Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

π‘£Ώ OPEN FAST | UPSUBS MARKHYUCK

@upsubsmarkhyuck

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

14,216subscribers

-142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003725526769
TypeChannel
Username@upsubsmarkhyuck
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/upsubsmarkhyuck

Growth

14,21614,35814,2877 August 2026 β€” 14,358 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 14,358 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 14,355 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 14,307 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 14,269 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 14,258 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 14,238 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 14,216 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,195–14,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:4614,216-22
12 Aug 2026, 10:3414,238-20
11 Aug 2026, 10:1614,258-11
10 Aug 2026, 11:4814,269-38
9 Aug 2026, 11:3114,307-48
8 Aug 2026, 10:0814,355-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:3014,358no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2314,358first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
5.82%
avg views Γ· 14,216 subscribers
Avg views / post
827
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.10%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held22 (11 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total6,618
Reactions total253
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

660 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀7010.6%
πŸ’―588.79%
πŸ’˜578.64%
πŸ”₯578.64%
🐳527.88%
πŸ“517.73%
πŸ‘517.73%
❀‍πŸ”₯446.67%
πŸ†’416.21%
πŸ’…416.21%
πŸŽ‰385.76%
πŸ†375.61%
🫑304.55%
😭274.09%
πŸ‘60.909%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 660reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC401 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

kita selalu opengg ya gess, gaskeunn gacorin bot order @ordermarkhyuckbot atau gedorrr rc formless ke @kadezs 🫰

❀4πŸ“2πŸ’…2❀‍πŸ”₯1🐳1πŸ’˜1

8 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC584 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Halo semuanya, saya Myrabeth @eenyah selaku new owner @upsubsmarkhyuck ingin meluruskan topic https://t.me/terserahfess/585377 pada menfess tersebut sender mengaku ngaku di tipu nokwa avc oleh pemilik qris tersebut, pemilik qris tersebut ( Store Elly ) saya sendiri dan saya sama sekali tidak pernah menjual pernokosan. Sender tersebut juga tidak kunjung memberikan proof perihal penipuan yang dimaksud. Semisal memang s…

πŸ’―28🫑8πŸ’˜7❀6πŸ”₯4🐳3😭3❀‍πŸ”₯2

5 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC425 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Still opennn markiestt, jangan lupa untukkk cek catalog dan order ke @ordermarkhyuckbot atau formless ke @kadezs yapp! Happy 2k rnk & 2k testie juga for mark 🀍

❀3🫑1

20 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTCβ‰ˆ1,290 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026

PPPPPPP OPEN FAST GUYSSS HAYUK SEND FORM KALIAN KE @ordermarkhyuckbot Bisa formless juga lohh ke @kadezs para etmin siap dibantai ch ch keramat kalian ❀❀❀❀

πŸ“12🫑8🐳7πŸ‘7❀6πŸ’…5πŸ’―5😭5

19 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTCβ‰ˆ1,220 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😭5❀3πŸŽ‰3πŸ†3🐳3πŸ’…3πŸ†’3❀‍πŸ”₯2

19 Jul 2026, 11:47 UTCβ‰ˆ1,120 views43 reactionsread 13 August 2026

tes tesss, siapa besok mulai skul

πŸ‘14😭6πŸ”₯5πŸ“3🐳3❀2❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸŽ‰2

15 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTCβ‰ˆ1,130 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026

halloooo markiessttt, di cek cek yukk catalognyaa kita readyy semua cataloggg, jangan lupaa send format ke @ordermarkhyuckbot atau formless ke @kadezs yapp!

❀6πŸŽ‰4🐳4πŸ“3πŸ†3πŸ’…3πŸ’˜3πŸ†’3

12 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTCβ‰ˆ1,290 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026

00.00 ILY MARKIESTT 🀍

πŸ’˜10❀5❀‍πŸ”₯4πŸ“3πŸ’…3πŸ’―3πŸ†2🐳2

12 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTCβ‰ˆ1,210 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

btw kitaa open fastt semua catalog kecuali upsubs ba dan wtb yahh masih menunggu admin baruu, yukk kirim formatnya ke @ordermarkhyuckbot atau formless ke @kadezs yaw

πŸ’˜3πŸ†’3❀2❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ“2🐳2πŸ’…2πŸ’―2

12 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC981 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026

udah ya, ditunggu segera untuk masuk ke link gc sampai jam 19.00 hari ini sebelum diarahkan ke tahap selanjutnya

❀7❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ“2πŸŽ‰2πŸ†2πŸ‘2πŸ’…2πŸ’˜2

12 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC941 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026

malah bc ke bot order, maaf salah bot😭😭

😭8❀5🐳4πŸ’˜4πŸ“3πŸ’…3❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸŽ‰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @upsubsmarkhyuck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 577,179 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ‘£Ώ OPEN FAST | UPSUBS MARKHYUCK” (@upsubsmarkhyuck), 14,216 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upsubsmarkhyuck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.