Channel
@umenggg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,173subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001779333715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @umenggg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/umenggg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 1,173 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,173 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 January 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😘 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这里不仅是一个信息分享平台，更是一个探索世界的窗口 吃瓜色色 搭子商铺 货多多号铺 萝莉ai脱衣机器人 吃瓜ღ猎奇【抖音吃瓜】 AI星空脱衣换脸机器人 星耀【海外担保】业务大厅 法律危机公关核心业务频道 东南亚新闻华人吃瓜猎奇大曝光 海外社交账户数据筛选平台 混剪小屋🫦 抖音风裸舞抖音曝光 经典国漫动漫🔞同人动漫之家 🌎 柬埔寨华人社区 · 大事件频道 💬东南亚华人社区出海交流群 中文反差萝莉母狗探花偷拍吃瓜🔞 星耀出海 优质供需 海外项目资源 资源搜索 🔍中文搜索 超级索引 全能搜片 全球新闻头条/吃瓜/全网曝光 投稿骗子曝光频道
🤖 U盟管理机器人｜全开放群管工具 一键接入，轻松管理你的TG群组 🚀 支持 N+群同时管理，无需复杂配置： 👉 拉入群设置管理员权限 → 输入 /settings → 即可使用 🔥 功能覆盖： 反垃圾｜验证入群｜关键词回复｜违禁词｜夜间模式｜权限管理｜自动删除｜多语言 等 一个机器人，搞定所有群管理问题。 U盟技术支持 U盟管理机器人： @umchbot
在出海圈，海华出海一直是行业的重要风向标，拥有良好的信誉与流量基础，为很多出海人指明了方向。 而 U盟 正在走一条 更快速、更长期的流量整合之路。 长江后浪推前浪，前浪为我们铺路，我们为后来者乘凉。 U盟正在慢慢种下一棵属于自己的 流量之树，不断汇聚资源、连接合作，让更多出海伙伴在这里找到机会。 终有一天，这棵树会 枝繁叶茂，而所有 U盟成员，都将在这片树荫下 共享资源、合作共赢。 感谢海华让我们乘凉 ： @pzbg112
U盟宗旨 U盟不参与成员之间的任何生意与交易，只专注打造一个 安全、可靠、开放的出海流量池。 我们希望为广大出海伙伴提供一个 资源交流、合作对接、信息共享 的平台，让有资源的人找到合作，让有需求的人找到渠道。 在这里 连接资源、促进合作、实现共赢，共同打造一个健康、长期发展的出海生态圈。 【供需限时开放】 如需发布供需请联系： @Umengaa 供需频道：@umenggx
📢 U盟供需发布说明 由于 U盟团队承接了部分「涉外经济」社区的原有流量资源，为回馈新老用户的支持，现阶段 供需信息发布全部免费开放。 📌 用户可在群内免费发布供需信息。 ⚠️ 重要提示： 群内所有供需信息均为 第三方用户发布，发布内容的真实性与交易安全 需用户自行甄别与核实。 任何交易行为均为用户之间自愿达成，与 U盟平台无直接关系。 建议交易前 充分验证对方信息，注意风险防范。 感谢大家对 U盟社区 的支持。 如需发布供需请联系： @Umengaa 供需频道：@umenggx
📢 公告通知 由于 涉外经济 项目经营调整， 本群组及频道现由 U盟团队正式买断接手运营。 后续将继续 正常经营、持续引流、资源对接， 原有群组与频道也会在此基础上 全面升级发展。 ✨ 2026 新的一年 · 新团队 · 新开始 祝各位老板： 💰 U进U出 · 财源滚滚 🚀 项目爆单 · 流量暴涨 📈 合作共赢 · 生意长虹 也希望大家在新的一年： 多赚U、多合作、多发财！ 任何需求请联系 U盟-盟主：@Umengaa
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «U盟【出海公告】»
@IP_Proxy 在 【领取】Google Ads谷歌广告高手超详细教程 中发帖 《Google Ads谷歌广告高手 – 搜索广告，带你从入门到精通谷歌搜索广告》 【资料内容】这门课程深入讲解谷歌搜索广告，从入门到精通。内容涵盖广告类型、排名规则、关键词策...
@seoToProfit 在 推特账号购买资源合集 中发帖 推特账号购买资源合集
❤1
@seoToProfit 在 推特账号引流实战复盘：两种方案的优劣与组合打法 中发帖 刚好在群里跟一个铁子聊到 推特账号 + 引流 这块，趁着有点时间，系统整理一下我目前看到、也亲自接触过的 两种主流玩法，给大家做个参考。 先附上聊天记录截图（老群友都懂，我有...
鲁班七号 (@LUBAN250) 在 【LUBAN 鲁班】专业背景调查与信息查询 🔍 中发帖 🔊业务总览： 在信息不对称的时代，看清事实是风险控制的第一步。我们提供全维度的数字足迹核验，个人及关联信息调查等综合业务，协助您在商务合作、人才录用及个人事务中还原最真...
😘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @umenggg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 637,635 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“U盟【出海公告】” (@umenggg), 1,173 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umenggg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.