Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

UBC

@ubcliga

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

611subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001970942319
TypeChannel
Username@ubcliga
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ubcliga

Growth

608611609.57 Aug 2026, 15:18 — 608 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:04 — 608 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:01 — 611 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:188 Aug 2026, 14:01
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 608–611 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:01611+3
8 Aug 2026, 03:04608no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:18608first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.5%
avg views ÷ 611 subscribers
Avg views / post
492
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,900
Reactions total429
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

429 reactions across 12 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14634.0%
13631.7%
🤯255.83%
😈214.90%
😨112.56%
🤷‍♂112.56%
🏆102.33%
💩92.10%
custom 532336620965830040381.86%
😁81.86%
🙏71.63%
🤬61.40%
💅51.17%
🍓40.932%
👀40.932%
🤣40.932%
🌭30.699%
💘30.699%
20.466%
💋20.466%
4 further kinds40.932%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ubcliga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC122 views49 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 UBC 5 УЖЕ ЗАВТРА Какие бои ждете больше? 💯 - КРЮК vs РЫБА ❤️ - БОРЩ vs КОРОБКА 🔥 - ОНЛИ vs БИГГИ 💅 - СЕЙН АЙ vs БУГАТТИ 💘 - ФЕДЯЙ vs ЛУЧ 🏆 - ФЕД vs МИЛОВАН 😈 - КОРОЛЬ АУРЫ vs КЛЭППЕР ⚡️ - ЯША vs БРОКЕР 🍓 - ЭГОИСТ vs КУЗНЕЧИК 🌭 - КОДЕР vs ГЛОТАТЕЛЬ 🤩 Лига UBC

🔥20😈7💅54🌭3💘32🍓2

7 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC220 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

‼️ ДАНЧАТ ТОЛЬКО БОЙЦЫ ПОЛУТЯЖЕЛОГО ДИВИЗИОНА В статистике за 4 турнира UBC числится всего 4 данка, и, кроме игроков из полутяжелой весовой, никто не занес себе в счет такой вид нокаута.. КАК ТАК!? UPD: Палермо из полулегкого дивизиона - единственный боец из других весовых, имеющий в своём активе данк! UPD 2: Мак из тяжелого - второй боец среди других весовых, кто ставил данк! 💩 — Админу за дизинфу 🤩 Лига UBC

😨11💩9🔥31🤷‍♂1

6 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC289 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 ЛИНИЯ UBC 5 Ставь на бои лиги, зарабатывая внутриигровой coin - не деньги! UBC coin - наша валюта, которую нельзя купить и вывести в деньги, но можно поставить и получить - посещая ивенты и турниры лиги! Забирай фрибет от 1 до 15 coin и прогнозируй исход: @timdncn 🤩 Лига UBC

13🔥3💋2custom 53233662096583004031

6 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC915 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👑 UBC 5 Уже в воскресенье 9 августа на ЦСКА пятый турнир лиги! ➡️ Начало боев в 16:45 ➡️ Главный бой в 19:25 📍Локация: Москва, Улица Ходынский бульвар, 10А 🤩 Лига UBC

23🔥6🍓2🤣2custom 53233662096583004031

5 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC662 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎮 БОРЩ vs АНАР стример Игрок UBC Борщ нашел нового соперника из тяжелейшего веса: Сегодня он встретился с Анаром и сыграл против него на щелбан Видео игры После игры Борщ с Пончиком позвали Анара сыграть в UBC «Да не, вы че, в баскет я именно мертвый, типа я там не бегаю, не двигаюсь, я так максимум побросать» — Анар 🤩 Лига UBC

19🔥7🏆3🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC616 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ПЕРВЫЙ ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ РЕЙТИНГ ДИВИЗИОНОВ UBC Топ-5 бойцов весовых категорий выбирались исходя из критериев: 🟢Рекорд бойца 🟢Уровень соперников 🟢Убедительность побед 🟢Медиа активность в UBC 🤩 Лига UBC

🔥187🏆5❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC389 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ребята дорогие и бойцы UBC, Мы столкнулись с проблемой, которую без вас не решить: заявок в лигу накопилось много, при этом игроков в ней уже тоже много. Но остановить прием заявок мы не можем, потому что лига обязана постепенно развиваться как в плане уровня игры, так и в плане интересных людей в ней Пора начинать серьезную чистку от не тянущих бойцов, но есть еще два варианта, как можно минимизировать потери кадр

🔥3912🤷‍♂10

4 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC379 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😵 БОЕЦ UBC ВПАЛ В КОМУ За 1 час до боя против Морока 1 августа: Клэппер впал в кому и провел 10 минут в состоянии клинической смерти. Благо он вернулся к жизни и готов уже в выходные дебютировать в UBC Ещё UBC 3 и UBC 4 пропустили из-за травм: БИГГИ — ангина БИГБОЙ — солнечный удар МОРФИН — температура 39 🤩 Лига UBC

🤯258🙏7👀4custom 53233662096583004031

4 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC371 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

👀 КТО ЕЩЕ НЕ ВИДЕЛ ЕГО? Тёма Онли дебютировал в UBC с нокаута в 1-м раунде и сказал, что его следующим соперником должен стать Борщ, либо Бигги! Кого ставить против него? ❤️ — Борщ 🔥 — Бигги 😈 — Нового бойца UBC 🤩 Лига UBC

🔥28😈1411

3 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,130 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Женский Дивизион в UBC💚 Начиная с UBC 5 теперь в лиге будут играть и девушки, любая дама может стать бойцом UBC ✉️ Для заявок — @denrodmen Заявка нужна в таком образе: фио, ник на русском, рост, вес, возраст и фотография в файле 🤩 Лига UBC

🔥195custom 53233662096583004035

3 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC406 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🇨🇳 ИГРОК UBC ЕДЕТ В КИТАЙ? После дебюта ПАНЧЕР поделился инсайдом - что отправляется на просмотр в SHAGHAI DRAGONS Несостыковка в том, что такой команды в Китае нет, есть только SHANGHAI SHARKS ошибся или пойман на пи#деже? 😁 🤩 Лига UBC

12😁6🔥3🤓1🤡1

3 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC401 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

😡 ПОЧЕМУ ОН НЕНАВИДИТ ВСЕХ? В закрытой беседе с бойцами UBC SUBB всю прошедшую неделю утверждал, что ненавидит абсолютно всех — в чём же причина такой агрессии Макса? ❤️ — от ненависти до любви один шаг 🤬 — он не заводит себе друзей 🤩 Лига UBC

21🤬6😁2🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ubcliga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,826 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UBC” (@ubcliga), 611 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ubcliga.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.