Channel
@umidaliiev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
742subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002056874868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @umidaliiev |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/umidaliiev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 742 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 725 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 725 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (10 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,678 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
86 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 46 | 53.5% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 17.4% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 12.8% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 9.30% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В2В да қуруқ просмотр эмас, аниқ харидор муҳим. Фақат пули бор мижозни топиб, қолганини автоматик чиқариб ташлайдиган система мана шу PDF да кўрсатилган. Юклаб олила, Ёқимли иштаха!. @TOP1_foiz | @umidaliiev
🔥4
Сиз қайси тарафдасиз? Эртага сизи AI мас, айнан AI ни ишлатадиган бошқа маркетолог ишсиз қолдиради. Кўпчилик ҳалигача битта текст ёки креатив учун соатлаб вақтини сарфлавоти. Ўзини устида ишламаган мутахассисларни 80% қисми келаси 2 йил ичида бозордан аниқ чиқиб кетади. Ҳозир ChatGPT ёки Midjourney ни билиш оддий холга айланиб уже керак бўлмай қолди. Мижозга сизи неча соат меҳнат қилганийз қизиқмас, тезкор натиж…
💯3
Пул керак...! Шу иккита сўз одамнинг миясига чуқур ўрнашиб қолса, секин-аста унинг қалби қорая бошлайди. Бошида ҳаммаси яхши ниятда бошланади: оиламни боқаман, қарзимдан қутуламан, яхшироқ шароит қиламан... Лекин вақт ўтиб, бу фикр аста-секин одамни ўзига қарам қилиб қўяди. Кўздаги нур йўқолиб, атрофдаги ҳамма нарсага ва одамларга фақат маблағ, фойда ёки зарар призмасидан қарашни бошлайди. Энг қўрқинчлиси шуки,…
👍7
Одисей киносига тушдим! Очиғи Режиссёр Нолон филмлари доим топ даража бўлган шубхасиз! Бу филми хам топ даражада бўлибди. 3 соат га яқин вақт қанақа ўтиб кетганини сезми қолдим! Компазитор ва овоз эффектлари мани назаримда Оскор олса керак! Сабаби но одатий ва воқейликга жуда мос тушган!. ____ Лекин...! Битта нарса манга жуда ғалати кўринди. Дунёдаги хозирги сиёсат тарихий бўлган мифалогияни хам воқейликни хам…
👍3😁1
Ҳамма нарсадан нолийверадиганлар… Ҳаво иссиқ бўлса — муаммо, совуқ бўлсаям — муаммо. Клиент йўқ — ёмон, кўпайиб кетса — чарчаб кетдим. Аслида, нолиш бу масъулиятдан қочишни энг осон йўли. Бизни диққатимизни ва энергиямизни ўғирлайдиган энг катта душман ҳам шу ўзи. Ҳаммаси оддий: фокусимиз қаерда бўлса, натижа ҳам ўша ерда бўлади. Муаммони устида дийдиё қиб ўтиргандан кўра, битта бўлсаям ечим топишга ҳаракат қиб…
👍7
⚠️ Жавобини топинг? Эрта меҳнатга киришиб ҳам афсусланамиз, ўқиб олиб кейин меҳнатга киришсак ҳам афсусланамиз. Эрта оила қуриб ҳам афсусланамиз, кеч оила қурсак ҳам афсусланамиз. Ўзимизга мақул соҳани танлаб ҳам афсусланамиз, Яхши шароити бор соҳани танласак ҳам афсусланамиз. Чет давлатга кўчиб кетиб ҳам афсусланамиз, ўзимизда қолсак ҳам афсусланамиз. Хооош! Деярли барча қарорларимиздан афсусланамиз вақт ўтиб.…
👍9❤4
✅ TOP1% нинг янги мавсуми 2026 йилнинг биринчи ярми ортда қолди. Шу вақт ичида TOP1% подкасти лойиҳаси шунчаки интервьюлар майдони эмас, балки бозордаги энг кучли мутахассислар ва тадбиркорларнинг йеғилиш базаларидан бирига айланди. Келинг, очиқ рақамларда гаплашамиз: Бизни кўраётганларнинг асосий қисми реал бизнес эгалари, ТОП менежерлар ва ўз соҳасининг лидерлари. Ҳар бир эпизод тармоқларда мақсадли томошабинга…
Ёпиқ эшиклар... Бир йигит йирик компанияга оддий мобилограф бўлиб ишга жойлашмоқчи бўлди. Уни суҳбатга чақиришди. — Сиз фақат видео оласизми ёки маркетингни, савдо олиб келишни ҳам тушунасизми? — сўрашди ундан. — Йўқ, мен фақат чиройли кадрлар оламан, бошқасига қизиқмайман, — жавоб берди у. — Узр, унда биз сизни ишга ололмаймиз. Бизга фақат видео эмас, савдо керак, — деб кузатиб қўйишди. Тирикчилик. У ўз устида …
👍8💯1
Стандартлар! Бир марта ҳақиқий зўр кофе ичсангиз, кейин оддийсини ичолмай қоласиз. Бир марта мард ва сўзида турадиган инсон билан ишласангиз, майдакашлар билан умуман гаплашгингиз келмайди. Бир марта ҳақиқий мутахассисга иш топшириб кўрсангиз, чала усталарга яқинлашмай қўясиз. Инсон табиати шунақа — яхши нарсага жуда тез ўрганади. Бир марта юқори даражани ҳис қилгандан кейин, паст стандартларга қайтишни умуман х…
👍5❤3💯3🔥2
Об хаво янгиликлари! (Маркетинг) Ушбу видеода: - 187 та бўш иш ўринлари - Айрим Ёш соха мутахассислар хатоси - Талаблар ва умумий хулосалар! P/S: Чек ёқори нишага кириш ниятидамисиз? Бу хақида кичик видео тайёрладик 👉 📺@Media_arxitektor_bot @TOP1_foiz | @umidaliiev
💯4❤3👍2
⚠️ Огох бўлинг! Хар 10 та одамдан 8 таси маркетолог! Аммо 10 та дан 2 та соф мутахассисхам топиш қийин. Шуни эвазига бозорда но тўғри тушунча ривожланган. "Кўпроқ пул топиш учун, кўпроқ мижоз олиш керак!" 🤔 Очиғи Аввал ман хам шундай ўйлардим! Лекин!!! Йўқ. Сизга кўп мижоз эмас, Тўғри Ёндашув керак экан! ___ Ижрочи ёндашуви - $1000 агар омадиз келса $2000 Бренд архитектор - $3000+ ... Брендформанс Архитектори…
🔥2
$1500 га сотиш қийинми? 2-опросник тахлили! Нега бизнес эгаси 300 долларлик жиянини танлайди? Хооош очиғини этаман. Бозорда пул тиқилиб ётибди. Тадбиркор ўзининг бизнеси учун миллионлаб пулларни рекламага, арендага ёки ремонтга иккиланмай сарфлайди. Лекин нега айнан сизга келганда қиммат дейди? Чунки тўғри жавоб — "В" варианти. Сиз унга Инвестиция ва Фойда эмас, оддий Ортиқча харажат сотмоқчи бўлдингиз. Би…
😁3⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @umidaliiev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 36,167 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Umid Aliev” (@umidaliiev), 742 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umidaliiev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.