Channel
@uchebaru_eng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,425subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001949916432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uchebaru_eng |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uchebaru_eng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 1,425 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 1,433 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,432 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 1,423 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 1,428 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,436 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 1,438 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 287 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Гайз, только что осознала, что до конца лета осталось всего 3 недели🥺 (I'm literally crying inside) Поэтому создала для вас подборку летних обоев для вашего телефончика! но я была бы не я, если бы не добавила к ним полезностей — в каждой из картинок есть по 1 фразе из шаблона 4 говорения. Этот лайфхак со мной еще со времен, когда я сама готовилась к ЕГЭ — чем чаще видишь, тем лучше запомнишь💫 Об этой и других хитр…
вебы этой недели: ✔️ Химия 12.08 в 17:00. Регистрация ✔️ Литература 14.08 в 17:00. Регистрация
Воскресная подборка мемов (я недавно начала вести тикток, не судите строго)
❤1
Само собой, готовиться только с помощью сайтов не достаточно. Только системность и регулярность помогут достичь значительного результата в баллах. Это сложно и мы это знаем🥺 Поэтому на Годовом курсе вас будет сопровождать личный куратор — человек, который поможет собраться когда нет сил, объяснит там, где не понятно и поддержит когда кажется, что ничего не получится. В Учеба.ру мы заботимся о том, чтобы подготовка…
1. Тренажер устной речи. Уже рассказывала про него тут — можно практиковать говорение как на настоящем экзамене - с таймером и с аудио, а не аудиоскриптом 2. Банк заданий Учеба.ру. Если вы думаете, что это просто очередной банк заданий — это не так. К каждому из них написаны комментарии и подсказки, чтобы вы точно разобрались, почему в задании такой ответ 3. Playphrase.me и Youglish.Если появились сомнения, говорят…
Хотите больше бесплатных ресурсов для тренировки ЕГЭ? Всего одно ❤️в реакции и я скину свою личную подборку сайтов-тренажеров
❤1
Что можно найти на сайте ФИПИ и как это поможет в подготовке? ФИПИ — это организация, которая разрабатыввет задания для ЕГЭ и ОГЭ, вносит изменения и обновления в экзамены. На сайте можно найти полезные ресурсы: Демоверсия — пример экзамена. Так будут выглядеть задания на самом экзамене. Спецификация — время, отведенное на выполнение заданий и количество баллов, которое вы можете за них получить. Кодификатор — в…
Тема: "С чего начать подготовку к ЕГЭ по английскому?" Разберем: 💬 как распределяются баллы за тестовую, письменную и устную части; 💬 по каким критериям эксперты оценивают письменную и устную часть; 💬 какие подводные камни есть на экзамене 🗓 7 августа 17:00 Записаться можно по этой ссылочке. Буду рада вас видеть💫
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Английский язык | ЕГЭ 2027 | Учеба.ру pinned a photo
Последний пункт заслуживает отдельного внимания. Это определенно миф для меня🙃 I mean, это возможно, если ваш уровень уже достаточно высок. Тогда вы сможете натренироваться к формату экзамена за это время. But! Расчитывать на это небезопасно, учитывая, что от этого экзамена зависит поступление. Во-первых — это огромный стресс и вам придется готовиться очень интенсивно, около 6 раз в неделю. Во-вторых — это большая…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @uchebaru_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,425,875 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский язык | ЕГЭ 2027 | Учеба.ру” (@uchebaru_eng), 1,425 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uchebaru_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.