Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Urban Tecno

Channel

Urban Tecno

@urbantecno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

2,031subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001027294743
TypeChannel
Username@urbantecno
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/urbantecno

Growth

2,0312,0472,0395 August 2026 — 2,047 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,047 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,040 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,036 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,032 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,031 subscribers5 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,029–2,049 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 04:132,031-1
23 Aug 2026, 00:222,032-4
16 Aug 2026, 15:242,036-3
13 Aug 2026, 04:152,039-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:512,040-6
6 Aug 2026, 21:522,046-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:202,047no change
5 Aug 2026, 18:472,047first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.04%
avg views ÷ 2,031 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (27 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total246
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍250.0%
👎125.0%
🤮125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Y tú, ¿con cuál te quedas? 🤔

  1. 📖 Fold8 Ultra29%
  2. 📱S26 Ultra71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤔 Tengo el S26 Ultra… ¿merece la pena pasarme al Fold8 Ultra? ❓Dos móviles, la misma mesa, y una pregunta que llevo días intentando responder de verdad: si ya tienes lo mejor de Samsung en formato tradicional, ¿tiene sentido pagar 800€ más por cambiar de forma? 👉🎬 Comparariva completa

4 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC150 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤯 Así llevo todo MI CANAL desde un MÓVIL que casi NO ABRO 🆕 Convertimos el Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 en nuestro centro de trabajo y multimedia 👉🎬 Video completo

27 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC274 viewsread 7 August 2026

📱Fold8 Ultra, Fold8 y Flip8: toda la gama plegable de Samsung, ¿cuál es la tuya? ❗️¿Por primera vez Samsung lanza TRES plegables de golpe y no sabes cuál elegir? Cuidado, porque equivocarte de modelo te puede costar más de 1000 euros de diferencia. 👉 No te lo pierdas

23 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC311 viewsread 7 August 2026

📱📖 Samsung Galaxy Fold8 Ultra vs Fold 8: las diferencias 🧐 ¿Vale la pena ahorrarse 200€ o es una trampa de Samsung? Ponemos cara a cara el Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold8 para ver dónde están los recortes de verdad. 👉🎬 Video completo

21 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC293 viewsread 7 August 2026

👉📱MEJORES móviles 2026 🔝 ¿Buscas móvil nuevo a mitad de año y no quieres tirar el dinero? Ponemos orden en el mercado con la guía definitiva de los 13 mejores móviles que puedes comprar en julio de 2026, organizados tramo a tramo según tu presupuesto. 🎬 Vídeo completo

20 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC278 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💻 Zephyrus G14 (2026) análisis: ¿el mejor portátil compacto con Windows? 🚀El ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 con Ryzen AI 9 465 y RTX 5060 es la review que no esperábamos escribir así. Un portátil gaming que no pesa ni bulta como uno. 👉🎬 Review completa

👍1

16 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC329 viewsread 7 August 2026

📺 Samsung ha arreglado el MAYOR problema de las OLED (S99H Review) 👀 ¿Es la mejor compra de 2026 o su precio es demasiado alto? Te cuento para qué tipo de usuario es esta tele (y para quién NO es), qué funciones de IA debes desactivar el primer día y qué tal rinde su sonido integrado frente a una barra Q-Symphony. 👉 Review completa

19 Jun 2026, 13:55 UTC540 viewsread 7 August 2026

🛜 Se acabó el mal Wi-Fi: Cómo llevar tu conexión a cualquier habitación. 🔧 Arreglar tu conexión a Internet no requiere de conocimientos técnicos, de cambios en el router de tu operadora o de instalaciones adicionales. Te hablamos del FRITZ!Mesh Set 1700, una red Mesh que soluciona los tirones y las malas conexiones de otros sistemas tradicionales, como los repetidores. 👉🎬 Descúbrelo

9 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTC537 viewsread 7 August 2026

📱🆚 iPhone 17 vs Samsung S26 vs Xiaomi 17, ¿cuál es el mejor móvil compacto? 🔥 Comparamos a fondo los tres grandes móviles compactos de este 2026 👉 Comparativa completa

2 Jun 2026, 12:54 UTC594 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔥El Xiaomi MÁS BRUTAL del año (y su peso lo demuestra) 🤔 ¿Es el Xiaomi 17T Pro el mejor móvil que puedes comprar por menos de 1000 euros este año? 👉 Descúbrelo todo en la review completa

26 May 2026, 12:07 UTC579 viewsread 7 August 2026

⌚️ Lo que el OPPO Watch X3 hace mejor que otros smartwatch en 7 días 👔 Nos vestimos de gala para hablarte del nuevo OPPO Watch X3 👉 Descúbrelo todo

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @urbantecno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Y tú, ¿con cuál te quedas? 🤔

  1. 📖 Fold8 Ultra29%
  2. 📱S26 Ultra71%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Urban Tecno” (@urbantecno), 2,031 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urbantecno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.