Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Брук Шилдс

Channel

Брук Шилдс

@uliabrooke

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,494subscribers

+509 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001816806524
TypeChannel
Username@uliabrooke
DescriptionГруппа ВКонтакте русской Брук Шилдс в фильме голубая лагуна 👇👇👇 https://vk.ru/club234598290 Канал где я читаю книги t.me/juliabrooke1991 Телеграм канал где показано лицо русской копии Брук Шилдс https://t.me/RussianJulia Мне написать 👉 @linsykolman
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uliabrooke

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8757,5147,194.57 August 2026 — 6,985 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,985 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,987 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,968 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,950 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,944 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,946 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,932 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,912 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,888 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,875 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,879 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,915 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,937 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,133 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,232 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,356 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,403 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,420 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,430 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,463 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,485 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,514 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,501 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,489 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,494 subscribers7,4947 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +509. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,779–7,610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:517,494+5
6 Nov 2026, 09:177,489-12
3 Nov 2026, 02:117,501-13
30 Oct 2026, 20:307,514+29
28 Oct 2026, 06:277,485+22
25 Oct 2026, 13:107,463+33
22 Oct 2026, 07:287,430+10
18 Oct 2026, 15:167,420+17
15 Oct 2026, 08:407,403+47
12 Oct 2026, 02:417,356+124
5 Oct 2026, 18:567,232+99
28 Sept 2026, 15:427,133+196
18 Sept 2026, 16:176,937+22
14 Sept 2026, 11:186,915+36
11 Sept 2026, 07:206,879+4
6 Sept 2026, 03:196,875-13
1 Sept 2026, 15:486,888-24
29 Aug 2026, 07:426,912-20
26 Aug 2026, 09:246,932-14
23 Aug 2026, 06:076,946first reading

Engagement

194 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.34%
avg views ÷ 7,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
400
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 194 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 109 of 110 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held194 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total43,995
Reactions total1,391
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,340
Videos
≈2,320
Links
≈261

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
39m 10s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,267 reactions across 181 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,75677.5%
🤯1366.00%
❤‍🔥773.40%
🤔622.73%
👏582.56%
😱552.43%
👍492.16%
😍331.46%
💯311.37%
🌚100.441%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 110 posts held from the last 30 days (5.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 21:11 UTC357 views32 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Я так ответила

❤23💯5👍4

11 Nov 2026, 21:09 UTC359 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Без понятия как это работает, но почему-то по ее таблу понятно что конченый человек, при чем я сужу не исходя из того красивый кто-то или нет, а просто на интуитивном уровне ей бы однозначно не стала доверять. К сожалению комментариев в канале нет. Но стало интересно, может вы меня понимаете😭

❤19👏3💯3

11 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC420 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Конечно ,я всегда помогу в распространении

❤14🤯8

11 Nov 2026, 19:39 UTC425 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Юль, привет, сразу предупреждаю, ужасные кадры живодерки. Я присылаю тебе это только потому что видела, что ты часто освещаешь такие проблемы. Если не хочешь смотреть и постить, я пойму. Треш-стример, Галина Новоселова (ник nenormova), пытаясь выглядеть крутой перед своими зрителями, безжалостно раздробила черепушку живому кролику - ударила так, что кости треснули, а сам кролик ещё долго бился в агонии, дёргался и …

😱18🤯6

10 Nov 2026, 23:36 UTC589 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

А на фоне зима ,вьюга Единственное время года ,которое меня впечатляет ( естественно когда зима снежная )

❤15😍3

10 Nov 2026, 23:32 UTC574 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Я с сыном и внуками ,но мистер Кузьма ушел в другое место А мой Шон такой красавец ,у него богатырская внешность и очень величественные глаза ,он похож на русского царя

❤17❤‍🔥5

10 Nov 2026, 03:07 UTC728 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

С днем рождения 🎁🎂🎈🎉

❤10❤‍🔥4👏4🤔4🌚2

10 Nov 2026, 00:12 UTC≈1,130 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Мне нужна такая штучка

❤10🤔8😱5

9 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC763 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Аха представляю какой ужас испытывают люди ,которые натыкаются на меня и которых трясло в свое время рядом со мной

👍8

9 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC756 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍4🤔1

9 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC789 views16 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

На самом деле я настоящая психопатка ,я всегда у людей в реальной жизни вызывала двоякие эмоции и часто не очень приятные ,меня по жизни никогда не любили и я всегда всех триггерила ,еще до всяких соц сетей

❤15🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @uliabrooke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 23:46 UTCAnonymous Poll66 voters

Вы верите ,что эти события будут ?

  1. Верю56%
  2. Не верю44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

А у вас ?

  1. Указательный длиннее безымянного57%
  2. У меня безымянный длиннее указательного43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KANARI_🇰🇷🇰🇿
@kanariyls · 37,345
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Брук Шилдс” (@uliabrooke), 7,494 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uliabrooke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.