Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

UPSC Course

@upsccourse0001

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,200subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001897599122
TypeChannel
Username@upsccourse0001
Created15 March 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/upsccourse0001

Growth

5,20011 Aug 2026, 12:46 — 5,200 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:44 — 5,200 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:4611 Aug 2026, 15:44
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,195–5,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:445,200no change
11 Aug 2026, 12:465,200first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 15 March 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1945.2%
👍1228.6%
716.7%
👏49.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2023 to 19 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jan 2025, 13:39 UTC≈19,100 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

UPSC Paid Course Available . . DM 👉 @diksha000111

🤔19👍127👏4

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @upsccourse0001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PW UPSC Wallah
@pw_upsc · 183,220
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
OnlyIAS Nothing Else
@onlyiasnothingelse · 210,071
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UPSC Course” (@upsccourse0001), 5,200 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upsccourse0001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.