Channel
@urgenciasyemergencias
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,957subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001134534135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @urgenciasyemergencias |
| Created | 6 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/urgenciasyemergencias |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 14,957 | +6 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 14,951 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 14,949 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 14,955 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 14,963 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 14,964 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 14,969 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 14,982 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 14,984 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 14,983 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 14,992 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 14,989 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 14,991 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 14,985 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 14,982 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 14,980 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 14,982 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 14,988 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 14,991 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 14,988 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
305 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 252 | 82.6% | |
| 👏 | 29 | 9.51% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 7.21% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.656% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Llevamos ya 36 niños fallecidos por ahogamiento este año en España. El año pasado hablé de esto en la radio, en la sección de salud que tuve en RNE. Y como cada año, vuelvo a tocar el tema (sí, la misma cantinela, pero es que las claves no cambian). Lo que sí cambia este año es que tengo algo nuevo que compartir: la Academia Americana de Pediatría acaba de publicar su documento de posicionamiento sobre prevención d…
❤14👏5
🆕 NUEVO POST 🆕 Sabemos que la supervivencia de un paciente en parada cardíaca depende de nuestra excelencia técnica en el box o en la calle, y que esa destreza se forja a base de horas de formación y simulacros. Sin embargo, cuando intentamos demostrar científicamente qué método de enseñanza salva más vidas, nos topamos con un muro metodológico: hasta ahora, cada hospital y unidad docente medía el éxito de sus curs…
❤20👏7👍1
La AEMPS informa del cese de comercialización y retirada del mercado del dispositivo antiatragantamientos DAEM https://www.aemps.gob.es/informa/la-aemps-informa-del-cese-de-comercializacion-y-retirada-del-mercado-del-dispositivo-antiatragantamientos-daem/#
👏7❤3
Documento de consenso sobre el manejo de pacientes con hipotermia accidental de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR), la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) y la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) https://revistaemergencias.org/articulo/documento-de-consenso-sobre-el-manejo-de-pacientes-con-hipo…
❤7👍1
Manejo del estado epiléptico en urgencias: revisión sistemática y actualización clínica Autores: Raúl Alonso Avilés, Cesáreo Fernández Alonso, Félix González Martínez, Manuel Liñán López, en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de NeuroSEMES Enlace en Revista EMERGENCIAS: https://revistaemergencias.org/numeros-anteriores/volumen-38/numero-3/manejo-del-estado-epileptico-en-urgencias-revision-sistematica-y-actualizaci…
❤9
¿Cómo hacer un electrocardiograma correctamente? ➡️ La guía definitiva. Es inviable seguir algunas de estas recomendaciones respecto al confort del paciente y preparación de la piel en emergencias, urgencias y paciente crítico, pero seguro que el tema de colocación de electrodos, dextrocardia y muchas cositas más, sí que os sirven 😊 https://www.urgenciasyemergen.com/como-hacer-un-electrocardiograma-correctamente-gu…
❤21
👁️ Las bebidas energéticas no son un refresco, son un riesgo clínico documentado. Acaba de publicarse en la Revista Española de Urgencias y Emergencias (REUE) una revisión sistemática de de Rodríguez-Cabrera et al, con 98 casos clínicos sobre los efectos adversos de estas bebidas. Los hallazgos deberían ser de lectura obligatoria para cualquier profesional de la salud. ¿Y la regulación? España da por fin un paso r…
❤26👍8👏3👎1
¿Sabías que esas tijeras para cortar la ropa de los kit de #DEA podrían estar robándonos segundos vitales en la #desfibrilación? Un nuevo estudio de 2026 publicado en Resuscitation Plus revela que el grupo que usó tijeras tardó una mediana de 24 segundos más en dar la descarga que quienes simplemente tiraron de la ropa o desabotonaron. ¡Y ojo 👁️!, que usar tijeras no mejoró ni un poco la precisión al colocar los pa…
❤16👏1
¿Tiene tu paciente sobrecarga de volumen? ¿Cuándo sospechar sobrecarga de volumen? ¿Cómo evaluar la sobrecarga de volumen? Te respondo a estas dudas con el análisis de un estudio en este carrusel. Te recomiendo que visites el artículo real y veas el apartado multimedia donde explican los procedimientos ecográficos. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2845382 Lo del suerito a chorro nunca me gustó…
❤11
¿Sabías que los vasopresores administrados por vía periférica son seguros en urgencias? Lo sabemos desde hace años, pero un metaanálisis de 49 estudios y más de 33.000 catéteres lo confirma. La incidencia de eventos adversos graves con catéter corto es prácticamente 0% — y en 6 de cada 10 casos se evitó el acceso venoso central. Echa un ojo al pdf para conocer los datos por agente vasopresor, las diferencias entr…
❤18
🚨 NUEVAS GUÍAS SEPSIS 2026 — Lo que cambia en tu práctica clínica La Surviving Sepsis Campaign acaba de publicar la mayor actualización de sus guías: 129 recomendaciones elaboradas por 69 expertos de 23 países. He analizado TODO el documento y te lo resumo en mi web: ➡️ qSOFA fuera del cribado, vasopresores periféricos, betalactámicos con evidencia ALTA, hipotensión permisiva en mayores de 65 años, cánulas nasales de…
❤15
¿Es posible la #desfibrilación exitosa en pacientes con #hipotermia accidental severa y ritmos desfibrilables? Un nuevo estudio retrospectivo observacional del Registro Internacional de Hipotermia aporta evidencia clínica clave para el manejo de la parada cardíaca con #temperatura central ≤ 30°C. 📊 Datos destacados: 🔹 Se incluyeron 37 pacientes en #PCR hipotérmica con ritmos desfibrilables (20 desfibrilados antes d…
❤21👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @urgenciasyemergencias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Urgencias y Emergencias” (@urgenciasyemergencias), 14,957 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urgenciasyemergencias.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.