。这个思维陷阱基于的是作家安·兰德的思想 —— 某几个“伟大”的人创造了一切,并应得一切奖励。 iPhone很难说是“一种”发明,而是很多很多个发明的集合,包括液晶技术、晶体管技术、互联网、触摸屏、语音识别... 而所有这些技术的发明,都要感谢公共资金拨款支持,和无数拿着微薄薪资的研究人员的研究。 绝大多数受益广大人民的发明,都是很多很多人共同努力和共同支持下的产物。iPhone也不例外。某个伟大的天才白人在专利政策的激励下以一己之力创造出了某个东西,因此有权获得销售这个东西得来的巨资,只是资本主义创造出的神话而已。 source

1

21 Apr 2026, 01:42 UTC389 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

40小时工作制已经过时了,我们需要进一步的工时制度变革。 这是因为在1886年干草市场起义争取40小时工作制的年代,工人往往仰赖于他们的妻子来替他们完成各种家务和杂务。而现在很多人不仅需要工作,回家还需要再做家务和杂务。如果我们还保持一周工作40个小时的工作要求的话,很多人会长期处于精疲力竭的状态。 source

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @us_watch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“美国观察” (@us_watch), 1,818 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/us_watch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.