Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ulugbek Writes

@ulugbekwrites

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,092subscribers

+127 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004499687315
TypeChannel
Username@ulugbekwrites
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ulugbekwrites

Growth

1,9652,0922,028.57 August 2026 — 1,965 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,975 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,092 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,946–2,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:182,092+117
8 Aug 2026, 05:201,975+10
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,965first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.6%
avg views ÷ 2,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total24,753
Reactions total361
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15542.9%
14139.1%
👍328.86%
102.77%
❤‍🔥61.66%
🥰51.39%
🏆41.11%
💘30.831%
😇30.831%
💯10.277%
😎10.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC863 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

5 seats left. Registration closes in 3 days. A sample essay correction👈 📥 @ulugbeksadmin

3👍3

6 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,360 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

EXAM STORY, WRITING 9.0 At the outset of 2024, I came dangerously close to an overall Band 9.0, with 9.0s in Listening and Reading, an 8.5 in Writing, and an 8.0 in Speaking. Funnily enough, I had scored 9.0 in Speaking just before this sitting – you can't have it all. 😒 But the highlight of this exam was my first 8.5 in Writing. It was such a flex at the age of 18. I didn't see it coming, to be honest, especially

24👍12🔥11

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,370 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I just remembered that I've scored 9.0 in Writing Task 2 twice. 😅 🙋‍♂️ Would you like me to share a POV from both exams first, and then a long read about how I did it? Comment "I want answers" 👇

🔥5312👍7❤‍🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC≈1,410 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Read the full course prospectus in this file

🔥13

4 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC≈1,390 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📝 WRITING CORRECTIONS COURSE Most students don’t improve because they don’t write enough. And when they do write, they often receive nothing more than a band score and a few generic comments. This course is different. For 20 consecutive days, you’ll complete one IELTS Writing task every day, and I’ll personally correct every single essay. You’ll receive detailed feedback, a freshly written Band 8.5+ sample answer

63

4 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC≈1,210 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧 JUNCTION #MapVocabulary meaning: a place or point where two or more things meet, cross, or join, such as roads and railway lines. 🇺🇸 INTERSECTION is an American alternative, and it is a more specific word that only refers to a place where two or more roads meet, not railway lines or anything else. 👉 ... and a post office at the junction of School Road and London Road. There are also different types of junction

7

3 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈1,250 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Fill in the blank ✍️ The following sentence comes from a model answer as part of my book The Maps. Beyond the triangle, the village had a school and a church along School Road, and a post office at the ______ of School Road and London Road. #MapVocabularyChallenge

👍7

3 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC≈1,400 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This is the channel I'm talking about. Same channel where this sample answer comes from.

🔥7

2 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,280 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Those who bought my Task 1 Maps book are asking for more I couldn't be happier, honestly! Your support and trust in my work means the world to me. ❤️ 👨‍💻I already started working on new reference books, and they will be available by the end of August. Until then, I have something else to share with you – a private channel with around 60 sample answers (and notes) for Task 1. Comment 'IN' if you want details. 👇

157🔥3👍2

2 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,490 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

41 Recent Task 2 Questions 📁 ✅ June exam questions ✅ Organized by topic ✅ How to study this bank The most recurring question type is "agree/disagree", while the most common topic is "education". This only means one thing – prepare really well for these. @ulugbekspeaks

16🏆2🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,490 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧 ENGULF #MapVocabulary meaning: (of a natural force) sweep over (something) so as to surround or cover it completely: 👉 The cafe was engulfed in flames. 👉... a second flow passed to the east of the castle and engulfed the port completely Order my new writing book for more!

🔥18

1 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC≈1,440 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

What one verb expresses this idea best – lava, the product of a natural disaster, completely covers an area? 👇 #MapVocabularyChallenge

🔥203👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ulugbekwrites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,620 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ulugbek Writes” (@ulugbekwrites), 2,092 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulugbekwrites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.