Решил поделиться первым уроком своего курса "Говори и богатей". Буду рад обратной связи. Какие инсайты и мысли почерпнули.
🔥2❤1🥰1

Channel
@unrealdudnik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001819813684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unrealdudnik |
| Description | В этот канал пишет Миша. Про коммуникации, манипуляции и харизму. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unrealdudnik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 33 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 33 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 8 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 41.9% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 24.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2024 to 22 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Решил поделиться первым уроком своего курса "Говори и богатей". Буду рад обратной связи. Какие инсайты и мысли почерпнули.
🔥2❤1🥰1
Размышления на сон грядущий.
❤2😁2🔥1🤣1
Обратили внимание? Люба пишет, спасибо Михаилу за то, что провел квиз без микрофона. Такое в моей практике ведущего было во второй раз. Первый раз, в далеком 2018 году я вёл открытие ресторана. И там выбило пробки. Система не вытягивала аппаратуру. И я провел все без микрофона. Вот это фото тому подтверждение. К чему я это? К тому, что нужно быть готовым ко всему. И если что-то не получается, надо все равно делать.…
👍3🔥2👏1
Ой ну как было…💔 Хочу поблагодарить всех, кто был с нами вчера, за ваши отзывы и отметки, за вовлеченность и отличное времяпрепровождение ✨ ✨Отдельное спасибо Михаилу за организацию квиза, и проведение его без микрофона 🥲🙂↕️ ✨Рилсмейкеру Вике за контент и терпение нас во время съемки 🤣 ✨Екатерине за интерактив, который всех сплотил ✨И, конечно, Ане за прекрасные кадры, которые вот вот получим 😍 Объявляем рубрику…
❤3🥰1
Вот как это было, в кратком репортаже 😊❤️👌
❤3🔥2🤩1
Сегодня я в малине😁 Вокруг меня 38 чудесных девушек. И я такой весь мужчина… Сегодня веду нетворкинг квиз для @amorvibee Очень крутое сообщество. Рекомендую. Но мужчинам вход воспрещен. Кроме меня 😂
❤5🔥3😁1
Сегодня сформулировал для себя одну классную мысль: «Надо относится к тренингам и мастер-классам как к походам к массажисту: недолго, приятно и легкие корректировки. Конечно, если слушать рекомендации, потом сделать МРТ позвоночника, потом всю жизнь тренировать и растягивать спину, и вообще поменять стиль жизни, то спина реально станет здоровой... Но после массажа все рекомендации забываются»…
❤1👍1
Миша пишет про коммуникации… pinned «Привет! Меня зовут Михаил и я алкоголик. Шучу. Никакой я не Михаил. 😅 я мастер коммуникаций любого уровня. А если вкратце написать обо мне, то это выглядит так: ▫️ Психолог, практик боевого и гуманистического НЛП. Выпускник МГУ, факультет «Психология»,…»
Я вот что сейчас понял. Всю свою жизнь я максимально выписываю себя из зоны комфорта. Как будто даже, я её и не имею больше. Просто растоптал и выкинул. И продолжаю это делать. А у вас есть зона комфорта?
❤1👏1🔥1
А хобби у меня жечь танцпол
❤2🤩1
А еще моя любимая тема - манипуляции...
⚡3❤1
Немного о харизме. Как Вам мысль?
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @unrealdudnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как настроение?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2024 to 22 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Миша пишет про коммуникации…” (@unrealdudnik), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unrealdudnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.