Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Название потом придумаю

@unknownamechannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001834717144
TypeChannel
Username@unknownamechannel
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/unknownamechannel

Growth

407 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:1540no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:3040first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
233
Videos
3
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥342.9%
custom 5318773107207447403228.6%
custom 5256047523620995497114.3%
custom 5294418800098155601114.3%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2024 to 30 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Apr 2024, 21:32 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Хочу дополнить этот пост, так как очень дохуя вышло новых таких игр, рефок, и прочей дрочни. Щас могу выделить одну рефку(https://t.me/Microdiving_bot?start=914800787) , где по заявлениям разрабов сыпят по 50их монет, которые по курсу 3.8$. У кого есть ферма - обязательно прогнать нужно.

🔥1

23 Apr 2024, 13:57 UTC108 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Про вот это гемище тоже не забываю, каждый день выполняю задания. На основе уже 2900 монет, на других по 1000-1600. Щас уже почти везде там жёлтый стандартный пояс. Я кста уяснил что за каждый новый пояс дают по 50 монет сверху. Тоесть если в первых белых поясах давали по 50 монет, то щас мне уже сыпет по 150. Жду просадки по монете лютой, так как чето меня не особо привлекает перспектива покупать монету по такому

23 Apr 2024, 13:50 UTC86 viewsread 10 August 2026

В планах бекнуть ферму, половина которой у меня отлетела по собственной тупости и дальше дрочить ебучие телеграм дропчики по типу пепе.

23 Apr 2024, 13:48 UTC84 viewsread 10 August 2026

В течении недели листинг ноткоина кста, думаю уже все знают. Половину солью на листинге, половину оставлю. На часть, которую солью планирую откупить ещё больше монет ниже, так как пересиживать весь дамп и откуп у школяров — желания нет. Просто сам солью половину и откуплю потом у них же на сайз по-больше. В целом около 104 лямов, которые конвертнули в тыщи. Кста, даже эти игровые тыщи потом конвертнут на бирже в моне

23 Apr 2024, 13:45 UTC54 viewsread 10 August 2026

ЕЕЕЕ-БААААТЬ. Наконец-то кусок дерьма дал заклеймить мне ОАТ. Ебанаты фармят бабки миллионами, а человеческий хост сделать не могут. ОАТ типа в качестве того, что ты прошел квиз, где раздют парслы на верифнутые акки ОКХ. +- по 50 бачей на акк будут давать. Резы а течении двух недель.

19 Apr 2024, 13:12 UTC81 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Внёс на байбите сюда свободные тезеры, чтобы не пылились. Хай буде

18 Apr 2024, 18:09 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ещё одна дрочилка, щас пошла мета делать копии мемов на тоне, типо слерф, пепе, вот сейчас боме. Bome Вообще не ебу чё за проект, в основном там все одинаково, часть выделена на дроп, часть на маркетинг и прочую ересь. Прогоню ферму, а там посмотрим чё выйдет

🔥2custom 52560475236209954971

18 Apr 2024, 14:02 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

УРОООООООО, пришли шекели мои. Они сделали берн монет, которые должны были давать за твиттер, поэтому я придержу пока, цена и так в очке.

18 Apr 2024, 11:28 UTC80 viewsread 10 August 2026

Собираю базу говно-кликалок, дропов, аидропов-рефок и прочего, что может серьезно насыпать, как недавно это сделали PEPE на тоне по просьбе ребят. Сам делаю эти проекты, загоняя туда свою тг-ферму, так как папищиков пока не особо много 1) SPUDI ( их канал ) - Новый мем-токен, 10% выделено на дроп. Это иностранцы при бабле. Хотят залететь в Open League. У них все для этого есть. Кратко про токен: — Эмиссия 1 000 00

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @unknownamechannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Название потом придумаю” (@unknownamechannel), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unknownamechannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.