Channel
@typology1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,084subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001005569698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @typology1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/typology1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 3,084 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 3,085 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 3,085 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 October 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
مطالعاتی که روی نظریه یونگ شده است، حقایق زیر را اثبات کرده است؛ درونگرایان به رشته های تکنیکال و علمی بیشتر تمایل دارند برونگرایان به مشاغلی با ارتباطات گسترده... افراد IXFJ نمرات بالاتری در مدرسه اخذ میکنند افراد برونگرا حال خوش تر و رضایتمندی بیشتری در زندگی تجربه میکنند Theories of Personality by Duane Schultz and Sydney Schultz | Jul 2020|p.104
این فایل هم حاصل تمام مطالعات در زمینه اعتبار MBTI است که خود سایت موسسه MBTI جمع آوری کرده است.
اصل مقاله را اینجا بخوانید لطفا This comprehensive literature search identified 221 potential studies, of which seven met our inclusion criteria. Four of the studies examined construct validity, but their varying methods did not permit pooling for meta-analysis. These studies agree that the instrument has reasonable construct validity. The three studies of test-retest reliability did allow a meta-analysis to be perf…
این مقاله سال 2017 درباره اعتبار تست MBTI یک مطالعه سیستمیک به عمل آورده است و نتایج جالبی دارد. از جمله اینکه ضریب همبستگی بالای 75 صدم برای 3 ترجیح MBTI حاصل شده است ( بالای هفت دهم یعنی معتبر) و ضریب T/F شده 61 صدم Source: Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity , Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring 2017), pp. 1-27
❓دانش MBTI چگونه میتواند زندگی شما را دگرگون کند؟ احتمالا تا الان بارها وسوسه شدهاید که بدانید تیپ شخصیتیتان چیست و یا اصلا برایتان سوال شده که این تیپ شخصیتی که خیلیها دربارهاش حرف میزنند به چه درد میخورد و با آن چه کار میشود کرد.🤔 واقعیت این است که شما تنها نیستید چون خیلی از آنهایی که تصور میکنند تیپ شخصیتیشان را میشناسند هم درست نمیدانند که با آن چه کار کنند و فکر میکنند که فقط قرار است از آن به ع…
https://www.instagram.com/p/CG6tHbMgNvD/?igshid=1xbgveugvlarj
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGPuFhdAENA/?igshid=vc8jzskoxbqf
قصه تئوری مشرب Temperament در مجله شماره 18 منتشر شد. لینک دانلود فایل PDF مجله:👇 https://t.me/typology1/342 #مجله_تیپ #MBTI @drshiri @typology1
شماره 18 مجله تیپ منتشر شد. مجله تیپ، اولین مجله آموزشی و تخصصی به زبان فارسی در زمینه Archetype&MBTI. #دپارتمانMBTI #خانه_توانگری_طوبی قصه تئوری مشرب ها چیست؟ #TYPE #مجله_تیپ #MBTI @drshiri @typology1
بررسی 10 دلیل رفتار معماگونه ی تیپ INFJ در یادداشت جدید سایت Typology.ir آدرس مقاله:👇 http://typology.ir/category/article/ @drshiri #MBTI #INFJ @typology1
یادداشتی جدید در سایت Typology.ir که به بررسی چند ویژگی تیپ کمیاب INFJ پرداخته است. آدرس یادداشت:👇 http://typology.ir/category/mbti-in-a-relationship/ @drshiri #MBTI
F&T???
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @typology1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Typology” (@typology1), 3,084 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/typology1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.