Corona war gestern und so läuft, die meisten von uns ahnten es schon, die Aufarbeitung. https://www.achgut.com/artikel/Im_zeugenstand_bei_der_corona_befragung
Signed Danny

Channel
@uebersterblichkeit2021
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
425subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001728405619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uebersterblichkeit2021 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uebersterblichkeit2021 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 425 | -1 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 426 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 428 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 429 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 430 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 430 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Corona war gestern und so läuft, die meisten von uns ahnten es schon, die Aufarbeitung. https://www.achgut.com/artikel/Im_zeugenstand_bei_der_corona_befragung
Signed Danny
Im folgendem Bericht von Nius wird das berichtet und bestätigt was hier in den Kommentaren schon vor längerem thematisiert wurde. https://www.nius.de/corona/news/bergamo-wie-who-massenpanik-provozierte/cdab0e35-0040-49c7-954a-91a727b51e63
Signed Danny
Ich danke Richter Guericke für seine grandiosen Aussagen, die sich jeder Mal selbstkritisch auf der Zunge zergehen lassen sollte. https://www.nordkurier.de/regional/uckermark/corona-kritischer-richter-musste-hausdurchsuchung-ueber-sich-ergehen-lassen-3457812
👍9
Signed Danny
Folgenden Beitrag in den die Sinnhaftigkeit der Corona Maßnahmen beleuchtet und zusammenfast möchte ich mit euch teilen. https://tkp.at/2025/03/24/die-katastrophale-corona-massnahmen-fuehrten-zu-massenhaften-erkrankungen-und-todesfaellen/
👍2
Signed Danny
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Danny
Wer hätte es gedacht? Wir wurden einfach nur verarscht. Immerhin waren einige schlau genug dies nicht zu glauben. Man nannte diese Leute Verschwörungstheoretiker. Corona-Ausbruch: BND geht von Laborunfall aus – Kanzleramt hielt Akten unter Verschluss - WELT https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article255671964/Corona-Ausbruch-BND-geht-von-Laborunfall-aus-Kanzleramt-hielt-Akten-unter-Verschluss.html#Comments
Signed Danny
Heute ist Bundestagswahl. Nutzt die Gelegenheit und geht wählen!
👍4
Signed Danny
Interessanter Artikel in Multipolar, der die Ergebnisse von Marcel Barz zur Übersterblichkeit vor allem im ersten Jahr der Pandemie gut zusammenfasst. Schlussfolgernd daraus wird dem statistischen Bundesamt zudem versuchte Täuschung vorgeworfen. Dem kann ich nichts weiter hinzufügen. Danke Marcel! https://multipolar-magazin.de/meldungen/0186
👍6
Signed Danny
Ich wünsche allen eine frohe Weihnachtszeit. 🧑🎄 Nutzt die Zeit um auch Mal etwas abzuschalten und zur Ruhe zu kommen.
👍13
Signed Danny
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Danny
Das Thema Impfnebenwirkungen und deren Aufarbeitung wird so langsam auch von der Mainstreampresse aufgegriffen.
Signed Danny
Das statistische Bundesamt ist gerade dabei eine Sonderauswertung der monatlichen Todesursachenstatistik der Jahre 2020-2023 zu erstellen. Das Übersichtdiagramm zeigt eigentlich nichts was uns neu ist und ist zudem wenig gut aufgelöst. Folgendes lese ich daraus ab - durch Covid sind Menschen gestorben - es gab aber nicht mehr Tode in der Pandemie als sonst auch. - die Zahl der Toten durch Krebs- und Herz-Kreislauferk…
👍2
Signed Danny
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uebersterblichkeit2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Übersterblichkeit BRD 2021” (@uebersterblichkeit2021), 425 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uebersterblichkeit2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.