Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В хитросплетінні літер

Channel

В хитросплетінні літер

@undertheletters

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,615subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002016824603
TypeChannel
Username@undertheletters
Description🍊🌨️ Тут життя читачки азійської літератури, якихось задротських книг (як зі списку Намджуна) і будь-яких історій. Амбасадорка Муракамі і книжок англійською. Трошки душню, проводжу клуби і вчу розуміти азійські твори Реклама/співпраця: @Koshikaaa
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/undertheletters

Growth

2,61514 Sept 2026, 12:47 — 2,615 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 13:22 — 2,615 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 12:4714 Sept 2026, 13:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,612–2,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 13:222,615no change
14 Sept 2026, 12:472,615first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 2,615 subscribers
Avg views / post
579
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held17 (8 September 202613 September 2026)
Views total9,268
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,900
Videos
121
Links
258

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23092.4%
🍓93.61%
👍52.01%
🔥20.803%
🥰20.803%
🤔10.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC246 views5 reactionsread 14 September 2026

залітайте на етер!! https://www.tiktok.com/@undertheletters?_r=1&_t=ZS-99cHtL5ijBP

5

13 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC354 views12 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Гайз, сьогодні робимо ввечері другий раунд етеру з румбоксом і розмовою про Азію, книжки, кпоп і все інше? 👀

9🥰2🍓1

12 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC463 views32 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Провести вечір після пар (так, я вчуся у суботу 🥸) за аніме і румбоксом>>> Згадався цікавий факт про Міядзакі — першим його аніме (ще до студії Ґіблі) мала стати екранізація «Пеппі довгапанчоха», він навіть літав у Швецію аби зустрітися з Астрід Ліндгрен, але вона йому відмовила цікаво як би Пеппі виглядала у його виконанні, бо для мене особисто вона дуже яскрава і така, яку було б круто і важко передати на екрані

28🍓3🔥1

12 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC457 views21 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Forwarded from @ruslanabooksloverrr

на сайті самого видавництва зараз за 200 можна взяти, там знижка -20%

21

12 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC485 views24 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Кохання у великому місті вже можна придбати в електронному форматі і прочитати!! 250грн, до речі дуже норм ціна як на мене https://epub.com.ua/product/kokhannia-u-velykomu-misti/

19👍5

11 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC552 views31 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Дякую, пінтерест, якраз мем ранку буде 👀 До речі, чому Муракамі пише жахливих жінок і секс-сцени та чому він не мізогін знімала відео на ютуб

30🤔1

10 Sept 2026, 14:55 UTC591 views23 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Хіхі, перший в житті етер в тік тоці провела - поговорила про азійські книжки, кпоп і життя)) тож вайб був файний, треба ще таке проводити 👀

22🍓1

10 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC558 views11 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Що ж, пробуємо в тестовому режимі перший етер в Тік ток - буду клеїти румбокс і говорити про Азію та книжки 🫀 тож можете задавати будь-які питання https://www.tiktok.com/@undertheletters?_r=1&_t=ZS-99cHtL5ijBP

11

10 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC683 views42 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Ааааа нарешті в жовтні вийде ця неймовірна книжка 💔💔 гейська, і да, над нею я ревіла Мій відгук Анотація: Йонг, цинічний, але веселий корейський студент, тусується з найкращою подругою Джехі, ходить на побачення з Tinder і топить тривоги в барах за соджу й сигаретами. Коли Джехі влаштовує власне життя, Йонг залишається сам доглядати за хворою матір’ю й шукає близькості у стосунках із чоловіками, серед яких намагаєт

39🍓3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @undertheletters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

Що скажете?

  1. Цікаво, прийду70%
  2. Мє, не треба35%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 13 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЛітЕра (НМТ мова + літ.) 🌾
@literazno · 25,832
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
НМТ 2027 by ZNOHUB
@nmt_znohub · 23,061
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В хитросплетінні літер” (@undertheletters), 2,615 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/undertheletters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.