Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 63 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411–430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Oct 2026, 00:02
415
+1
29 Sept 2026, 12:16
414
+1
16 Sept 2026, 00:37
413
-2
9 Sept 2026, 00:59
415
-5
29 Aug 2026, 17:56
420
-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:56
422
-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:56
423
-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:19
428
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:13
428
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
210 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😍
65
31.0%
❤
49
23.3%
❤🔥
34
16.2%
💋
25
11.9%
custom 5451867117144005586
10
4.76%
💔
10
4.76%
custom 5357401566326320174
6
2.86%
custom 5411176365053467085
6
2.86%
💘
5
2.38%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ulyana_slubovyu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 4 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩 да это же яя! неужели про тгк вспомнила..
не выходила к вам на связь чуть больше месяца, а ощущение, что прожила без вас полгодика уж точно
сколько событий, поездок, эмоций было прожито 💔 небольшую часть воспоминаний оставлю тут, не буду сильно спамить вам тут
поездки в Питер, Челябинск
закрытие четвертого учебного семестра
возвращение к йоге, практикам, 🤩 научилась балансу в бакасане (!!)
а еще я погрузилась в…
вчера ученица спросила, как я не выгораю с таким большим объемом задач, выгляжу бодренькой и энергичной девчулей 😄
а у меня такой многозадачный образ жизни с детства, мама меня по максимуму загружала кружками и активностями + школа, где я всегда училась на 5 — это создало мощную базу для формирования моей личности и шила в одном месте )
в последнее время правда немного стала уставать, в такие моменты важно вовремя …
🌦️ за окном дождик, словила осенний вайб и спустилась за сырниками и капучино в кофейню
изменяю себе и в кои-то веки не готовлю завтрак дома
еще и книжку прихватила, не читала несколько месяцев точно, пора возвращать этот ритуал, хотя бы парочку страниц, чтобы давать мозгу пищу для размышлений не только из рилсов и выпусков на YT
дочитываю когда-то начатую книгу «Атомные привычки», к удивлению много интересных мыс…
будни 🤍 сняла небольшой вложик
каждый день куча дел, встреч, событий - порой забываю, какой сегодня день недели и что было вчера
одним словом, жизнь! благодарна за каждый момент, за прекрасное окружение, за дело, которым я горю и занимаюсь изо дня в день 🥹
Катя кстати айпад уже успела купить 😹 начали работать мы с ней в марте ))
сегодня анализировали конкурентов салона красоты из Екатеринбурга (это её новый клиент), столько крутой информации извлекли из ресерчинга, теперь идей для контента море + уже есть видение, в каком направлении двигаться в работе с этим проектом
🤩 следующие этапы — разработка визуальной концепции проекта, упаковка страниц в социальных сетях и п…
❤8❤🔥5😍5💋2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ulyana_slubovyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С любовью 💌” (@ulyana_slubovyu), 415 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulyana_slubovyu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
