8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,714–3,759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 14:26
3,719
-10
24 Aug 2026, 13:29
3,729
-3
21 Aug 2026, 04:04
3,732
-7
17 Aug 2026, 17:38
3,739
-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:39
3,741
-10
11 Aug 2026, 02:21
3,751
-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:02
3,753
-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:01
3,754
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.43%
avg views ÷ 3,719 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
10 (25 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
824
Reactions total
103
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
186 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
110
59.1%
custom 5350809315512963536
61
32.8%
😍
15
8.06%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Еще одно достижение этого июля — развивать одну весьма нишевую соц. сеть 🤭
it turned out to be a game changer!!
Кто тоже ведет threads? Давайте обменяемся и подпишемся 🫶 я там устраиваю эксперименты с форматом)
❤️ — поддержать мои начинания!
😏 Самый недооцененный этап урока
— revision
Вот тут кстати делюсь некоторыми идеями как можно интересно реализовать эту часть урока
Давайте разберемся для начала, что такое revision и recycling:
🔄 Revision = мы возвращаемся к тому, что уже учили.
Это не обязательно просто повторить правило или список слов — это может быть любая активность, которая помогает вспомнить и проверить знания.
Например:
«Давайте вспомним…
Моя главная цель на этот год осуществлена, я сдала на права!!!!! #tutoroutine
I literally manifested this ✨ OMG, I’m over the moon 🔥
Хотите подробнее расскажу?
P.S. Фотка, конечно, вышла смешная, оставлю ее для себя и гаишников))
Как я исправляю ошибки так, чтобы ученик не боялся говорить (и не потому, что мне все равно)
Я не исправляю ошибки сразу, точно не сразу 🫂
Даю возможность сказать, произнести хоть что-то, попытаться. Никогда не буду перебивать. Мое золотое правило: если постоянно перебивать исправлениями —собьешь ученика с нужной мысли, и он вообще перехочешь что либо говорить, сужу по своему опыту тоже.
Поэтому я пользуюсь таким …
Моё самое неожиданное хобби? Я играю на фортепиано 🎙 #tutoroutine
Вот такой fun fact обо мне: в 7 я пошла в музыкалку, и на протяжении следующих 7 лет стабильно занималась, основное направление у меня было народное пение, но также в комплекте шло фортепиано, музыкальная литература и всеми нелюбимое сольфеджио 😂
И оочень долго я не бралась за инструмент, последний раз играла еще перед поступление в университет, то е…
🫂 есть несколько идей, о чем будет следующий пост, и вот они:
Как я исправляю ошибки, чтобы ученик не боялся говорить48%
Как я превращаю видео с YouTube в урок35%
Как я понимаю понятие «лексический подход»26%
Кажется, именно любопытство — мой главный профессиональный навык30%
Одна мысль, которая полностью изменила мои уроки52%
Самый недооценённый этап урока43%
Свой вариант в комментарии0%
The shares total 234%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#моиразработки 💭
20 идей для осмысленного завершения занятия
Признавайтесь, у кого тоже иногда в конце урока:
— «Any questions?»
— «No?»
— «See you next time»
А ведь эти несколько минут можно использовать намного интереснее. По крайне мере я стараюсь успевать (преподы поймут 😅)
Собрала вопросы и активности, которые помогают студентам остановиться и подумать:
«А что нового я сегодня действительно забрал? Что стало…
Если вы придёте ко мне на занятия, приготовьтесь часто слышать 🦆
мое главное правило: если носитель так не скажет — мы тоже не будем 🦔 ибо мы разбираем современную лексику, естественные фразы и живой английский, приходите ко мне в группы для средних и высоких уровней, увидите все сами 🫂 мне важно давать актуальный материал!
Делюсь, как я «докрутила» речь учениц из моей субботней группы С1, начали блок Sport, встреч…
custom 535080931551296353614🔥6
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @tytproenglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🫂 есть несколько идей, о чем будет следующий пост, и вот они:
Как я исправляю ошибки, чтобы ученик не боялся говорить48%
Как я превращаю видео с YouTube в урок35%
Как я понимаю понятие «лексический подход»26%
Кажется, именно любопытство — мой главный профессиональный навык30%
Одна мысль, которая полностью изменила мои уроки52%
Самый недооценённый этап урока43%
Свой вариант в комментарии0%
The shares total 234%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anastasia | ProEnglish” (@tytproenglish), 3,719 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tytproenglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.