1 Apr 2022, 16:23 UTCviews —
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 30 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Channel
updates
@updates_2021
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001396662746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @updates_2021 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 20 February 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/updates_2021 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 1 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 37
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 117
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC48 viewsread 15 August 2026
Did you get it or should I send you 1ust lol
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC47 viewsread 15 August 2026
I expected a bit more too. But generally it's okay It's time will come with upcoming developments
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC47 viewsread 15 August 2026
yeah, it's quite a nice swap, liquidity and volume currently is third of quickswap
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC46 viewsread 15 August 2026
Comparing 6 months development to other smart contract mainnets, it is lagging behind.
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC46 viewsread 15 August 2026
the real estate investment company I use to gather real estate tokens for passive income are migrating to xDAI, so I am very confident, that xDAI is a serious thing with a lot of adoption incoming
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC37 viewsread 15 August 2026
aah, honeyswap is their own swap; nice
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC33 viewsread 15 August 2026
yeah, KSI is shilling it today
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC30 viewsread 15 August 2026
Yeah it only went from 250 in August to 2000 now about 6 months later... Almost 10x....so disappointing hehehe
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC29 viewsread 15 August 2026
How you guys feel about Badger?
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC32 viewsread 15 August 2026
it would be, if any of them showed some proper adoption. STAKE is one of the oldschool L2 solutions and some people anticipate it will be used with uniswap v3 (like lots of references on github or something). they also have their own swap of course (who doesn't these days) - honeyswap
20 Feb 2021, 18:21 UTC29 viewsread 15 August 2026
I have most of my stuff in fiat, mostly because it's not on a bank son can't buy crypto with it 😅
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @updates_2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“updates” (@updates_2021), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/updates_2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.