Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 57 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 540–575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 23:14
544
-6
18 Sept 2026, 22:40
550
+1
10 Sept 2026, 03:01
549
-8
30 Aug 2026, 23:52
557
-4
23 Aug 2026, 22:19
561
-3
15 Aug 2026, 19:55
564
-6
8 Aug 2026, 03:32
570
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:47
570
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:11
571
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 17 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
28
17.3%
❤
23
14.2%
custom 5307622818056260338
22
13.6%
🔥
14
8.64%
💯
13
8.02%
🤬
10
6.17%
custom 5339438406776680645
7
4.32%
custom 5377493504941379663
6
3.70%
👌
6
3.70%
custom 5398053968653869164
4
2.47%
😢
4
2.47%
custom 5188472999266782772
3
1.85%
custom 5348222031508823295
3
1.85%
🤷
3
1.85%
custom 5251738284148675824
2
1.23%
🏆
2
1.23%
🤔
2
1.23%
🥰
2
1.23%
custom 5431785349011494471
1
0.617%
⚡
1
0.617%
6 further kinds
6
3.70%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ПО МАТЧУ
Ну что завершилось первое дерби сезона. Этот матч не очень важный, потому что матчи группового этапа не очень важны, а лишь просмотр ротации. Но победе все равно очень рад
Игдисамова сделал состав, как я и хотел резервный с двумя стержнями: Кис, Глебов! А остальные либо игроки недавно восстановившиеся от травмы и не набравшие максимальные игровые кондиции или играли запаса.
Но тем не менее сыграли хорошо …
1)Сначала хотел кратко рассказать о истории с Жуаном. И да бразилец не перейдёт в ЦСКА, трансфер сорвался уже 100%. СМИ пишут 2 причины: не хватило денег, не нужен был Игдисамову. Брейдо написал : Однако, взвесив совокупность игровых и финансовых характеристик, в ПФК ЦСКА было принято общее решение выйти из переговоров.
Что Игдисамов не очень хотел видеть в команду бразильца, эта и правда и не правда. Он считает, чт…
🔴🔵Боевой и очень интересный состав ЦСКА на игру с Локо !
Бориско дебютирует, Лукин и Абдулкадыров в защите, Гайич восстановился, Рейс, Фиров, Алвес в старте. Состав полу резервный, но очень интересный!!
ПО МАТЧУ
Ну что, к сожалению мы не смогли обыграть Крылья Советов. Ничья в таком матче плохой результат, но справедливо говоря самарцы играют хорошо. И теперь можно понять ничью динамиков
Они контролировали игру в первой и последний четверти.
После того, как сравняли счёт засушили игру. Но все равно ничья неприемлемый результат.
Я не согласен с теми-кто говорит, что игра была ужасная. Создавали мы моменты хорошо. И…
🚨ЖУАН МОЖЕТ СОРВАТЬСЯ
🌐Трансфер бразильца может сорваться. Турецкий клуб нарушил устное обещание. Была договоренность о 15 млн €, а сейчас они просят 20. ЦСКА скорее всего выйдет из переговоров.
При этом из-за него отказались от Даку, который забил в первых двух туров и перешел в спартак. Интересно кто запасной кандидат, надеюсь не те о ком писал Мяч Ру.
Рады срыву?
👌🏻-да, лучше найдём
🤬-нет, Жуан идеальный вариа
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ultrascska12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️Ультрас ЦСКА💙” (@ultrascska12), 544 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ultrascska12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.