Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канава лудомана

Channel

Канава лудомана

@ubicaludik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

994subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232390616
TypeChannel
Username@ubicaludik
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ubicaludik

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9941,0341,0146 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,031 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,023 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,021 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,018 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,017 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,005 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,003 subscribers12 October 2026 — 994 subscribers6 August 202612 October 2026
13 measurements spanning 67 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 988–1,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 11:58994-9
6 Oct 2026, 02:371,003-2
28 Sept 2026, 12:011,005-12
15 Sept 2026, 19:571,017-1
12 Sept 2026, 12:591,018-3
8 Sept 2026, 06:181,021-2
2 Sept 2026, 21:381,023-2
27 Aug 2026, 15:531,025-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:161,027-4
20 Aug 2026, 22:161,031-2
10 Aug 2026, 19:131,033-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:521,034no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:151,034first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4133.6%
👍3932.0%
😱2016.4%
😁75.74%
😭54.10%
🥰43.28%
🔥21.64%
🤔21.64%
👌10.82%
🤡10.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ubicaludik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2025 to 20 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC431 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня может случится как по мне все что угодно, Фурия показала плохую игру в четвертьфиналах как по мне, 9з сами обосрались, но с другой стороны Фурия поборола ту проблему когда они не могли дальше пройти и возможно что-то изменится? Если молодой не перформит, играть очень тяжело. Аврора просто как будто неплохо играют и все, можно было бы 3 карты поставить, но нужно карты ждать, потому что обе команды не играют эн…

❤1

19 Jun 2026, 18:58 UTC452 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ебанутый матч, за это я и люблю контру, но по моему мнению ни одна из этих команд не соперник виталити, если бы у спирит был тренер, думаю было бы сильно проще и были бы шансы против витьков/фалконс Соррян, что пропадаю, без партнера тяжело вести тгшку сами понимаете, сам я редко ставлю

❤12

9 May 2026, 22:04 UTC893 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Завтра просыпаюсь с миллионами на балике

👍3

9 May 2026, 10:40 UTC827 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Суперхалява Тут могла быть ваша реклама

👍8

9 May 2026, 10:15 UTC721 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не поверю в это извините

👍3

30 Apr 2026, 20:54 UTC860 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ладно, фурия вылет с турнира, да и в целом я думаю не покажут уже в этом году ничего. Судя по всему новость фоллена буквально разрушила состав))

❤5

30 Apr 2026, 16:39 UTC802 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Че то заснул и забыл скинуть ставку: Общий кэф 3.4 По оставшимся короче выражаю опасения: Виталити 2-0 опасно, так как мираж может быть, но вчера была плотная пощечина, сегодня может быть иначе, если вас устраивает кэф 2-0 то мона Фейз клан и фурия, ребят, фулл рандом, фурия вчера показала как может троллить, тут против слабого ростера, еще и эншент в бане. Короче это нихуя не фри кэф 1.3 Нави гл, ну тут я за нави…

👍4

29 Apr 2026, 16:53 UTC594 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Какая же база произошла)

😁7❤1

29 Apr 2026, 12:08 UTC594 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Могла бы быть фришка, но команда г2 не понятно че может. Мб там 3 карты будет. По фану 2к закинул Можно взять без г2 и накалупать кэф 2, в целом он норм, вопрос только в одном, а точно ли всем не похуй на турик?)

👍1

27 Apr 2026, 16:40 UTC593 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хорошая ставочка обьективно, по моему мнению главной угрозой виталити на бласте были как раз футы, но сегодня вышла инфа что они будут без лаункса играть и у них будет тренер на замене, некий кулио Так что ставка реально норм

👍4

27 Apr 2026, 11:07 UTC538 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Добрый день господа, буков у нас в ближайшее время не будет я думаю, так что ставки будут по желанию если я захочу на что-то сам поставить Но вы всегда можете че то скидывать под этот пост и будет тут общаться

❤9

18 Apr 2026, 12:34 UTC790 views4 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Вчера спирит включились, но есть вайб что сегодня этого не хватит, я буду на своем и думаю что фальконы выиграют команду спирит, возможно даже 2-0. Насчет Виталити Фурия, тут будет полный пиздец, Фоллен заявил об окончании карьеры в конце этого года, Бразилия точно будет провожать старика, будут орать за него, но думаю Витьки заберут, 2-0 впадлу ставить По итогу: Жду Фальконов победа и Витьков. По точным счетам буде…

👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ubicaludik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канава лудомана” (@ubicaludik), 994 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ubicaludik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.