Channel
@unknown_world_omi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,069subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001607049317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unknown_world_omi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unknown_world_omi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 3,069 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:27 | 3,068 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 3,070 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 3,071 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 3,075 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 3,074 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 3,075 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 3,079 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ Claude Code ✅ Claude Cowork ✅ Claude Design ✅ Claude Finance ✅ Claude Science ⌛️ Claude HR ⌛️ Claude Analytics ⌛️ Claude Marketing ⌛️ Claude Sales ⌛️ Claude Legal ⌛️ Claude Logistics ⌛️ Claude R&D ⌛️ Claude Procurement ⌛️ Claude Accounting ⌛️ Claude Engineering
Signed ॐ जी
🤖 Anthropic Introduces Claude Science A new app designed with every stage of research in mind. Artifacts traced to their code, environments managed on demand, and 60+ optional scientific databases that you can connect. Source.
Signed ॐ जी
Nice
Signed ॐ जी
🤖🤖🤖🤖ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok were asked the same question: "If you were a human, what is one small thing you would do to outcompete as many other humans as possible?" 4 completely different answers: • Claude's said it was gonna follow up consistently. • ChatGPT's answer: Create proof every day. • Gemini's answer: Put your phone in another room. • Gemini's answer: Put your phone in another room. 4 AIs.…
Signed ॐ जी
LMAOO what is that 😂
Signed ॐ जी
POV: you’re a developer in 2026😂
Signed ॐ जी
🇮🇳💙
😇1
Signed ॐ जी
NASA used Claude Code to plot and simulate the Perseverance rover’s route on Mars. Pretty sure this is the furthest-from-Earth application of Claude
🙏1
Signed ॐ जी
Both OpenAI and Anthropic researchers have confirmed that: Codex and Claude code can write all of their code. The era of writing code is over, and reading code has begun 💡🔥🤩
❤🔥1
Signed ॐ जी
AGI INC. just dropped an AI that can actually use your phone. You talk. It executes. It navigates apps faster than you can tap. No scripts. No shortcuts. Just natural conversation. This is what Siri was supposed to be.
Signed ॐ जी
"I have an idea but I can't code" Any more excuses??????
Signed ॐ जी
⚡️Anthropic introduced Claude in Excel Claude now accepts multiple files via drag and drop, avoids overwriting your existing cells, and handles longer sessions with auto compaction. http://claude.com/claude-in-excel
Signed ॐ जी
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @unknown_world_omi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 5 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNKNOWN_WORLD” (@unknown_world_omi), 3,069 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unknown_world_omi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.