“我不能这么做,因为这么做有违我的信仰。” —— 这是信仰自由。 “你不能这么做,因为这么做有违我的信仰。” —— 这不是什么信仰自由。 source

Channel
美国观察·翻译内容
@us_translate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
448subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001531226263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @us_translate |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/us_translate |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 448 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 450 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 451 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 451 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
“你反对现有的专利政策?你是说那个发明iPhone的人,难道没有权利用自己的发明来挣钱吗?” 首先,我把这个评论贴出来举例子,不是为了嘲笑任何人。“发明某个东西的人用那个东西挣钱天经地义”的想法是一个很普遍的思维陷阱。这个思维陷阱基于的是作家安·兰德的思想 —— 某几个“伟大”的人创造了一切,并应得一切奖励。 iPhone很难说是“一种”发明,而是很多很多个发明的集合,包括液晶技术、晶体管技术、互联网、触摸屏、语音识别... 而所有这些技术的发明,都要感谢公共资金拨款支持,和无数拿着微薄薪资的研究人员的研究。 绝大多数受益广大人民的发明,都是很多很多人共同努力和共同支持下的产物。iPhone也不例外。某个伟大的天才白人在专利政策的激励下以一己之力创造出了某个东西,因此有权获得销售这个东西得来的巨资,只是资本主义创造出的神话而已。 source
这幅画的作者是法蒂玛·沃约哈特。她是一位来自阿富汗喀布尔的画家,现逃难暂居在美国的马萨诸塞州。 沃约哈特经常在她的画作中控诉阿富汗的压抑现状。在这幅作品中,身穿镶着金色花纹的亮红色连衣裙的小女孩正在玩跳房子,而三名武装持枪的男子却将枪瞄准在了小女孩的头部。 跳房子的方块里,分别写着“学校”、“工作”、“高等教育”。女孩的运动鞋落在“梦想”之上,而那遥不可及的下一格里,写着的是“自由”。 source
40小时工作制已经过时了,我们需要进一步的工时制度变革。 这是因为在1886年干草市场起义争取40小时工作制的年代,工人往往仰赖于他们的妻子来替他们完成各种家务和杂务。而现在很多人不仅需要工作,回家还需要再做家务和杂务。如果我们还保持一周工作40个小时的工作要求的话,很多人会长期处于精疲力竭的状态。 source
1859年,约翰·布朗率众在哈伯斯费里举事,要求废除奴隶制,并解放了许多奴隶。同年,因举事失利,约翰·布朗被处以绞刑。 source
传播已久的谎言:人类正在毁灭地球 基于事实的真相:正在毁灭地球的根本不是全人类,而是大概九十个具体的人,我们甚至可以一个个报出这些人的名字。 说真的,对地球造成巨大污染的石油财阀和工业财阀加起来,也就是三辆公交车的人 —— 环境污染的源头就是这些人,不是什么“全人类”。 source
甲:有一天人们在生育孩子之前必须先取得许可和认证,需要经过适当的学习,并提供心理和身体健康方面的证明。我想这一天会到来的! 乙:这就是纳粹提出的优生学那一套吧,真不敢相信那么多人觉得这会是什么好想法... 丙:这就是丹麦的政策,格陵兰原住民因为这个政策受害极深。大约有5%的格陵兰原住民儿童被从充满爱心且有能力抚养孩子的双亲身边夺走,因为所谓的育儿测试按照丹麦白人的文化习俗制定的正确答案,完全无视了原住民的文化习俗。如果在美国实施这些测试的话,测试肯定会严重偏向美国白人的文化,任何不符合这一标准的群体 —— 比如美洲原住民家庭、黑人家庭,肯定会受到很大的刁难。我是原住民,我们的育儿传统至今仍不断受到白人政府和“育儿规范”的质疑,很多原住民母亲仅仅因为与孩子同睡、使用摇篮板、传统背带,或是胆敢教孩子我们自己的文化,就遭到了无尽的指责和处罚。你觉得如果我们政府搞什么“生育许可”,会是什么好消息吗? source
代际创伤挺奇怪的一点,就是它也许看起来并不像创伤。它更可能体现在一些莫名其妙的小事上,看似毫无道理,但是每个人的妈妈都会不约而同地去做这些事。 source
科研专家:这种病现有的诊断标准让很多病人无法获得诊断 公益组织:传播科研专家的信息,帮助更多病人了解自己的病情 医疗机构:开始根据研究结果拓宽诊断标准 获诊病人:终于得以了解自己的病情 无良媒体:神秘怪病正在疯狂扩散!世界要完了! source
我主张的女权主义,不是什么“女性应该和男性一样被征兵”,而是“没有任何性别的人应该被征兵因为征兵违背了基本的身体自主权”。 强制征兵这件事情本就不该存在。没有任何人有权利强迫另一个人去冒生命危险。如果没有足够多的人愿意自愿加入当前的战事,那说明这个战事本来就不该继续打下去了。既然政府没有权利强迫民众捐献自己的肾脏,那也不应该有权利强迫民众冒着生命危险去参加一场Ta们本人根本不同意或者根本不关心的战事。 很多人夸赞以色列,说以色列不仅强制男性服兵役,也强制女性服兵役,做到了包容和平等。包容平等让每个人都有机会屠杀巴勒斯坦人?包容平等让每个人都有机会为自己并不同意战事“献身”?真是见鬼了。 source
如果你能申请某项社会福利,请尽管去申请。使用的人数多了,政客在裁减开支的时候就不会去动这个项目。这样,将来有相关需要的人也能获得帮助。 这是助己也是助人。 source
只要你开始对所谓的“问题少年矫正产业”但凡有一点真正的了解,你都会感受到前所未有的愤怒和荒谬。这个行业从概念到实际操作,没有一处不是充满了罪恶。你大叫“难道没人发现这里的邪恶吗”,却发现毫无回声,你的声音被淹没在了社会的“习以为常”里,因为“矫正”常态之外的孩子,正是维系和制造所谓的常态的一环。是时候为青少年的权利而斗争了! 问题少年矫正产业,军队产业,青少年监狱产业,青少年行为治疗产业 —— 在我们的社会你可以合法从事虐待青少年和孩子的工作,甚至选择还不少呢! source
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @us_translate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,563,713 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“美国观察·翻译内容” (@us_translate), 448 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/us_translate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.