Channel
@unisonbp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003581002085 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unisonbp |
| Description | Союзы флуда Bright path |
| Created | 9 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unisonbp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 11 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 11 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (9 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 172 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Семейные союзы Яэ Мико 1. 𝐅𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐃 Инфо: @info_of_the_dead Лайф: @life_of_the_dead5 Следящий: @toxicclown5 Мы им сестра, они нам брат ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 2..🌸˚₊‧𝐅𝕷𝕺𝗪𝗘𝗥𝕭𝖀𝗗‧₊˚🌷 Инфо: @FLOWERBUDinfo Лайф: @FLOWERBUDLIFE Следящий: @unionsMB_bot Мы им жена, они нам муж ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 3. 𝓛𝒆𝒘𝒅𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔. Инфо: @L3WDN3SS Лайф: @L3WDN3SS_L1F3 Следящий: @weeklyiap Мы им Хошина Аи, они нам Хошина Руби ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 4. ﾐ 𝖢𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂…
Дружеские союзы 4 Яэ Мико 76.˙◌ 𝓝𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 ׄ ◇ ۫ 𝓶𝗈𝗈n ⠘ : ⌗𝙉𝙈 Инфо:@nightmoonllh Лайф: @lifechanellnight Следящий:@FG7ML ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 77.𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐏𝐄 𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐌 Инфо:@CarpeDiemINFO Лайф:@CarpeDiemLifeFlood Следящий:@VILIO038 ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 78.°•.>𝑴𝒐𝒐𝒏 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒔<.•° Инфо:@MoonStars_Infooo Лайф:@MoonStars_Life Следящий:@Miss_joke_1 ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 79.ㅤ ﹫ 𝓦𝗘𝗜𝓝︩︪𝗘𝗡 𝗧ꪮ`𝗧𝗘𝗡. ᛝ Инфо:@Info_WT Лайф:@WT_Life Следящий:@bailer_maik ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 8…
👏1
Дружеские союзы 3 Яэ Мико 51.𝘿𝙚𝙩𝙙𝙤𝙢 𝙎𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙤𝙗𝙪 #𝘿𝙎 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙤𝙙 [⚔] Инфо:https://t.me/+KeOSj482aLJmODQy Лайф:https://t.me/DS_life_channel Следящий:@wexsav_ii ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 52. ✿ ˚₊‧ 𝖥𝗅𝗈𝗐𝖾𝗋 𝖥𝗅𝗈𝗈𝖽 ‧₊˚ ✿ Инфо:@FWR_INFO Лайф:@FWR_LIFE Следящий:@meow_sk1i ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 53.𝓚𝓸𝔃𝔂 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓭 Инфо:@Uta_flood0 Лайф:@kanae_life_love Следящий:@Deli4very ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 54.⺀𝗚𝖠𐌑𝖫𝗘 .. Инфо:@GM_1NF0 Лайф:@GM_L1F3 Следящий:@N1CXH ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 55…
💘1
Дружеские союзы 2 Яэ Мико 32.𝐒𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐀'𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐙𝐘 𝐇𝐀𝐓 Инфо:@SCH_kik Лайф:@SCH_life_kik Следящий:@Tart_Sn ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 33.𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐄 Инфо:@INF_MRT Лайф:@LIFE_MRT Следящий: @weluuam_bot ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 34. 𓁿 𝑃𝐻𝐴𝑁𝑇𝑂𝑀 𝐶𝑂𝐿𝐷 「 Инфо: @coldfloodingo Лайф: @colddlife Следящий: @dendghhi ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 35.𝐀𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧'𝐬 𝐂𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 Инфо:@infoacp Лайф:@lifeacp Следящий: Бачера ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 36.𝐒𝐈𝐋𝐊𝐄𝐍 𝐓𝐖𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 Инфо:@info_STw Лайф:@li…
❤1
Список дружеских союзов ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 1.• 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗻 Инфо:@The_GLD_INF Лайф:@GLD_LifeChannel Владелец:@lee_assa ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 2.𝐖⃦ܼܻܻ֕𝐄𝐈𝐋ࣹᰮ𝐋ܸܿ𝐄𝐑֑ Инфо: @WLLinfo Лайф: @WLLL1FE Владелец:@xh1esr ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 3.𝙆𝙀𝙍𝒮𝒜𝐾𝐼 𝘒𝘕𝘐𝔉𝔈 𝚅𝙸𝙻𝙻𝙰𝙶𝙴 Инфо: @KKV_INF Лайф: @KKV_LIF Владелец:@nsifla ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ 4.𝐹𝐿𝒪𝒪𝒟 𝒪𝒩: 𝒟𝐸𝑀𝒪𝒩-𝒮𝐿𝒜𝒱𝐸𝑅 𝐵𝐿𝒜𝒟𝐸𝒮 Инфо: @TomiokaUta_ShinobuINFO Лайф:@TomiokaUta_ShinobuLIFE Владелец:@adinwix ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ …
❤2
Союз всегда поможет в беде и радости. И никогда поздно его создать. ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ Владелец: @Anon_chat_Yae_Miko_bot Флуд:‹~𝔅𝔯𝔦𝔤𝔥𝔱 𝔓𝔞𝔱𝔥~› ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ Условия Яэ Мико дружеские союзы: 80/100 союзов Яэ Мико семейные союзы: 4/20 #союзы 1. Дружеские Союзы Яэ Мико 2. Дружеские союзы 2 Яэ Мико 3. Дружеские союзы 3 Яэ Мико 4. Дружеские союзы 4 Яэ Мико 5. Семейные союзы Яэ Мико ︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @unisonbp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 330,616 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@unisonbp named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Unions BP” (@unisonbp), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unisonbp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.