Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for urbanteller

Channel

urbanteller

@urbanteller

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

198subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002680626849
TypeChannel
Username@urbanteller
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/urbanteller

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1951991977 August 2026 — 199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 199 subscribers24 August 2026 — 198 subscribers25 September 2026 — 195 subscribers7 October 2026 — 198 subscribers1987 August 20267 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 61 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 194–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 12:37198+3
25 Sept 2026, 21:56195-3
24 Aug 2026, 00:48198-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:32199no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:59199first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3449.3%
😁2130.4%
😱57.25%
😢34.35%
🤔34.35%
👏22.90%
🔥11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 16:08 UTC177 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

как представлю, комментарии прям сами просятся

😁4👍3

6 Feb 2026, 13:44 UTC316 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Крупнейший застройщик обратился к государству за помощью. А ведь было время когда он попадал в новостные заголовки по другим, более неожиданным, поводам. Не помогло.

👍4🤔1😁1

4 Feb 2026, 16:41 UTC254 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

на модной архитектуре от MR Group и сосульки смотрятся красивее

👍4😱3👏2😢1

22 Jan 2026, 16:53 UTC278 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

интересно что про самую частую проблему этого застройщика - протекающие/продувающие окна, ничего даже и не сказали. но пожалуй это и не проблема вовсе на таком фоне.

👍1

22 Jan 2026, 16:51 UTC269 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Наглядный пример от одного из самых модных нынче застройщиков бизнес класса (сам застройщик называет это "премиум"). Проблема видать настолько масштабная что даже до ТВ дошли. Качество от ПИК выглядит довольно достойно на таком фоне, а если ещё учесть ценник и весь пафос MR Group...

👍4😁2😢2

19 Jan 2026, 16:56 UTC277 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ещё немного реновации

😁3😱2

19 Jan 2026, 15:55 UTC288 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда решил не переплачивать за новостройку от застройщика и взял реновацию. Снаружи то одинаково выглядит, свежее новое красивое. А внутри так прям по-домашнему... Неочевидно, но на фото общий, межквартирный коридор.

👍7😁2

16 Jan 2026, 19:12 UTC271 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По итогам декабря 2025 средний ценник за московскую внутримкадную квартиру перевалил за 30 млн рублей. Немало. Ещё более впечатляет что это почти 400к долларов. И тем не менее потолок не пробит, бывало и поболее - в 2007 квартиры (в долларах) стоили ещё дороже.

👍5🤔1

14 Jan 2026, 18:47 UTC283 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Натолкнулся на интересное мнение касаемо подъездов на уровне земли, без крыльца. Но не разделяю его. В снежные зимы и в сильные ливни действительно бывает что описанная проблема образуется, но вход в дом без ступеней это не про "красиво", это про удобно. Это новый стандарт комфортного жилья, такой же каким стал лифт в своё время. И например подземные паркинги, а именно въезды в них, от осадков страдают ещё больше, н…

👍4🤔1

11 Jan 2026, 16:19 UTC279 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Гляжу объявления на вторичке - 2025 оставил свой тяжёлый след на рынке недвижимости.

😁9👍2🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @urbanteller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“urbanteller” (@urbanteller), 198 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urbanteller.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.