Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,735–1,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 06:39
1,749
+11
18 Sept 2026, 08:00
1,738
-5
13 Sept 2026, 20:00
1,743
-3
10 Sept 2026, 05:36
1,746
-2
4 Sept 2026, 16:16
1,748
+2
1 Sept 2026, 12:53
1,746
-2
29 Aug 2026, 09:58
1,748
+4
26 Aug 2026, 04:33
1,744
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:27
1,745
+3
19 Aug 2026, 11:09
1,742
-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:17
1,743
+6
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
1,737
-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:33
1,741
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:49
1,741
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
58m 15s
Average length
7m 17s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35
68.6%
❤
5
9.80%
🔥
4
7.84%
🤮
3
5.88%
👏
2
3.92%
🤔
2
3.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Teil 1: https://youtu.be/P9S_Fl1Fj6k
Teil 2: https://youtu.be/1z8ZZOafSzU
𝐈𝐜𝐡 𝐟𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞 𝐤𝐮𝐫𝐳 𝐳𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧: Das Video ist jetzt also auch mutmaßlich? War der „Anschlag“ eventuell schon „mutmaßlich“?
✅ 𝟏 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐫, 𝟐𝟗 𝐕𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐳𝐭𝐞 ✅ Lasst mich raten: 𝗩𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼𝘀 𝗸𝗼𝗻𝗻𝘁𝗲 𝗸𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝟭𝟬𝟬.𝟬𝟬𝟬 +𝘅 𝗧𝗲𝗶𝗹𝗻𝗲𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗻, weil Handyverbot war? Oder wurden diese nach dem „Anschlag“ direkt von den pflichtbewussten Sicherheitskräften einkassiert?
✅ ES …
𝑺𝑰𝑬 𝑺𝑻𝑬𝑪𝑲𝑬𝑵 𝑨𝑳𝑳𝑬 𝑼𝑵𝑻𝑬𝑹 𝑬𝑰𝑵𝑬𝑹 𝑫𝑬𝑪𝑲𝑬!!!
𝐼𝑐ℎ 𝑤𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒, 90% 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑖𝑐ℎ ü𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝐴𝑢𝑠𝑚𝑎ß 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐾𝑙ü𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑖𝑛 𝐺ä𝑛𝑧𝑒 𝑛𝑖𝑐ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑒𝑤𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑡!
➤ Gern geschehen.
🚨⚠️ 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐮𝐞𝐫𝐭! Häääää? Denkfabriken?
Was soll das sein? Eine endgültige Rangfolge der einflussreichsten Denkfabriken sind leider nicht zu eroieren. Für "globalen" Einfluss auf Außen-, Sicherheits- und Wirtschaftspolitik gehören die genannten zur Spitzengruppe:…
‼️ Demnächst! -Kanal bekommt einen neuen "Anstrich"- Umbenennung in SchwurbelBOX | ZeitZeuge 21.7.26
https://youtube.com/shorts/2kRX0bf_Vfs?feature=share
Bei YouTube gibts ab sofort nein neues „Klingelschild“ 🛎️@schwurbeolbox-zeitzeuge zu finden. UnbequemeWahrheit
Ich übersetze das kurz:
„Verfassungsgericht sieht Propaganda als unverzichtbar für UnsereDemokratie™️.“
„Im Namen des Volkes.“ natürlich.
⚖️§ "𝑰𝒎 𝑵𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒌𝒆𝒔" - ISCH 🤞🏼SCHWÖRE!!! - Oder vielleicht doch nicht? - 17.07.2026
Teil I
https://youtu.be/HGMCsr0OVis
Teil II
⚖️§ "𝑰𝒎 𝑵𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒌𝒆𝒔" - TEIL 2 - 𝙎𝙄𝙀 𝙎𝙏𝙀𝘾𝙆𝙀𝙉 𝘼𝙇𝙇𝙀 𝙐𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙍 𝙀𝙄𝙉𝙀𝙍 𝘿𝙀𝘾𝙆𝙀 - 18.07.2026
https://youtu.be/_I6lfxiAE3Y
#propaganda #gez #gezwang #s
Schönen guten Morgen ihr treuen Seelen…
Ich war mit dem Video zu voreilig, 4 Wochen zu früh. 🤣🤦🏻♂️
Jetzt heißt es abwarten. 😎
Kommt gut in den Tag.
☀️ ☕️
❤3👍2
Signed Ja_G 🕳🐇
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @unbequemeWahrheit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@unbequemeWahrheit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@schwurbeolbox named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UnbeQueme Wahrheit- ZEITZEUGE 2Q2Q” (@unbequemeWahrheit), 1,749 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unbequemeWahrheit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.