канал:: @DYNASTY_CRAWFORD след:: @Sa44fe папка:: рп пдп:: от 3:3 до 9:9 допы:: @u_mort @tendermurder @zzerd1. @uu_mort @Viiincyyy @d31Th666

Channel
союзы хами
@unionhami
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002466499357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unionhami |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unionhami |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 3 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
здравствуйте,давайте заключим союз? правила канал: @ESTELLEROVSKIE бот - @fatarsha_bot ( по желанию) пдп: 7:7 след: @OnlyFatarsha допы: 2:2 @SOFYA_BLINA 3:3 @dominic_tvar 4:4@a_1idCh 5:5 @D1QULI 6:6 @nonnakiimm 7:7 @myusi1y папка: рп
🤡1
канал: @CHANSKIO след: @fbdksk_dff Допы @meih4a @videdck @l1rfa @mrldff
след @tten1am 2:2 @XAXAXAXAXxxC 3:3 фэлор 4:4 фейт 5:5 @krisss_00 6:6 @SYIDOKBDP 7:7 @karykkne 8:8 @sykisosati 9:9 @jhdiodkx папка рп канал @BAK3NAWA пост с вас
🤡1
здравствуйте! конечно не против.) канал: @Stars_Brothel следящий: @Ari_Veles подписка: 8:8 папка: рп/актив, рп+актив допы: 1:1 - @Daemmerhafte 2:2- @Ari_Veles 3:3 - @kkkkiitttyyyy 4:4 - @Schlampeen 5:5 - @Miksa_li 6:6 - @klwrx1s 7:7 - @SON4SHECHK0 8:8 - @AMER1I
🤡1
здравствуйте милейший. пришел к вам за заключением союза. подписка 5:5 папки: рп. актив. актив + рп. след: @SK5BOY доп 2:2 @arsffg доп 3:3 @link0hka доп 4:4 @DARKS0ULE доп 5:5 @VoxSacra канал: @endless_lovesr правила: https://t.me/jxjjwob/3 пост от нас / с обеих сторон.
🤡1
салам,заключим союз? кн: @HELIN_FML 5х5 след: @mill_n1 папка рп пост с нас допы: 2×2 @qwerty_ni1 3×3 @lil_m1soo 4×4 @s1too_min 5×5 @gv3rdd
🤡1
Здравствуйте, давайте союз, @spicyysx 5.5 Папка рп След https://t.me/m/1LaRszcxNzky Допы @si1Lv3 @xDggel @MiraBlessedd @smrblssd
🤡1
Канал: @GNARRLYS @zerfer1 @vinsulka @fuzlewd @Linux_le @YASURUU ( следящий) 5:5 рп.
🤡1
Канал : @illusion_demonized Допы: @hhskch @frikiy @KOKS104 @mrasskl Следящий — @MRAS11KL Рп 5;5
🤡1
Хелло. Хотим предложить вам союз! канал : @Viscontikl допы : @miaa19 @shhhib @Iam_Zer_0 след : @R0Tt3R_d4m папка рп/вз будем рады сотрудничеству
🤡1
канал: @ORLANDOFML след: @kissdvs папка: вз пдп: 5:5 допы: 2:2 @Bu2Get 3:3 @YO1NS7 4:4 @VA7LIN 5:5 @sxwma
🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @unionhami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 356,539 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@B1ADD · 5,1271 postBAKUNAWA 🔒
@BAK3NAWA · 1,2501 post𝘾𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙊𝙑𝙎𝙆𝙔
@CHANSKIO · 5,4301 postESTELLEROVSKIE🤡
@ESTELLEROVSKIE · 1,3331 postGNARLY'S FAMILY.
@GNARRLYS · 3631 postРест до 26.08 𝐈𝐋͢𝐋̷͢𝐔̸֬𝐒ׁ֮𝐈𝐎̷̚𝐍 ͌͟𝐃̤𝐄𝐌𝐎̋𝐍̒𝐈̷𝐙̸𝐄̷𝐃̴
@illusion_demonized · 2,8271 post𝗟𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘.
@jxjjwob · 51 postОтморозки
@Karasun10 · 531 post️️️️ ️️️️ ️️️️ ️️️️
@klwrx1s · 41 post𝓚𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽𝔂𝓾𝓼𝓱𝓪💋
@krisss_00 · 451 postнетленные
@netlenns · 9131 postCLOSED P1KMYX1
@P1KMYX1 · 1871 postпереходник
@ReallyAntichrist · 31 post44Safe
@SA44FE · 1401 postпереходник сонечки
@SON4SHECHK0 · 21 post𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗟 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦
@soulovskiee · 4,4611 post🌇ᏢᎬᏒᎰᏫᏒᎷᎪNᏟᎬ ᏫᎰ ᏚᏆNᏚˢ.ᵖ.ᵍ
@spektaklgrehov · 2,4111 post𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧
@Stars_Brothel · 3321 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@unionhami named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“союзы хами” (@unionhami), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unionhami.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.