Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

2PM TRADERS

@twopm_traders

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,272subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002767517947
TypeChannel
Username@twopm_traders
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/twopm_traders

Growth

1,2721,3491,310.57 August 2026 — 1,349 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,349 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,334 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,272 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,260–1,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:521,272-62
8 Aug 2026, 10:501,334-15
7 Aug 2026, 22:211,349no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:491,349first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 1,272 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.598%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,083
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
250.0%
👍125.0%
🤣125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC34 viewsread 7 August 2026

Join below Channel for Index options Selling We will provide pure Hedge based Options selling calls with fixed and modified SL🙏 https://t.me/NiftysellingwithHedge Click here👆and Join for our options selling channel Queries - @Indexvv https://t.me/NiftysellingwithHedge

7 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚀Explosive "Mega Profit" of this Week🚀 ​💰 Total Profit: Rs.6,07,225 /- 💰 ⚡ Power of Premium Calls: When the market moves, we capture the profit! 💸💸 〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰 ​🌟 Why Rudev Traders?(Benefits) 🏆 ​💎 Expertise in: Bullion (Gold/Silver), Energy (Crude/Natural Gas) & Base Metals (Copper/Zinc). 📊 Daily Signals: 6 to 8 Strategically Backed High-Confirmation Calls. 🎯 Accuracy: 90%+ High-Precision "Rocket Calls". 〰〰〰〰

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Small SAMPLE of the GREENs from Today 🤘🤘 SONACOMS 🔥🔥 Our 2PM TRADER renewed today and Recovered the monthly FEES in just few hours 🫠🫠 Not NEW MEMBERS but Renewals justify the WORK you do and confirms that you are going in Right Direction ☺️☺️ 2PM TRADERS 😇😇

7 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC73 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It was SONACOMS 👏👏 As always, perfect ENTRY with Right Price guidance for all members to get the Right Entry with No confusion 🫠🫠 We ENTER and booomm it Blasted and hit almost 1:2 🔥🔥 Proper timely and accurate GUIDANCE throughout 👌👌 Auto closed and booked @ 18 🤑🤑 7,000+ Profits booked 🥳🥳 Promise DELIVERED 🤘🤘 2PM TRADERS 😇😇

7 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC69 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ha ha I told you guys, we always END the week on a HIGH and we did it 😁😁 Wait for our GREEN TRADE today 😀😀 2PM TRADES 😇😇

6 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC99 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Still Trying to DEAL with CAS. It had a MAJOR IMPACT on the market, more than expected. 3 days of Losses. Today we booked a very SMALL LOSS of 1,800. Although I wanted to go with CANBK, which could've given us 5k easily, but I decided to go with BANKBARODA as I expected a similar moment, which DIDN'T happen. Anyways, as always, we will try to CLOSE the week on a HIGH tomorrow. Everything TRANSPARENT & HONEST 👏👏

4 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC144 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Not a GOOD START to the day. NIFTY was falling and REVERSED right after our ENTRY. Loss booked: 5,200 Small losses happen, just need to accept 🥲🥲 Everything TRASNPARENT. I never shy away from showing LOSSES because there is NO TRADER in the world without LOSSES. You always tend to LOSE around 40% of the time, so there is no ISSUE in SHOWING. But if somebody is NOT showing LOSSES, then it's a PROBLEM. 2PM TRADE

3 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC167 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It was ABCAPITAL 🤘🤘 1:1 ✅✅ 5,000 Profits 👌👌 Started the WEEK in GREEN 💚💚 We had SL @ buying. It was a RISK FREE SAFE trade 😜😜 GUIDANCE 💯💯 2PM TRADERS 😇😇

3 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC161 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Knock Knock Knock.... 2PM PREMIUM has already entered a Trade and is now in GREEN 💚💚 Any guesses which STOCK?? 🙈🙈 2PM TRADES 😇😇

1 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC190 viewsread 7 August 2026

👆👆👆👆 Promise DELIVERED 😎😎 It's all about CONFIDENCE and CONVICTION in your Skills + the right STRATEGY and DISCIPLINE to Execute. 2PM TRADERS 😇😇

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @twopm_traders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 51,508 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“2PM TRADERS” (@twopm_traders), 1,272 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twopm_traders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.