Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Два Биткоина

@two_btc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,190subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121403348
TypeChannel
Username@two_btc
DescriptionНовости рынка криптовалют и майнинга Обязательно читать: https://2bitcoins.ru/kriptovaljutnaja-biblija/ Майнинг-пул: @pool_2btc Чат о криптовалютах: @two_btc_chat Чат о железе: @two_btc_hardware Реклама на сайте❗️ -> @dudlik_spb
Created17 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/two_btc

Growth

10,19010,21610,2036 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,214 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,210 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,204 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,186–10,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:3210,190-11
11 Aug 2026, 09:3310,201-3
10 Aug 2026, 06:3610,204-6
9 Aug 2026, 06:4110,210-6
8 Aug 2026, 08:2210,216+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:2510,215+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:1010,214-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:4810,215no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:2810,215first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.16%
avg views ÷ 10,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
730
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.404%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held58 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total42,325
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
54,400
Videos
1,570
Links
18,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 29 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2947.5%
69.84%
🔥58.20%
😁58.20%
👍46.56%
🤔46.56%
🐳34.92%
🤨34.92%
👀11.64%
😱11.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC261 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Майнеры уходят в ИИ, комиссии мизерные, хешрейт падает: что вообще происходит с Биткоином Комиссии в сети Биткоина опустились к уровням, которые мы видели, когда монета стоила меньше 400 долларов. При этом награда за блок уже урезана, цена от пика просела почти наполовину, а себестоимость добычи внезапно стала выше рыночной цены. Крупные майнеры выключают оборудование или перекидывают мощности в дата центры для иск

12 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC514 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ЦБ допустил к торгам криптовалюты для розницы и сразу поставил жёсткие рамки Российский регулятор внезапно решил приоткрыть дверь на рынок цифровых активов для неквалифицированных инвесторов, но сделал это максимально аккуратно и с калькулятором в руках. В списке допущенных монет всего три позиции, а годовой лимит покупок завязан на каждого посредника отдельно. При этом квалифицированным инвесторам достаётся совсем

11😁1

11 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC599 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Крупнейшие криптокомпании потребовали от ИИ‑лабораторий особых условий: что им так не нравится в нынешних правилах Индустрия Биткоина и криптовалют внезапно объединилась вокруг одной довольно неудобной темы для OpenAI и других ИИ‑лабораторий. В открытом письме от имени десятков компаний звучат очень конкретные запросы и не менее конкретные претензии к тому, как сейчас устроен доступ к передовым моделям. В тексте фи

1

11 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC615 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ЦБ допустил Bitcoin, Ethereum и USDT к торгам в России: что это меняет для частных инвесторов Российский регулятор наконец решил определиться с криптой и подготовил проект правил для публичного обращения цифровых активов на биржах. В перечень попали всего три монеты, зато самые крупные и ликвидные. Остальным альтам вежливо показали дверь по формальным критериям закона. При этом для неквалифицированных инвесторов пр

11😁1

11 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC640 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Anthropic платит майнерам Биткоина миллиарды: что не так с рынком ИИ и энергии Майнеры Биткоина внезапно стали любимыми партнерами ИИ-компаний. Anthropic за месяц законтрактовал у них мощности почти на 28 млрд долларов и это не про добычу монет. В ход идут мегаватты, земля и доступ к электросетям, а не новые фермы с асиками. Riot, TeraWulf и другие крупные игроки уже перестраиваются под высокопроизводительные вычис

1

11 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC709 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Инвесторы бегут из холодных кошельков в Биткоин‑ETF после взлома Coldcard или это просто красиво звучит Американские спотовые Биткоин ETF за неделю получили около 850 млн долларов, и это случилось аккурат после громкого взлома аппаратных кошельков Coldcard с потерями до 130 млн в BTC. На фоне паники вокруг self custody внезапно выигрывают регулируемые фонды с кастодианами и отчетами. При этом больше 80 процентов пр

10 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC722 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Strategy впервые распродаёт часть биткоина и наращивает долларовый резерв: что за этим стоит Компания Strategy, которую многие помнят как MicroStrategy, неожиданно избавилась от части своих BTC и параллельно привлекла сотни миллионов долларов через выпуск акций. На фоне многолетней мантры про «только покупаем» это выглядит как минимум странным ходом. Часть средств ушла на выкуп собственных привилегированных акций,

11

10 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC701 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Coinsbuy потеряла миллионы в крипте и получила слишком наглядный урок по безопасности Кошельки платёжной платформы Coinsbuy внезапно опустели почти на 7.9 млн долларов в USDT, а атака одновременно задела сети Ethereum и TRON. Часть средств уже успели прогнать через анонимный Monero, а несколько бирж и обменников неожиданно оказались в центре событий. Мы разбираем, как хакер двигал украденные стейблкоины, что удалос

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @two_btc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 224,932 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Два Биткоина” (@two_btc), 10,190 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/two_btc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.