kita selalu opengg ya gess, gaskeunn gacorin bot order @ordermarkhyuckbot atau gedorrr rc formless ke @kadezs π«°
β€4π2π 2β€βπ₯1π³1π1

Channel
@upsubsmarkhyuck
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
14,216subscribers
-142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003725526769 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @upsubsmarkhyuck |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/upsubsmarkhyuck |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 14,216 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 14,238 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 14,258 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 14,269 | -38 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 14,307 | -48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 14,355 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 14,358 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 14,358 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (11 July 2026 β 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,618 |
| Reactions total | 253 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
660 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 70 | 10.6% | |
| π― | 58 | 8.79% | |
| π | 57 | 8.64% | |
| π₯ | 57 | 8.64% | |
| π³ | 52 | 7.88% | |
| π | 51 | 7.73% | |
| π | 51 | 7.73% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 44 | 6.67% | |
| π | 41 | 6.21% | |
| π | 41 | 6.21% | |
| π | 38 | 5.76% | |
| π | 37 | 5.61% | |
| π«‘ | 30 | 4.55% | |
| π | 27 | 4.09% | |
| π | 6 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 660reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
kita selalu opengg ya gess, gaskeunn gacorin bot order @ordermarkhyuckbot atau gedorrr rc formless ke @kadezs π«°
β€4π2π 2β€βπ₯1π³1π1
Halo semuanya, saya Myrabeth @eenyah selaku new owner @upsubsmarkhyuck ingin meluruskan topic https://t.me/terserahfess/585377 pada menfess tersebut sender mengaku ngaku di tipu nokwa avc oleh pemilik qris tersebut, pemilik qris tersebut ( Store Elly ) saya sendiri dan saya sama sekali tidak pernah menjual pernokosan. Sender tersebut juga tidak kunjung memberikan proof perihal penipuan yang dimaksud. Semisal memang sβ¦
π―28π«‘8π7β€6π₯4π³3π3β€βπ₯2
cek catalog nya yaa, kitaa open semua
Still opennn markiestt, jangan lupa untukkk cek catalog dan order ke @ordermarkhyuckbot atau formless ke @kadezs yapp! Happy 2k rnk & 2k testie juga for mark π€
β€3π«‘1
PPPPPPP OPEN FAST GUYSSS HAYUK SEND FORM KALIAN KE @ordermarkhyuckbot Bisa formless juga lohh ke @kadezs para etmin siap dibantai ch ch keramat kalian β€β€β€β€
π12π«‘8π³7π7β€6π 5π―5π5
Sticker, posted without a caption
π5β€3π3π3π³3π 3π3β€βπ₯2
tes tesss, siapa besok mulai skul
π14π6π₯5π3π³3β€2β€βπ₯2π2
halloooo markiessttt, di cek cek yukk catalognyaa kita readyy semua cataloggg, jangan lupaa send format ke @ordermarkhyuckbot atau formless ke @kadezs yapp!
β€6π4π³4π3π3π 3π3π3
00.00 ILY MARKIESTT π€
π10β€5β€βπ₯4π3π 3π―3π2π³2
btw kitaa open fastt semua catalog kecuali upsubs ba dan wtb yahh masih menunggu admin baruu, yukk kirim formatnya ke @ordermarkhyuckbot atau formless ke @kadezs yaw
π3π3β€2β€βπ₯2π2π³2π 2π―2
udah ya, ditunggu segera untuk masuk ke link gc sampai jam 19.00 hari ini sebelum diarahkan ke tahap selanjutnya
β€7β€βπ₯2π2π2π2π2π 2π2
malah bc ke bot order, maaf salah botππ
π8β€5π³4π4π3π 3β€βπ₯2π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @upsubsmarkhyuck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 577,179 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@upsubsmarkhyuck named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ£Ώ OPEN FAST | UPSUBS MARKHYUCKβ (@upsubsmarkhyuck), 14,216 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upsubsmarkhyuck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.