Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Помыслы Цымбала

Channel

Помыслы Цымбала

@upsprodal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

379subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002658674187
TypeChannel
Username@upsprodal
DescriptionКанал Ильи Цымбалиста
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/upsprodal

Growth

3793 Sept 2026, 21:47 — 379 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 22:22 — 379 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 21:473 Sept 2026, 22:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 22:22379no change
3 Sept 2026, 21:47379first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.2%
avg views ÷ 379 subscribers
Avg views / post
186
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20263 September 2026)
Views total1,863
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
30
Links
102

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1931.7%
🔥1931.7%
😁1525.0%
💯46.67%
❤‍🔥11.67%
👍11.67%
🤩11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC67 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Тьфу Не тот контент выложил Исправляюсь

😁51🤩1

19 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Прикиньте, это склонированный голос. В видео по ссылке ниже, не мой) https://youtu.be/GG8ozP1Z18Y?is=s9XUUMsZt6v68glb И это тот случай, когда первое побуждение - обесценить ИИшно сгенерированный контент. Но по мере прослушивания стало понятно, что смыслы великолепные. И какая в хуй разница через какой аватар эти великолепные смыслы завернули. P.S. Мне настолько зашли смыслы, что перевел это в статью с дословным с

🔥2👍1

17 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC202 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Очень точное описание моего настроения, когда пригрузило объёмом и плотностью инфы про ИИ P.S. Карпатый - это тот, кто к разработке Claude Code вроде как имеет прямое отношение. https://youtu.be/26TuOJZm14w?is=7lDOppFfP4Yg4p16 Я хер его знает, что это за канал и что это за перевод. Может есть получше. Напишите, если найдёте. У меня тело не успевает за мозгом и перманентный охуевоз от этих скоростей Но чуйка подс

💯3🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC179 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Отец. Если я 72 не буду в такой форме пристрелите меня.

😁6🔥31

7 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC229 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4

7 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC210 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4

7 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC213 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4

4 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC189 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥4❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Автотаргет. Грубанули с целями. Один хер окупилось в первые 3 дня. У меня девушки учились на курсе по маркетингу. Дошли до модуля по запуску Яндекс Директ. Спроектировали с нейросетью структуру рекламного кабинета на автотаргете. Подготовили с нейросетью полностью заголовки и тексты объявлений. Заняло у них это дня два. Запустили рекламу. Оказалось, что технически не срабатывали цели в Директе. То есть инфа о

💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @upsprodal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Директ - это:

  1. То, куда скидывают дикпики36%
  2. Что-то про рекламу71%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Помыслы Цымбала” (@upsprodal), 379 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upsprodal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.