9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1,340. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,766–58,508 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:49
56,967
-233
13 Aug 2026, 03:15
57,200
-153
12 Aug 2026, 06:04
57,353
-116
11 Aug 2026, 09:13
57,469
-192
10 Aug 2026, 12:17
57,661
-196
9 Aug 2026, 09:51
57,857
-184
8 Aug 2026, 06:31
58,041
-167
7 Aug 2026, 09:27
58,208
-99
6 Aug 2026, 18:31
58,307
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.75%
avg views ÷ 56,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,270
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
75 (4 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
245,536
Reactions total
14,301
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
15m 24s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,301 reactions across 75 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5359315377983628864
9,702
67.8%
custom 5359773646699142932
4,599
32.2%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 75 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @updatesmusicxd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌟 «Я выпью, чтоб парни не брили брови» — Voskresenskii, в своём новом альбоме
Женя в своём новом альбоме 🎶, видимо, делает тонкую отсылку на очень давний тренд от фанатов VIPERR 🌟, в тот период, когда все сбривали свои брови.
Видимо ему, так сказать «тренд», не очень сильно понравился...
🙂 — женёк выдал факт, правда так уже никто не делает...
🙂 — ну сбрили и сбрили, щас 100% жалеют
🌟 подписаться
🙂 неделя бесплатн
🙂 А что может Кай этот трек сегодня на площадки дропнет?
🙂 — надеюсь дропнет
🙂 — он даже в альбом теперь не войдет...
🌟 подписаться
🙂 неделя бесплатного впн
🙂 VSRAP выпуск подкаст с группой CUPSIZE уже завтра!
Этой новостью поделился сам VSRAP в своём Telegram-канале. 🌟
➖ Будете смотреть?
🙂 — буду смотреть этот выпуск
🙂 — кому они интересны...
🌟 подписаться
🙂 неделя бесплатного впн
🙂 Lil Flash$ продает товары на Playerоk?
В сети появился скриншот, где на платформе по покупке/продажи цифровых товаров есть карточка продавца с никнеймом «lil flash» 🌟, помимо имени, на каждой карточке присутствует лицо артиста и выполнена в стиле его альбомов. 🙂 На карточке можно увидеть, что продаются валюты популярный игр, таких как Standoff 2 и Fortnite 🎶
🙂 — прогревает товарами перед дилеммой
🙂 — а купить аль…
🌟 Pepel Nahudi встретился с Dave Blunts!
Вчера Пепел выложил в свой закрытый Telegram-канал совместную фотографию с Dave Blunts, где пепел играет ему на гитаре 🎶, а уже вскоре показал их совместный сниппет трека. 🌟
🙂 — них*я себе встреча
🙂 — это эй ай
🌟 подписаться
🙂 неделя бесплатного впн
🙂 JDFLAG один из любимых исполнителей Егорика
Сегодня вышел новый выпуск шоу «ВПИСКА», где гостем стал Егорик 🌟. В этом выпуске он назвал ТОП-3 своих самых любимых исполнителя. Среди них он назвал Земфиру, JDFLAG и 9mice 🙂
🙂 — jdflag
🙂 — литвин такую хуйню слушать не будет
🌟 подписаться
🙂 неделя бесплатного впн
🙂 Полный выпуск новостей, где жена WormGanger'a выкинула их ребенка с окна
Камера наблюдения запечатлела момент падения девочки из окна многоэтажного дома. Как сообщает НТВ, перед случившимся между Анной и её дочерью произошёл конфликт. Женщина открыла окно и не отреагировала на просьбы ребёнка остановиться. 🌟
Очевидцы сразу вызвали скорую и поспешили на помощь. Одним из первых рядом с девочкой оказался сотрудник м…
🙂 Жена Wormganger'a выкинула свою дочь из окна
В сети появилось видео, где задержанную женщину обвиняют в том, что она выкинула свою дочь из окна. 27-летняя жительница Сергиева-Посада страдала тяжелой депрессией, после того как рэпера посадили у нее начались нервные срывы.
По словам бабушки, малышка сейчас находится в реанимации, но врачи отмечают положительную динамику.
➖ Больше информации в комментариях
🙂 — Здо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @updatesmusicxd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@updatesmusicxd edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🙂 В какой части FIFA, в качестве саундтрека был использован трек 2hollis'a
FIFA 2310%
FIFA 2424%
FIFA 2533%
FIFA 2633%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,033 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Updates Music & News” (@updatesmusicxd), 56,967 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/updatesmusicxd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
