$BTC at the lower timeframe resistance, a move towards the diagonal followed by a break of the current resistance would make sense. UpOnlyⒸ

Channel
UpOnly© Free Channel
@uponlygroup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001704694773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uponlygroup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 3 January 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uponlygroup |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 12 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 13 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
We decided to publish one of our signals of today for free. Enjoy
direction: long💰 Identification: B1DHEAE🎯 📩#EOS/USDT — 💡 General Tips — position size: 3-5% of your portfolio leverage: 5-15 — 📈 Entry — 2.65 - 2.92 — 🧭 Targets — 2.962 3.018 3.119 3.27 3.497 3.902 4.3 4.803 5.35 — ⛔️ Stop Loss — 2.48 ⚠️ This is not financial advice. UpOnly will not take responsibility for any losses sustained by following this call. ⚠️
$BTC nice bounce of diagonal trendline. While this doesn't rule out a drop below the trendline during the weekend, it is a good sign for upwards momentum to come. UpOnlyⒸ
Dear Members, Due to popular demand, we will be offering a free trial. To start your 3 day free trial message @UpOnlyManager. Along this we will be offering a referral program. For every new customer you refer, you will be rewarded with one free month of UpOnly-Premium. Check our FAQ: https://t.me/uponlygroup/42 UpOnlyⒸ
$BTC first bounce of the diagonal complete. Holding 42.8k or the diagonal would be important if we were to drop back down as to avoid a move sub 40k. Short term we could see price go down but long term price will probably move higher to 47k. UpOnlyⒸ
Our 2. latest #DOGE Signal, posted on 10.01.2022 Reaching peak profit of 67% with 5x leverage. Congratulations for VIP members. 💶
direction: long💰 Identification: B3KVSTH🎯 📩#DOGE/USDT — 💡 General Tips — position size: 3-5% of your portfolio leverage: 5-15 — 📈 Entry — 0.15 - 0.14 — 🧭 Targets — 0.157 0.164 0.177 0.195 0.225 0.25 0.3 — ⛔️ Stop Loss — 0.13 ⚠️ This is not financial advice. UpOnly will not take responsibility for any losses sustained by following this call. ⚠️
$BTC looking pretty good on the daily timeframe. All openings and closes above the major diagonal line. If we flip both Supertrends again it would open the road to 47k again. UpOnlyⒸ
$BTC not looking too good. Sideways action on the same price level isn't a strong bullish signal. Good buyback sub 40k so the support has been firmly established. Taking out the 39640 would be concerning. UpOnlyⒸ
$BTC, too early to tell if we were correct and we just swept 40k and reversed back above major diagonal or if we are going to move horizontally at 40k. As it is right now we were correct but it's still very early. UpOnlyⒸ
$BTC first big move in some time. Currently, the price is in the 42k's, where we were calling for a local bottom. A 42k bottom doesn't seem guaranteed now. We think we are going to move towards the major diagonal trendline, deviating below it and sweeping 40k. Alternatively, the price could bounce off 42k or move sideways at 40k. UpOnlyⒸ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uponlygroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@uponlygroup named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UpOnly© Free Channel” (@uponlygroup), 12 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uponlygroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.