16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,550–26,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 23:36
26,575
-29
21 Aug 2026, 13:35
26,604
-13
20 Aug 2026, 11:18
26,617
-20
19 Aug 2026, 09:52
26,637
-9
18 Aug 2026, 11:02
26,646
-13
17 Aug 2026, 09:28
26,659
-26
15 Aug 2026, 17:18
26,685
-18
14 Aug 2026, 02:37
26,703
-15
12 Aug 2026, 23:05
26,718
-21
11 Aug 2026, 21:06
26,739
+26
10 Aug 2026, 17:53
26,713
+13
9 Aug 2026, 18:41
26,700
-6
8 Aug 2026, 18:02
26,706
-19
7 Aug 2026, 15:50
26,725
-9
7 Aug 2026, 11:15
26,734
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:05
26,734
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 26,575 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,220
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
21 (31 May 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
35,450
Reactions total
323
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 31s
Average length
4m 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
622 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
265
42.6%
👍
113
18.2%
❤🔥
51
8.20%
👏
39
6.27%
🆒
37
5.95%
🎉
33
5.31%
🏆
32
5.14%
🔥
29
4.66%
🐳
10
1.61%
👌
10
1.61%
💯
2
0.322%
🥱
1
0.161%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀 The Bear Market Is Ending. A New Bull Market Is Beginning. 🚀
For a long time, the crypto market has been in a difficult period.
Low liquidity.
Low confidence.
Low attention.
And, most importantly, low expectations.
But markets change before people realize they have changed.
We believe the long crypto winter is coming to an end, and we are entering the early stage of a new bull market.
Bitcoin has started to re…
🎉 Crypto market surges overnight, Fear & Greed Index rises to 62, hitting a high since October 2025
On August 20, according to Alternative data, today's Crypto Fear & Greed Index rose to 62 (compared to 46 yesterday), pushing market sentiment into the "Greed" zone. This figure marks the highest point since October 2025.
Note: The Fear & Greed Index ranges from 0 to 100 and is calculated based on the following indic…
Trump’s Big Crypto Pivot: U.S. Eyes Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to Become ‘Crypto Capital of the World’
In a landmark meeting at the White House, President Trump sat down with industry giants including Coinbase, Ripple, and Robinhood to outline a massive pro-crypto roadmap.
Here are the four key takeaways from his address:
🚀 “The War is Over”: Trump officially declared an end to the U.S. government’s hostility towar…
🚀 Something Big Is Coming to uTrading
Our engineers have been working on something ambitious: a Universal Strategy Editor designed to let you build virtually any trading strategy available in the market.
And you don't need to be a strategy expert.
With AI models such as Gemini, ChatGPT, and DeepSeek, you will be able to “hire” AI to help you design, build, and refine your strategies.
From strategy design → deploy…
🎉 Dear uTrading community members,
uTrading Keeps Getting Better! uTrading continues to excel! 👍
Major update:
🚀 Big Update Alert – Get Ready for More Power, Flexibility!
uTrading 1.8.2 Update
1. Also fixed numerous minor issues.
2. Added a profit sharing chart.
3. Added USDC to the OKX API.
4. Added USDC to the Bitget API.
5. Added a "Profit Share" mode to synchronized trading.
6. Optimized the blacklist and …
🤩 The Cycle 11 of the uTrading Global Rewards Pool has ended, and the claims process has now begun! 🎉
1️⃣ Overall Prize Pool = 4279.26 USDT
C-VIP5 22.5% = 962.83 USDT
C-VIP6 22.5% = 962.83 USDT
C Points 45% = 1925.67 USDT = 9477 C Points
S Points 10% = 427.92 USDT = 7507 S Points
2️⃣ C-VIP Prize Pool = 1925.67 USDT
C-VIP5, 408 People
C-VIP5 Personal Bonus
962.83÷(408+16) ≈ 2.27 USDT
+16: Members receiving double bo…
🚩uTrading Vision 2026-2028: Building the AI Trading OS
From Automated Trading to Intelligent Market Infrastructure
🚀 uTrading Future Vision
From Smart Trading Bot to AI Trading Operating System
Dear uTrading Community,
Over the past few months, you may have noticed that we have not been posting frequent announcements on our official channels.
Some users may wonder:
“Is uTrading still actively developing?”
…
1️⃣ Market probability analysis
2️⃣ Risk probability models
3️⃣ Multi-factor decision systems
Helping users move from:
“Guessing the market”
to:
“Managing probabilities.”
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
Phase 4: Global Trading Network
Connecting Users, Strategies, AI, and Markets
Our ultimate vision is to build a global trading network connecting:
Users × Strategies × AI × Data × Exchanges
A future where:
🌍 Users from around …
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @uTrading_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,366,764 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“uTrading Channel” (@uTrading_Channel), 26,575 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uTrading_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.