Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
13,800 average views per post against 6,018 subscribers — an engagement rate of 230.0%. Across the 1,036 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,165–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Spanish — the middle half sit between 6.67% and 21.9%, with a median of 12.2%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
25 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
346,060
Mature posts only
237.0% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,978–6,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:45
6,018
+6
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
6,012
+13
6 Aug 2026, 18:40
5,999
+16
6 Aug 2026, 03:31
5,983
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:05
5,983
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
230.0%
avg views ÷ 6,018 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,800
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.024%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
25 (28 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
346,060
Reactions total
69
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 35s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
62
96.9%
👍
1
1.56%
👏
1
1.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔 ¿Tengo las mismas vacaciones con contrato a jornada parcial que a tiempo completo?
✅ En el Estatuto de Trabajadores no hay distinción entre los derechos de una persona trabajadora a tiempo parcial o completa
✅ Para calcular las vacaciones lo que importa es la duración del contrato
📝 Desliza para saber más y compártelo con quien lo necesite.
IG: https://www.instagram.com/p/Db2wU0AFUTG/?img_index=1
X: https://x.c…
🏠 ¿Tienes dudas sobre la fianza del alquiler? En la Oficina de Asesoramiento de Vivienda de UGT las resolvemos.
🔑 Hoy te aclaramos cuándo pueden descontarte dinero de la fianza, cuándo deben devolvértela y qué derechos tienes como inquilino.
📝 Déjanos tus dudas en comentarios o contacta con la Oficina de Asesoramiento de Vivienda de UGT. ¡Estamos para ayudarte!
IG: https://www.instagram.com/p/Db0LVMkDBjY/
X: https…
❌ Cosas que tu jefe no puede hacer: impedirte disfrutar del permiso por lactancia.
👶 El permiso para el cuidado del lactante es un derecho laboral reconocido por la ley. La empresa no puede negarlo ni impedir que lo disfrutes en los términos previstos en el Estatuto de los Trabajadores y, en su caso, en tu convenio colectivo.
❗Si la empresa impide o dificulta su disfrute, podría estar vulnerando tus derechos labora…
🚨 UGT reclama actuar ante las 358 muertes en accidente laboral registradas hasta junio
⚠️ El sindicato insta a los grupos parlamentarios a aprobar la modificación de la Ley de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales para reducir la siniestralidad laboral
🔗Léelo aquí: https://x.com/UGT_Comunica/status/2085651646533517657?s=20
🚩 Frase tóxica del día: "Esto lo hacemos por el equipo."
El compañerismo nunca debería utilizarse para justificar la falta de personal o una sobrecarga de trabajo.
🤝 Colaborar forma parte de cualquier equipo. Asumir de manera habitual el trabajo que corresponde a la empresa organizar, no.
📌 ¿Te han dicho esto alguna vez? Cuéntanos tu experiencia en comentarios y comparte este vídeo
IG: https://www.instagram.com/p…
🚫UGT reclama a la Unión Europea una prohibición vinculante de las prácticas de conversión
🏳️🌈El Área Confederal LGTBI de UGT considera insuficiente que la Comisión Europea plantee únicamente una recomendación y exige una normativa obligatoria que proteja los derechos LGTBI en todos los Estados miembros
🔗Léelo aquí: https://x.com/UGT_Comunica/status/2084913802286408113?s=20
‼️UGT subraya que los datos de julio acreditan la necesidad y el acierto del proceso de regularización de personas extranjeras y confirman la fortaleza del mercado de trabajo
📈 El empleo supera por primera vez los 22,5 millones de personas ocupadas y el paro registrado, pese al repunte puntual del mes, se mantiene en su nivel más bajo en un mes de julio desde 2007.
🔗 Léelo aquí: https://x.com/UGT_Comunica/status/20…
🔴 UGT alerta de que la siniestralidad laboral no se detiene pese al periodo vacacional
El sindicato denuncia que, aunque comienza agosto y muchas personas están de vacaciones, las muertes en el trabajo continúan produciéndose sin que nadie ponga remedio.
🔗 Léelo aquí: https://x.com/UGT_Comunica/status/2084258467703840974?s=20
🏖️ Haz esto si quieres disfrutar tranquilo/a de tus vacaciones este verano:
✅ Pide tus descansos por escrito, ya sea por email o Whatsapp
✅ Siempre con suficiente antelación
📝 Conoce tus derechos y si tienes dudas, contacta con UGT.
IG: https://www.instagram.com/p/Dbkuk0tgHx6/
X: https://x.com/UGT_Comunica/status/2084218357662814571?s=20
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ugt_comunica/video/7669743603144559894
🥵 Golpe de calor: los síntomas que nunca deberías ignorar en el trabajo.
Cada verano, las altas temperaturas ponen en riesgo la salud de miles de personas trabajadoras. Reconocer un golpe de calor a tiempo y saber cómo actuar puede marcar la diferencia.
💧 La prevención empieza antes de que aparezcan los primeros síntomas: hidratación, descansos, adaptación de tareas y medidas frente al calor no son una recomendació…
🫂 UGT traslada su solidaridad a la Confederación Sindical Japonesa tras el devastador terremoto y reclama una respuesta internacional frente a la crisis climática
🌍 El sindicato defiende la solidaridad sindical internacional como la clave frente a una emergencia climática cada vez más destructiva
🔗Léelo aquí: https://x.com/UGT_Comunica/status/2083190185462776302?s=20
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ugt_es. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 237,555 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UGT Comunicación” (@ugt_es), 6,018 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ugt_es.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
