Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DEFENCE

Channel

DEFENCE

@ukrainedefence

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,896subscribers

-558 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002042472264
TypeChannel
Username@ukrainedefence
DescriptionНовини у сфері безпеки і оборони 24/7 Надіслати контент та зворотній звʼязок - @UDefence_bot
Created20 January 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ukrainedefence

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8967,4547,1757 August 2026 — 7,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,448 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,434 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,425 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,415 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,400 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,387 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,372 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,362 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,341 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,321 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,304 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,296 subscribers30 September 2026 — 7,095 subscribers7 October 2026 — 7,042 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,983 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,972 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,961 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,950 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,941 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,936 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,931 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,922 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,910 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,896 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net -558. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,812–7,538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:086,896-14
6 Nov 2026, 03:366,910-12
2 Nov 2026, 18:076,922-9
31 Oct 2026, 04:396,931-5
28 Oct 2026, 10:366,936-5
25 Oct 2026, 04:256,941-9
22 Oct 2026, 14:496,950-11
19 Oct 2026, 00:496,961-11
16 Oct 2026, 07:286,972-11
13 Oct 2026, 11:166,983-59
7 Oct 2026, 08:367,042-53
30 Sept 2026, 22:207,095-201
16 Sept 2026, 02:597,296-8
12 Sept 2026, 19:407,304-17
8 Sept 2026, 21:417,321-20
3 Sept 2026, 17:377,341-21
31 Aug 2026, 04:137,362-10
27 Aug 2026, 23:167,372-15
25 Aug 2026, 01:357,387-13
21 Aug 2026, 06:027,400first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
506
Videos
721
Links
76

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 26s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,441 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,05072.9%
👍1087.49%
🫡1077.43%
🤬654.51%
😁563.89%
😢261.80%
🤯211.46%
🤝50.347%
✍30.208%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,441 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,590 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @exilenova_plusPhoto

Редкино, Тверская область. Сегодня ночью был атакован Редкинский опытный завод. В прошлый раз он был атакован в феврале 2026 года. Предприятие производит компоненты топлива «Децилин-М» для крылатых ракет Х-55 и Х-101, а также присадки к дизельному топливу и авиационному керосину. Завод является частью производственной цепочки ВПК рф, обеспечивая ракетную и авиационную промышленность специальной химической продукцие…

👍14🔥1

9 Oct 2026, 04:56 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

20 Sept 2026, 05:06 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

16 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈5,180 views65 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Безпілотник уразив російський бомбардувальник Су-24М на аеродромі «Саки» в окупованому Криму. За наявною інформацією, дрон спочатку влучив у носову частину літака, а згодом — у паливні баки.

🔥51👍14

6 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC≈8,010 views81 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

06.07.2026 знищено/застосовано: 0/6 балістичних ракет 3М22 0/23 балістичних ракет 9М723 31/33 крилатих ракет Х-101 6/6 крилатих ракет 3М-14 326/351 ударних БпЛА типу Герань В наслідок російського удару по Києву вбито 14 людей, понад 30 постраждалих. Збито 0 балістичних ракет внаслідок відсутності ракет для їх перехоплення. Союзники, дайте або ракети або ліцензію на їх виробництво. Фото: Єфрема Лукацького

🤬65😢16

3 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC≈6,590 views104 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Архівні кадри, зняті росіянами. Гори трупів росіян під час спроби «прориву» на Добропілля у 2025 році.

😁45🔥32👍14🤯13

15 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTC≈6,310 views88 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

В Іркутській області РФ розбився російський стратегічний бомбардувальник Ту-22М3.

🔥75👍11😁2

10 Jun 2026, 08:09 UTC≈5,690 views46 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

«Азов» показав кадри атаки на Маріупольський порт Кількість влучань вражає 🤯

🔥41🫡4👍1

4 Jun 2026, 16:32 UTC≈5,720 views93 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Результат ураження російського корвета «Бойкий» у Кронштадті 3 червня. Повідомляється, що один член екіпажу – 200.

🔥78🫡9👍6

3 Jun 2026, 09:30 UTC≈4,970 views86 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Вражаюче відео! Мадяр повідомив про ураження російського корвета «Бойкий» у Кронштадті. Саме цей корабель у червні 2025 року супроводжував через Ла-Манш санкційні танкери «теневого флоту» Росії, використовуючи фальшивий сигнал ідентифікації (AIS).

🔥70👍9🫡7

18 May 2026, 16:37 UTC≈7,740 views232 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @exilenova_plusVideo

‼️ Ракетний удар по спецбатальйону «Ахмат» ЗС рф, на відео десятки трупів. Попередньо, після прильоту 60×200.

🔥171🫡27👍17😁6🤝5✍3😢3

23 Apr 2026, 12:13 UTC≈7,120 views40 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Інші кадри операції.

🔥39👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ukrainedefence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ProjectLeaflet
@TheLeaflet · 28,466
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
Real News No Bullshit
@RNNBS · 20,460
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 September 2026
The Observers
@contlictobservers · 44,692
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
frontier_conflict
@frontier_conflict1 · 25,175
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
RAGE X - Intelligence | War
@rageintel · 20,026
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 September 2026
Our Wars, Today
@ourwarstoday · 46,062
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DEFENCE” (@ukrainedefence), 6,896 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ukrainedefence.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.