Channel
@uexctoken
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
321subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002215395504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uexctoken |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uexctoken |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 321 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:05 | 324 | -1 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 01:55 | 325 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 326 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 331 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 336 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 336 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
99 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 49 | 49.5% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 39.4% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 8.08% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2025 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Due to some of our team members being sick (seems like this is that time of the season 🤒) we decided to move the launch of the $UEXC Cardano pool to Monday the 15th, which will be followed with Solana marketing start - and perfectly matches the market expectations. The reason why we are moving it is because it’s not just a pool launch. The token itself is technical, and there is a UEX update that goes together with …
👍11
$UEXC Cardano pool launch is coming on December 11th at 3 PM ET! This will mark the start of our Solana marketing campaign. The best marketing timing for $UEXC to conquer the crypto world.
👍5🔥2
@everyone 🚨 Important Update for All C4 Holders 🚨 As you know, we are 100% community-centered, and we always try to give the best deal to every member of our community, and I am sure many of you have experienced that wile talking to me or our BDR team. Over the last few days, several people reached out asking for a bit more time to transfer their $C4 → $UEXC. We also still see new tickets coming in daily from peopl…
👍5❤1
We are thrilled to share the $UEXC whitepaper.
🔥9
Channel name was changed to «UEXC»
🚨 C4 Relaunch & Solana Expansion Announcement The team has been working on a major update for $C4, and it’s time to share what’s next 👇 We believe the current market phase finally makes C4 on Solana the perfect next move. To prepare for this and ensure strong marketing and liquidity, we’ll relaunch the C4 token on Cardano with several key upgrades: --- ### 🔧 What’s Changing 1️⃣ Technical Upgrade – The existing C…
👍7🔥4
This week Amazing news for $C4 ecosystem! The majority is not ready.. only few belivers are 🚀⚠️
🔥7👌3
C4 Fundraiser – the all-in-one tool for founders is coming! ✨ Fundraising ✨ Communication ✨ Reporting All under one hood, simple and powerful. 🚀
👍6🔥3
🚀 $C4 Fundraiser is coming to UEX.US! 💡 What is $C4 Fundraiser? It’s a revolutionary Web3 tool that lets founders raise funds before launching their token — giving projects the solid foundation they need to build properly. 📊 Our research shows over 90% of founders who launch tokens too early fail due to lack of proper funding. Don’t be another statistic. 🔥 Be smart. Fundraise with $C4. Build with confidence. Launc…
🔥9
What $C4 becomes is a DeFi business token. Together, we unite and build amazing products — let’s go decentralization! Decentralization is the future of the economy. Agree?
🔥4
In the last 30 days, $C4 is up 184% 📈 More value flowing into the economy means stronger price action across assets — this is what a true utility coin looks like 💪 You can get $C4 here: DeFi: https://uexswap.com CEX: https://uex.us
🔥11👍3
$C4 is about to explode!!🤯
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uexctoken. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UEXC” (@uexctoken), 321 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uexctoken.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.