Channel
@ulmasbek_kontent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003145330899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ulmasbek_kontent |
| Created | 19 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ulmasbek_kontent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 82 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 84 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 84 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (19 October 2025 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 175 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 33.3% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 9.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Har kuni post joylash kanalni o'stirmaydi Ko'pchilik Telegram kanalini rivojlantirish uchun bitta narsa kifoya deb o'ylaydi: "Har kuni post joylash". Go'yoki bir oy davomida tanaffussiz kontent chiqarsa, obunachilar ko'payadi, ishonch ortadi va mijozlar o'zi keladi. Ammo amalda bunday bo'lmaydi. Chunki kanalni postlar soni emas, ularning vazifasi o'stiradi. Bir narsaga e'tibor bering. Nega ayrim kanallarda haf…
👍2
Shu kunlarda nimalar bilan bandman Kanalda post chiqmaganiga ham 15 kun bo‘libdi. Bu vaqt ichida esa bekor yurganim yo‘q. Aksincha, sahna ortida bir nechta yo‘nalishda ishlashda davom etdim. Birinchidan, shaxsiy kutubxonamni tartibga soldim. Kitoblarim ro‘yxatini tuzib chiqdim va ularning soni 50 tadan oshganini bildim. Asosan marketing, kopirayting, sotuv, mijozlar bilan ishlash va shaxsiy rivojlanishga oid kito…
🤩2
Nega 90% Telegram kanallar sotmaydi Ko‘pchilik Telegram kanal ochadi. Kontent chiqaradi, auditoriya yig‘adi, ba’zida postlar yaxshi ko‘riladi yana ulashiladi ham. Lekin baribir natija o‘zgarmaydi: mijoz yo‘q, murojaat yo‘q, sotuv yo‘q. Bir muddat oldin men ham shuni kuzatdim. Muammo kontent sonida emas ekan. Muammo - kontent ortida tizim yo‘qligida. Eng ko‘p uchraydigan 3 sababni aytaman. Birinchisi funnel yo‘q…
🔥4
Ba’zi e’tiroflar puldan ham qimmat bo‘ladi Ayniqsa, u sizni birinchilardan bo‘lib o‘qitgan ustozlaringizdan kelsa. 2022-yil boshlarida kopiraytingni o‘rganish maqsadida Nurbek Yo‘ldoshevning kursiga yozilgan edim. O‘sha paytda maqsadim oddiy edi: shunchaki yaxshi matn yozishni o‘rganish. Lekin kurs davomida tushundimki, kopirayting faqat matn yozish emas. Bu auditoriyani tushunish, fikrni aniq yetkazish va ishonc…
🎉3
Ko‘pchilik post yozadi lekin obunachiga emas Shuning uchun ham ko‘plab postlar yoziladi, lekin o‘qilmaydi. Ko‘pchilik kontent yaratishda bitta xatoga yo‘l qo‘yadi: Ular auditoriya nimani bilishi kerakligini emas, o‘zlari nimani aytish kerakligini o‘ylaydi. Natijada postlar: — foydali bo‘lib ko‘rinadi — uzoq yoziladi — mehnat bilan tayyorlanadi Ammo kutilgan natijani bermaydi. Sababi esa oddiy. Muallif o‘ziga …
👍4
Eng yoqimli reklama - mijoz yoki hamkasbning samimiy fikri Bu safar men haqimda aytilgan bir necha iliq so‘zlarni siz bilan ham bo‘lishgim keldi.
Ko‘pchilik kontent qilaman deydi Lekin juda kam odam qilayotgan ishlarini muntazam ko‘rsatadi. Shu sabab ko‘p mutaxassislar: — ishlaydi — natija qiladi — lekin deyarli ko‘rinmaydi Natijada esa ulardan kuchsizroq mutaxassislar ko‘proq mijoz oladi. Sababi oddiy: Bugun faqat yaxshi ishlashning o‘zi yetmaydi. Odamlar siz nima qilayotganingizni ham bilishi kerak. Shu kunlarda ushbu Telegram kanalga post joylay olmadi…
🔥1
Bir inson bilan tasodifiy tanishuv ba'zan yaxshi hamkorlikka aylanishi mumkin ekan Bir necha kun oldin Telegram orqali O‘lmasbek aka bilan tanishib qoldim. Dastlab oddiy suhbat sifatida boshlangan muloqot davomida uning kopirayting, kontent marketing va Telegram blog yuritish bo‘yicha bilimlari e'tiborimni tortdi. Oradan ko‘p o‘tmay, uni loyihalarimizga kopirayter sifatida taklif qildim. Hozirda u jamoamizga Teleg…
LinkedIn'ga qo'yilgan postlarim oxirgi 28 kunda 770 marotaba ko'rilibdi. - O‘lmasbek Kontent orqali o'sish haqida: @ulmasbek_kontent
Telegramda obunachi narxi nega hammada har xil Kimdadir 500 so‘m. Kimdadir 5 000 so‘m. Ba’zilar esa umuman obunachi yig‘a olmaydi. Muammo reklama narxida emas. Muammo — auditoriya sizni nima uchun kuzatishini tushunmaslikda. Ko‘pchilik Telegram kanallarga reklama beradi va o‘ylaydi: “Pul sarfladim = obunachi keladi.” Aslida esa reklama faqat odam olib kiradi. Obunachi esa kontent sabab qoladi. Shuning uchun b…
Ko‘pchilik Telegram kanallarda reklama beradi Lekin juda kam odam shu reklama orqali haqiqiy mijoz, auditoriya yoki sotuvga erishadi. Shu sabab ko‘p reklama: — ko‘rinadi — lekin ishlamaydi — va tez orada “samara bermadi” degan xulosaga kelinadi Muammo — reklama “nima uchun” va “kim uchun” yozilganini tushunmaslikda. Telegramda reklama berishdan oldin bitta savolga aniq javob bo‘lishi kerak: “Bu reklama kimning …
Ko‘pchilik Telegram kanal ochadi Lekin juda kam odam u orqali mijoz, auditoriya yoki shaxsiy brend qura oladi. Shu sabab ko‘p kanal: — o‘smaydi — mijoz olib kelmaydi — vaqt o‘tib tashlab yuboriladi. Asl muammo kontentda emas. Muammo — kanal nima uchun ochilganini bilmaslikda. Telegram blog ochishdan oldin bitta savolga aniq javob bo‘lishi kerak: “Siz bu kanal orqali nimaga erishmoqchisiz?” Chunki maqsad konten…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ulmasbek_kontent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,212,668 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“O‘lmasbek | Kontent orqali o'sish” (@ulmasbek_kontent), 82 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulmasbek_kontent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.