Как вы?
😭21🤯13👍6👀2😢2🌚1🎉1👾1

Channel
@ukropchick_ua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,435subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001315786791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ukropchick_ua |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ukropchick_ua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 1,435 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 1,433 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 1,435 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 1,438 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1,441 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 1,445 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 1,450 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 1,446 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 1,446 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,204 |
| Reactions total | 262 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,067 reactions across 14 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 257 | 24.1% | |
| 💯 | 159 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 153 | 14.3% | |
| 🤣 | 142 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 73 | 6.84% | |
| 🥰 | 46 | 4.31% | |
| 💩 | 45 | 4.22% | |
| 🤡 | 37 | 3.47% | |
| 😁 | 30 | 2.81% | |
| 🙏 | 28 | 2.62% | |
| 😭 | 21 | 1.97% | |
| 💊 | 17 | 1.59% | |
| 🤯 | 16 | 1.50% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 0.937% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 0.469% | |
| 🥱 | 5 | 0.469% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.187% | |
| 9 further kinds | 12 | 1.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,067reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как вы?
😭21🤯13👍6👀2😢2🌚1🎉1👾1
Обычно я редко скриню личку, но тут стоит. Коррупция это наш главный бич, с ней нужно бороться, ее нужно пытаться минимизировать, но это мега сложный вопрос, который не делается щелчком пальцев и за год, а в войне и без возможности менять власть, просто нереально, но давить власть можно. Я продолжаю "варить" инструкцию для нас,я хз или она сработает, но я пробую, закончится война, будет возможность, попробую (там и …
👍51❤14🤡7💯5💩3👎1😁1
https://www.youtube.com/live/8PUklBHx_xE?si=03SzVn6sCbLXJX6o
👍21❤13💩5💊2🤡2🤔1
Привет. Завтра, в понедельник, в 21:00 стрим. 😉 *а это котики, их все любят, почти 😺😻
🥰38👍27❤14💩3🔥2🤡2💊1
Нда, ночь была громкой, впервые тут так было, хотя и бываю я не так часто. Может кому подниму настроение, может наоборот, белый амур, примерно 6.5кг. Короче поехал не зря 😁
👍55🔥17🐳10❤3🤡3💩2👾1💊1
Привет. Я "прорвал" ступор по пропогандону, понял как сделать (как обычно, заново, старое почти все улетело). Хочу поехать завтра на природу с ноутом, там часто лучше думается, когда есть готовый и материал и виденье. Полагаю до выходных видос будет на канале, будет полезный и русня будет злой, как всегда, бо поломаю много их частых сказок). *а видео в посте, просто поржать 😉
👍46🔥12💩6🙏3👎2🤡2✍1🍌1
😂 Как по мне, то почти комплимент получился. * "сбу за яйця взяли", это на 99% маркер персоны что хочет чтоб мы сдались и опустили руки, ему открыли граници и он убежал. 1% что это русак
💯52😁10💩5🤡3🥱3🤔1🤯1
🤣
🤣81😁15🤡5💊3💩1🔥1🤯1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥79❤13👍6👻5💊3💩3🤡2😁2
Киевляне держитесь! Да и не только вы. Для силы духа нам всем , война давно стала не в одну сторону. Они ляжут, а мы выстоим. 💛💙
💯52🙏25💩4❤🔥3💊1🤡1🤪1
Доброе утро, добрые дроны и плохие лесные ягоды. Красиво блин и полезно 😁
🔥31🥰8💩3💊2🤡2
Давайте ещё раз попробую максимально кратко объяснить опасность перегрева ожиданий. Завышенное ожидание успеха или скорого решения проблемы усиливает удар по психике в момент наставания точки «Х»: создано много нейронных связей, и в момент нереализации всем им приходится переживать стресс. Это прямой вред мозгу плюс снижение продуктивности. Но ещё важнее другое. Когда крики с одной стороны о том, что «всё будет хор…
💯37❤8👍6💩4🤡2🤝1🤪1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ukropchick_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Укропчик” (@ukropchick_ua), 1,435 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ukropchick_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.