Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for уголок хип-хопа

Channel

уголок хип-хопа

@ugolokhiphop

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,912subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545762191
TypeChannel
Username@ugolokhiphop
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ugolokhiphop

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9123,9403,9266 August 2026 — 3,937 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,938 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,940 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,928 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,925 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,924 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,923 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,919 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,920 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,914 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,912 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,908–3,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:203,912-2
13 Sept 2026, 03:373,914-6
8 Sept 2026, 23:593,920+1
31 Aug 2026, 15:433,919-4
28 Aug 2026, 23:553,923-4
25 Aug 2026, 17:433,927+3
22 Aug 2026, 17:573,924-1
19 Aug 2026, 06:163,925-3
16 Aug 2026, 16:433,928-12
10 Aug 2026, 02:123,940+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:403,938+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:043,937first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

410 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17141.7%
🔥12229.8%
custom 53053943613898171676215.1%
👍399.51%
❤‍🔥92.20%
🤩51.22%
20.488%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 410 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC522 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Полугодичные итоги коллекции (с опозданием) 🗓 Почему-то в этом году мне показалось, что полугодие заканчивается 1 августа, а не 1 июля. Видимо, заработался. А потом еще и в отпуск уехал. Так что, наконец добравшись до коллекции и забрав еще пару посылок, традиционно хвастаюсь покупками с начала года. Конечно, приглашаю хвастаться в комментариях всех! Полугодие принесло мне чуть больше 40 новых экземпляров, довольно

custom 530539436138981716727👍117🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC965 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Короче, решил я попробовать это новое сложное оформление для постов (ВК статьи в Телеграме), и при взгляде со смартфона получилось говно. Пусть это вас не отталкивает - текст все равно прочтите, пожалуйста, я его 2 дня собирал по разным источникам.

32custom 530539436138981716712👍9🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC999 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥52custom 5305394361389817167129❤‍🔥32

20 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,350 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Впервые за много лет сходил на V1, получил большое удовольствие. Пропускать в этот раз было нельзя - экстренно выяснилось, что в качестве заморских гостей приглашены легендарный Percee P (серьезно, он сам так представляется), а также Wildchild и DJ Romes из группы Lootpack. Смотрим лайв Перси и Вайлдчайлда здесь. Буквально недавно я вспоминал в канале видос, где молодой Percee P читает фристайл в туалете вместе с Эм

🔥24👍117❤‍🔥5

13 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,650 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ладно, это было слишком очевидно и не могло не произойти. Впервые за 16 лет Эм и Хова исполнили свой единственный совместный трек. Никогда не выходивший синглом и вообще появившийся совершенно случайно, он парадоксально стал, пожалуй, одной из знаковых темных лошадок в карьерах обоих. Давайте по такому поводу вспомним, что же вообще такое «Renegade». Наверное, только ленивый или сидящий в танке не знает, что это не

32🔥12👍7

11 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,450 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Jay Z и Nas выступили вместе 🎤 Вчера у Джигги началась серия из трех концертов, посвященных официальному тридцатилетию его творческой деятельности. Под эти шоу забронирован и уже, разумеется, давно распродан стадион Yankee в Нью-Йорке, и на каждом концерте ожидается толпа около 70000 человек. Интересно, что на продажи билетов была онлайн-очередь из ~1000000 человек. Разделены концерты и по тематике - первый из них

34🔥8custom 53053943613898171672

9 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,710 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Русские рэперы с самым большим словарным запасом - Мутант Ъхвлам 📖 Это следует из интересного исследования, которое мне вчера подкинул Инстаграм. Автор по имени Илья Иноземцев пошел по стопам аналогичного американского материала 2014-2019 годов, в котором выяснилось, что главный книжный червь среди американских рэперов - Aesop Rock. Для Ильи это уже вторая итерация исследования, обновленная и дополненная. Методика

43🔥10custom 53053943613898171675❤‍🔥1👍1

7 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,370 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Смотрим на редкости от Prince Paul 💎 Wax Poetics известен многим как классный журнал про музыку, номера которого иногда даже доезжают из Британии в некоторые наши магазины. Но недавно бренд Wax Poetics расширился, и на базе журнала появился аукцион для исторической музыкальной меморабилии. Команда журнала-аукциона сотрудничает напрямую с артистами, менеджерами и лейблами, которые передают на торги айтемы из первых р

🔥97🤩5custom 53053943613898171674

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ugolokhiphop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

а можно потанцевальней?
@bestdjchannel · 40,614
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
WARHOL
@warhol · 27,500
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
PRNRP
@trap_critics · 29,747
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Тихое Место
@thequietplace · 51,349
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Skryptonite
@skryp_tg · 66,654
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“уголок хип-хопа” (@ugolokhiphop), 3,912 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ugolokhiphop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.