Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π™π™£π™™π™šπ™§π™œπ™§π™€π™ͺ𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙖𝙑𝙠

Channel

π™π™£π™™π™šπ™§π™œπ™§π™€π™ͺ𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙖𝙑𝙠

@undergroundtalk

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

1,369subscribers

-412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003929179620
TypeChannel
Username@undergroundtalk
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 28 June 2026 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/undergroundtalk

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3691,7811,5757 August 2026 β€” 1,781 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,781 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 1,778 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 1,754 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 1,733 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 1,707 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,692 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 1,657 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 1,633 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 1,603 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 1,585 subscribers7 September 2026 β€” 1,552 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 1,515 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 1,477 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 1,453 subscribers29 September 2026 β€” 1,396 subscribers6 October 2026 β€” 1,369 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 60 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,307–1,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 16:201,369-27
29 Sept 2026, 09:391,396-57
19 Sept 2026, 14:391,453-24
15 Sept 2026, 11:391,477-38
11 Sept 2026, 12:571,515-37
7 Sept 2026, 03:581,552-33
2 Sept 2026, 11:531,585-18
30 Aug 2026, 17:161,603-30
27 Aug 2026, 22:041,633-24
24 Aug 2026, 19:141,657-35
20 Aug 2026, 23:541,692-15
18 Aug 2026, 06:131,707-26
14 Aug 2026, 21:071,733-21
11 Aug 2026, 06:161,754-24
8 Aug 2026, 01:021,778-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:491,781no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:271,781first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯2845.2%
😁2235.5%
😭1219.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 03:37 UTC208 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ BREAKING: Initial reports claimed that LayerZero Executor wallets had been compromised, with over $2.4M allegedly moved across multiple blockchains and consolidated on Ethereum, where the assets were converted into 956 ETH and $322K USDC. UPDATE: LayerZero has clarified that these transfers were part of routine operational rebalancing. There was no security breach, and user funds were never at risk. πŸ’¬ @Undergrou…

😁5πŸ”₯1

9 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC333 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️JUST IN: A HashKey user lost ~$3M in a social engineering scam. The victim received a call from a fake support team and was social engineered, resulting in the theft of 30 BTC (~$1.84M) and 702 ETH (~$1.2M). πŸ’¬ @Undergroundtalk

πŸ”₯5😁2

6 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC421 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN:A crypto user has lost over $2 million after interacting with a phishing website disguised as a legitimate token swap service. The victim attempted to swap approximately $2M in crypto but received only $14K in return, with the remaining funds stolen by the malicious platform. This incident serves as another reminder to always verify URLs and use only trusted, official swap interfaces before approving any…

πŸ”₯3😁3

3 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC455 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ BREAKING: Hinkal Protocol has suffered an exploit resulting in the theft of approximately $820,000 USDC. The attacker reportedly abused a vulnerability in the protocol's prooflessDeposit() function, combined with multiple transaction calls, to drain funds from the platform. The stolen assets are now being moved through Tornado Cash and THORChain in an apparent attempt to obscure their trail. πŸ’¬ @Undergroundtalk

πŸ”₯3😁2

1 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC473 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ JUST IN : A 19-year-old alleged Scattered Spider member, Peter Stokes, has been extradited from Finland to the United States, where he now faces charges including conspiracy, computer intrusion, and wire fraud. U.S. prosecutors allege he played a role in the May 2025 cyberattack targeting a luxury jewelry retailer. The group reportedly demanded an $8 million ransom, but the company refused to pay. If convicted, …

πŸ”₯3😁1

30 Jun 2026, 07:25 UTC524 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ BREAKING: Polymarket has confirmed a security incident after a third-party vendor was compromised, allowing attackers to inject malicious code into parts of its website. The attack reportedly resulted in around $3 million in stolen crypto from 11+ users, who unknowingly approved fraudulent wallet transactions. Polymarket has since contained the breach, removed the malicious code, and stated that all affected use…

πŸ”₯4😁3😭2

29 Jun 2026, 08:57 UTC596 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️BREAKING: The AIDC token on BNB Chain has suffered an exploit resulting in losses of around 220.12 WBNB (~$120.9K). Instead of burning tokens from the seller's wallet during transactions, the contract mistakenly burned tokens from the liquidity pool, disrupting the token-to-WBNB balance. The attacker exploited this imbalance to manipulate the pool's reserves and withdraw approximately 220 WBNB, leaving the liquid…

πŸ”₯5😁2😭2

28 Jun 2026, 21:46 UTC731 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️JUST IN: A crypto holder has reportedly lost approximately 6,400 ETH (around $10 million) after falling victim to a sophisticated social engineering attack. Convincing the victim to hand over access to a wallet containing more than $10M in assets. The stolen ETH is now being distributed across three separate wallets, a tactic often used to divide and move illicit funds more efficiently while complicating tracking…

😭8πŸ”₯4😁4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @undergroundtalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ™π™£π™™π™šπ™§π™œπ™§π™€π™ͺ𝙣𝙙 𝙏𝙖𝙑𝙠” (@undergroundtalk), 1,369 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/undergroundtalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.