Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

International Relations & Security Analysis.

@upscir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,926subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001191935052
TypeChannel
Username@upscir
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/upscir

Growth

8,9268,9448,9357 August 2026 — 8,944 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,933 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,926 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,923–8,947 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:388,926-7
10 Aug 2026, 19:138,933-11
7 Aug 2026, 06:308,944no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:238,944first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.84%
avg views ÷ 8,926 subscribers
Avg views / post
610
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
25
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (11 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total15,261
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 03s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC123 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

International loans and aid to Pakistan should be based on strict Human Rights conditionalities. The Pakistani Military’s spending should be scrutinised and controlled. And the contrast between J&K and POJK should be displayed to the world, says Dr. Tehmeena Rizvi. Watch the full episode of this show for more insights. 🔗 https://youtu.be/DfD_uazkayg?si=56nnKNWbSSM5FPrE

11 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC159 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The truth about Pakistan-Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (POJK) can no longer be hidden. WATCH HERE ➡️ https://youtu.be/DfD_uazkayg?si=6MmphgTrdmiPQrsb

10 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC207 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The crisis in Pakistan-Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (POJK) has deep roots. Watch this TV show for a full understanding. 🔗 https://youtu.be/DfD_uazkayg?si=6MmphgTrdmiPQrsb

9 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

A must-watch show to understand what is happening in Pakistan-Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (POJK) and what the world should do about it. Full episode ➡️ https://youtu.be/DfD_uazkayg?si=6MmphgTrdmiPQrsb

8 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC271 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Why has Pakistan resorted to brutal crackdowns on innocent civilian protesters in POJK instead of resolving their genuine grievances? How are systematic human rights abuses in POJK creating a spiral of revolts that is haunting Pakistan? Why has political Islam not unified Pakistanis and what explains the failure of nation-building there after almost 80 years of independence? What are the roles and responsibilities

8 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC250 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Have you watched the latest episode of ‘Indian Diplomacy’ on the great Indian diaspora and how it is enhancing India’s power and influence in the world? 🔗 https://youtu.be/oNYNG9HYCm8?si=D50NrfzvHGOe1PKr

7 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC294 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Have you watched this special podcast by Raj Shamani that explains world affairs from A to Z? 🔗 https://youtu.be/H8VLl6Y77NQ?si=VGbTHt4zzOKtyXd6

6 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC292 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Wherever there is an Embassy, High Commission or Consulate of India, it is now highly approachable and accessible to the Diaspora to resolve their problems and strengthen their community. India’s missions abroad are a “home away from home” and are doing active diaspora Diplomacy, says Dr. Aarshi Dua. Watch the full episode of 'Indian Diplomacy' for more insights. 🔗 https://youtu.be/oNYNG9HYCm8?si=D50NrfzvHGOe1PKr

6 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC316 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Is Russia still a superpower? What has changed? Watch the full podcast to understand. VIEW HERE ➡️ https://youtu.be/H8VLl6Y77NQ?si=VGbTHt4zzOKtyXd6

5 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC312 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Who are India’s closest strategic partners in the world? Watch the full podcast to learn. 🔗 https://youtu.be/H8VLl6Y77NQ?si=VGbTHt4zzOKtyXd6

4 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC321 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Prolonged conventional inter-State war and military conflict are back in vogue. Why are countries engaging in direct, destructive and intractable fighting in the present era and is there no hope for stopping this descent into savagery? Do read Professor Sreeram Chaulia’s column in Hindustan Times and share your thoughts. 🗞️ https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/the-here-and-now-of-a-forever-war-period-russia-ukrai

4 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC292 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Have you read Professor Sreeram Chaulia’s column in today’s Hindustan Times on a matter of grave international concern?

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @upscir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@upscir edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 515,718 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“International Relations & Security Analysis.” (@upscir), 8,926 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upscir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.