🚨Hello, fam! Our top priority with this Telegram channel is that you are readily informed of all the news, contests, and updates we will be announcing soon. For this reason, we have decided to unify all the content in our Discord community. So that you can not only read the info but also tell us what you think, meet new people, etc. 👉 Can’t wait to see you in our community! https://discord.gg/QfwH3YHkmV P.S. The …

Channel
UNION AVATARS
@unionavatars
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001703047178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unionavatars |
| Description | Digital identities through avatars: a passport to the metaverse. Start your adventure! 🚀 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 16 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unionavatars |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 37 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 39
- Videos
- 27
- Links
- 88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 32s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 44.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2023 to 2 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
👋 Hello fam, today we bring great news: We launch a new Open Call, Became a Creator, for digital designers organized by Another-1, together with The Immersive Kind 🚀 📆 Deadlines: from April 11 to May 14 🏆 The incredible prizes: 🔹1st = $1,000 + NTR1-Meta NFT 🔹2nd = $500 + NTR1-Meta NFT 🔹3rd = $500 + NTR1-Meta NFT 🔹4th & 5th = NTR1-Meta NFT 👉 Do you want to participate? Check out the link below to find out more a…
❤1
Hello, fam! Wanna roar as loud as a dragon? 🐲 Then you will need the new outfit from Union Avatars & Dragon Corp, the specialized NFT guide. 👉 Enjoy this new design in our avatar maker with the code DRAGONCORP and tell us your next adventure: https://lnkd.in/dJwgrxdD
🔥1
Hello, team! 👋 ❓Did you know that the first avatar was created in 1960? Since then, there has been an enormous evolution, coming to create hyper-realistic avatars or those that can communicate. 👉 Interesting, right? Would you like to know more about this evolution? https://unionavatars.com/avatars/the-evolution-of-avatars-a-journey-to-human-likeness/
🤔1
🎮 GM Meta Gamers🎮 Have you ever wished for a trustworthy digital identity across all your favorite games? Well, your wish is about to come true! Ailand and Union Avatars have partnered to bring blockchain-based digital identity solutions to the gaming world. ⚔ Get ready to level up your gaming experience! https://youtu.be/gw83hhiAmBQ 👉 More info: https://unionavatars.com/union-news/ailand-and-union-avatars-transf…
🔥1
Hello, team! In the Metaverse, we seek to break the limits of the real world and get infinite representation. We desire inclusiveness. Amara is the perfect example: an independent, optimistic, and communicative woman, always willing to discover the Metaverse possibilities. 👉Fill out this brief form with your opinion on digital identity: https://forms.gle/Cgr7Gs1Z2ejt5pei7
👉Choose who you want to be 👈 Metaverse is full of options. You can be who you want and express yourself as much as you desire. However, there are still limitations to being ourselves. This lack of variety, representation, or inclusiveness affects more women's users. We have interviewed diverse experts in the Metaverse and digital fashion to know their opinions about what users need to feel represented: https://yout…
❤1
Hello, team! We are ready to change the Metaverse and build an inclusive space 🚀 We look for a realistic and inclusive digital identy. But many female users live discrimination with unrealistic and hypersexualized avatars. 👉 Union Avatars have decided to be part of the change with Amara, a non-sexualized woman with a normalized body and out of stereotypes. 🔜 Tomorrow the change begins; join it too!
👏1
Say hello to Union Avatars Unity SDK 0.062! 🥳 This ground-breaking tool will allow you to add expressive and engaging characters to your virtual worlds. 👉 Learn more about the new possibilities and join the adventure! https://discord.gg/PNkVXChmdW
👏1
🔥Union Avatars & Another-1🔥 Step by step, together, we are building new opportunities to represent ourselves in the Metaverse. 👚 Fashion helps us be ourselves, and that's why it's so exciting to announce this collaboration with Another-1, the latest luxury fashion web3 platform where users can create and collect Metaverse-ready digital fashion. Do you want to know how to take advantage of this opportunity? 👉 Chec…
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
🌟 Last day of the MWC 🌟 We have reached the end of this great event, and we wanted to thank the thousands of people who have lived the Feel the technology experience with us. It has been an exciting few days, where we have met many of you and discovered new projects and initiatives. We even had some royal surprises! 😉 👑 We will continue to bring new news and opportunities to build incredible immersive experiences …
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @unionavatars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 462,871 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNION AVATARS” (@unionavatars), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unionavatars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.